Monday 27 August 2012

Singapore is now the richest country in the world

 http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/8/25/focus/11910451&sec=focus

Saturday August 25, 2012

Living in the richest country

INSIGHT: DOWN SOUTH By SEAH CHIANG NEE
cnseah05@hotmail.com


By most standards, it would be reason to bring out the champagne bottle, but because of the extraordinary circumstances, the majority of Singaporeans are not cheering.
WHILE celebrating their 47th National Day, Singaporeans received news that people anywhere would die to hear that their country is now the richest in the world.
Technically speaking, this transformation from a poor, squatter island in less than 50 years has been impressive.
During this time, without much natural resources, the city has recorded one of the world’s fastest growth rates on per capita basis, exceeded only by Japan and Germany after World War II.
It has, like an invisible giant hand, lifted the bulk of a squalid population and moved it into the middle class. Few others with bigger natural assets have fared as well.
Yet the news has evidently impressed the world more than it did Singaporeans.
The reason is that the majority of citizens here are too concerned with the structured high cost of living that collective wealth has bestowed. It has made the city one of the most expensive in the world.
On perspective, however, most Singaporeans have benefitted from the progress over the generation. A minority has prospered greatly.
According to the Wall Street Journal, Singapore’s per capita GDP has reached US$56,532 (RM175,250) in 2010 – measured by purchasing power parity. This has beaten Norway, the United States and Hong Kong.
By most standards, this would have been reason to bring out the champagne bottle, but because of the extraordinary circumstances, the majority of Singaporeans are not cheering.
Since the report, the number of centa-millionaires – people with more than US$100mil (RM310mil) – has grown 13%, higher than the global average at 6%.
The problem is that it is predicted to grow by another 44% by 2016, which probably means higher inflation for all.
The fact is that Singaporeans – already hit by one of the world’s highest inflation rates – are too burdened by expensive housing, cars and general living expenses to be cheerful.
Yet, there is no denying that the majority of Singaporeans are living better than they ever had. Singapore has been transformed into a middle class society and now has the dubious title of being the wealthiest in the world.
But in the past five years, living standards have taken a turn for the worse for many people despite the collective affluence.
An influx of cheap-cost foreigners has resulted in acute shortage and income stagnation in many cases.
So why are Singaporeans so unimpressed with living in the richest land in the world? The reasons are as follows:
> Some 37% of residents are foreigners, quite a few of them ultra-wealthy. The import of billionaires provides little or no benefits to the average citizens except pushing up prices. Take the foreigner portion away and the city could be that much poorer; and
> A large part of the wealth is in corporate hands rather than with individuals. Not all of it ends up in big-paying jobs for locals.
As a result of the large amount of money sloshing around, prices of things like houses, cars and healthcare are rising with no sign of abating. Many loans and mortgages are increasing.
Forbes recently reported: “The latest list of wealthy Singaporeans showed lots of money sloshing around Singapore – but it may just be the tip of the iceberg.”
Good news? I don’t think so. No Singaporeans are crazy enough to pray for poverty, but extreme wealth in the hands of a few is just as bad. Without that the economic gap here is already the world’s widest.
Singapore’s richest people have a collective net worth of US$59.4bil (RM184bil), up from $54.4bil (RM168.8bil) last year. It now has 16 billionaires compared to 13 the previous year, Forbes reported.
Ten of every 100,000 households in Singapore are now classified as “ultra-high-net-worth” households, with each having more than US$100mil (RM310mil) in private financial wealth.
All these impressive fortunes are good for boasting, but believe me, I would rather wish for a more even distribution. The foreign billionaires can be here today, gone tomorrow.
Singaporeans are practical enough to realise that wealth in the form of paper notes is too transient.
Since it is measured in US dollars, part of the fast growth is due to the strong surging Singapore dollar.
Are we in fact richer than countries like Indonesia or Australia, which may not have our cash or GDP but have plenty of natural resources in the ground like oil, iron or even water that are more abiding?
This was an early reason that former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew gave for Singapore accumulating huge amounts of reserves. “It’s for a rainy day” a crisis to make up for lack of ground wealth.
As the wealth report was released, the pro-government The Straits Times reported that the number of households on short and medium-term public assistance shot up by 81% – from 5,471 to 9,911 over the past year.
This rising wealth is greeted with pride by a few elderly citizens who remember their poorer past. But, by and large, Singaporeans have reacted cynically to it.
Prominent blogger dawning bread wrote: “There might have been a time when people here would have taken pride in such an accolade.”
Now, he said, the publication of the news on page one of the major newspaper, The Straits Times, “must have annoyed a lot of people”.
“I don’t feel rich,” another Singaporean said. How could Singapore be richer than Switzerland or the US?
“Statistics can be toyed around to fit any agenda. Look around you – does this look like the richest country on the planet?” asked Invictus.

Sunday 26 August 2012

UMNO menentang KEBEBASAN RAKYAT!!!

Kalau kebebasan senjata Anwar, adalah ini bererti bahawa tidak ada
kebebasan diMalaysia dibawah UMNO sekarang?

Padahal jelas sekali dalam perlembagaan, undang undang, perjanjian
antara bangsa dan UN, kebebasan perlu dipertahankan.

Kenyataan Anwar memang benar. Walaupun negara Islam berpura pura
memberi kebebasan, namun pada hakikatnya mengharamkan kebebasan
sehingga melanggar semua undang undang dan perjanjian perjanjian.
Akhirnya negara Islam menjadi miskin dan durjana.

Contohnya, larangan bermain mercun. Kalau lah ia berkesan, lain
ceritalah, tetapi pada hakikatnya, makin banyak yang cedera. Yang
untung orang rasuah dan gengster sahaja. Yang rugi rakyat, bukan
sahaja dari segi wang tetapi dari segi pengetahuan dan keseronokan
hidup.

UMNO sahaja mahu seronok dengan wang banyak penuh dengan rasuah,
biarkan rakyat menjadi miskin dan tertindas. Tetapi janji kebebasan
berlambak lambak. Lain cakap lain yang dibuat.

Saya nasihati supaya UMNO jangan jadi bongka. Apa yang terjadi
diMesir, Libya dan sekarang Syria, akan terjadi diMalaysia juga. Saya
juga pernah berjumpa dengan askar yang tidak senang dengan gelagat
UMNO. Jangan anggap bahawa mentang mentang UMNO menubuhkan kerajaan,
semua anggota Polis dan Tentera akan menyokong semua tindakan UMNO.



http://www.anwaraidc.com/?p=26686

Ideologi Kebebasan – Senjata Terakhir Anwar
Published by AIDC on August 7, 2012 | 9 Comments

AIDCNews – 7/08/12 – Semalam, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim menyiarkan
artikel bertajuk "Tiada Kebebasan Punca Malapetaka Di Negara Islam" di
laman peribadinya, anwaribrahimblog.com.

Artikel salinan dari Malaysiakini.com itu merupakan laporan intipati
ucapan Anwar di kawasan parlimen anaknya, Lembah Pantai.

"Dengan memetik karya terbaru ulama tersohor Yusuf al-Qaradhawi
bertajuk 'Kebangkitan Rakyat' yang ditulis selepas kejatuhan regim
Hosni Mubarak , Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim berkata,
punca malapetaka di negara Islam adalah disebabkan oleh tiada
kebebasan diberikan kepada rakyatnya," lapor portal pro-Anwar itu yang
memberi dua maksud tersirat.

Pertama, seperti kebiasaannya, Anwar akan berselindung di sebalik
tokoh-tokoh ulama besar seperti Dr Yusof Al Qaradawi ketika berhadapan
dengan masyarakat muslim dan berselindung di sebalik tokoh-tokoh
falsafah barat seperti John Locke ketika berhadapan dengan masyarakat
bukan Islam.

Kedua, agenda utama yang mahu disampaikan Anwar adalah tema kebebasan
yang menjadi intipati perjuangan PKR sejak mutakhir ini.

Tidak mengejutkan Anwar sekali lagi menggunakan nama Dr Yusof Al
Qaradawi kerana di Indonesia kumpulan Islam Liberal sering
berselindung dalam pembawaan agenda mereka di sebalik nama 'keluarga
Hassan Al Banna'.

"Nama 'al-Banna' memang banyak dikutip oleh kaum liberal untuk
menjustifikasi pendapatnya. Untuk membetulkan justifikasi fahaman
Pluralisme Agama, dalam bukunya, 'Islam dan Pluralisme', Jalaluddin
Rakhmat juga mengutip pendapat Jamal al-Banna,(tokoh Islam Liberal
Mesir) dengan menekankan, "Jamal al-Banna adalah aktivis Muslim,
anggota al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun. Kita mungkin menyebutnya fundamentalis
dan anti-Barat," kata Dr Adian Husaini pengkaji Islam Liberal
Indonesia.

Sila baca pandangan Dr Adian, "Islam Liberal bertopeng nama keluarga
Hassan Al Banna" dan bandingkan apa yang dilakukan Anwar di Malaysia
seperti dikupas GA, "Tanpa Qardawi…Tariq Ramadan pun Jadi…"

Agenda kebebasan merupakan senjata terakhir Anwar, namun ia tidak
begitu difahami oleh kebanyakan rakyat Malaysia, berbanding dengan
George Soros dari OSI (Open Society Institute) atau Carl Gershman dari
NED (National Endowment for Democracy).

Bahkan pada penaja-penaja yang didalangi Yahudi di Barat, agenda
kebebasan (freedom) dan hak asasi manusia (human rights) adalah
intipati utama dalam kerangka 'demokrasi' mereka di dunia Islam.

Supaya nampak lebih indah, Anwar bawakan agenda demokrasi barat itu
dengan jenama baru yang lebih berbau Islamik yang diistilahkannya
sebagai "Islam dan Demokrasi" (baca : Demokrasi Liberal).

Make up Islamik itu sengaja dibaluti terhadap batang tubuh 'demokrasi'
supaya tidak menakutkan umat Islam dan menyembunyikan agenda sebenar
yang berselindung di sebalik kata-kata Islamik itu.

Untuk pemahaman lanjut, sila baca; "Anwar, Islam & Demokrasi :
Ideologi & Dana" dan "Di sebalik Agenda 'Islam & Demokrasi' Anwar,
Azizah & Nurul Izzah".

Persoalan kedua, kecenderungan Anwar dan PKR memperguna nama Dr Yusof
Al Qaradawi pernah ditegur oleh pembaca harakahdaily, malah bekas
peguam Anwar sendiri YB Datuk Zulkifli Noordin pernah mendedahkan
bahawa ulama tersohor itu pernah diperdaya untuk kepentingan politik
Anwar.

"Dr Yusof Qardawi memberi pandangan supaya berhati-hati dengan Anwar
Ibrahim" kata SongkokPutih bekas ketua pengarang laman tertua pro-PAS,
Tranungkite.

Kenyataan Songkok Putih diperkukuhkan lagi dengan Azmin Ali yang
berkata Anwar pernah siasat Yusof selama 5 jam ketika Anwar menjadi
'wacth dog' Presiden Bush.

Ustaz Nasharuddin Mat Isa, bekas Timbalan Presiden PAS berkata fatwa
Yusof mengharamkan LGBT, ""Tidak boleh kita menyatakan sokongan kepada
mereka..tidak boleh makan bersama mereka..tidak boleh minum bersama
mereka…Ini pandangan Syeikh Yusof Al Qaradawi..kepada semualah yang
banyak merujuk kepada Syeikh Yusof Qadawi..saya harap baca kenyataan
ini..Jangan ambil pandangan Yusof Qaradawi atau ulama-ulama lain,
cetusan-cetusan tertentu, untuk mengiayakan, menjustifikasi perbuatan
kita sahaja, tetapi perkara yang menyentuh dasar-dasar Fiqh Islam itu
ditinggalkan begitu sahaja."

Kenapa masyarakat Islam tidak begitu memahami agenda sebenar yang mahu
dibawa Anwar ? Sebabnya cara pembawaan Anwar yang 'kabur' dan sering
berselindung di sebalik ayat Al Quran dan hadis Nabi serta nama tokoh-
tokoh ulama tersohor.

Sebenarnya, semua itu sekadar topeng untuk mengelirukan orang ramai.

Senator Ezam Mohd Nor pernah ditanya, "Antara Sheikh Yusuf Qardhawi
dengan Paul Wolfowitz, Anwar lebih baik dengan siapa ?, bekas orang
kanan Anwar itu menjawab, "Bagi saya, Anwar baik dengan semua. Baik
Wolfowitz dengan Qardhawi. Kalau nak kira rapat, dia lebih rapat
dengan Dato Nallakarupan". Baca selanjutnya sila klik di sini.

Namun, sikap tidak berterus terang Anwar ini juga menimbulkan masalah
pemahaman di kalangan ahli-ahli PKR sendiri, sehingga ke peringkat
terpaksa menggunakan pihak ketiga untuk menjelaskan hala tuju PKR.

"Pagi tadi, kita berdiri..kita menyanyikan lagu parti kita
(PKR)..kebebasan..kebebasan rakyat kita..kita ulang berkali-
kali..kebebasan..kebebasan..apa maksud kebebasan ?

"Adakah ia hanya satu perkataan..yang kita laungkan dengan
semudahnya..atau ia adalah satu perspektif yang perlu kita lihat..dari
semua segenap aspek untuk kita mencapai apakah itu kebebasan",kata
Fadiah Nadwa Fikri, wakil Lawyers for Liberty (LFL) memberi penerangan
kepada ahli-ahli PKR semasa Kongres PKR ke-8, di Johor.

Pada 14 April 2005, ketika Anwar berucap di Kelab Country Paradise,
Taman Melawati, Kuala Lumpur, beliau telah bersusaha membentuk hala
tuju baru PKR itu kepada para penyokongnya.

"Saya bukan orang pintar dan menganggap saya terlalu besar
peranannya..Saya hanya pekerja kecil, kebetulan diberikan kesempatan
dan kepercayaan, saya nak manfaatkannya.

"Saya sebutkan ini bukan untuk membanggakan diri..tetapi untuk
menyatakan..kita pejuang kebebasan dan keadilan tidak harus merasa
kecil..dunia yang berfikir tau siapa kita.

"Saya diiktiraf bukan kerana saya Anwar Ibrahim, kerana mereka tahu
saya mendokong cita-cita yang saudara-saudari dokong bersama,"katanya.

Ucapan di Kelab Country Paradise itu dibuat ketika Anwar pulang
bercuti dari Amerika Syarikat (AS).

Sepanjang berada di AS selama hampir 2 tahun, Anwar banyak terlibat
dalam aktiviti-aktiviti demokrasi yang didalangi kumpulan Yahudi AS.

Untuk mengetahui lebih lanjut apa yang dilakukan Anwar ketika di AS,
sila baca "Di Sebalik Status Anwar Sebagai 'Pengajar'", "Di Sebalik
Status Anwar Sebagai 'Pengajar' (2)" dan "Di Sebalik Status Anwar
Sebagai 'Pengajar' (3)"

Anwar juga turut meletakkan dirinya dalam kalangan kumpulan 'Mont
Pelerin Society,', iaitu satu kumpulan yang didalangi Yahudi untuk
membawa agenda liberal dan pasaran bebas di seluruh dunia.

Senjata ideologi ciptaan Mont Pelerin Society, itu dibawa Anwar ke
Malaysia untuk dijadikan agenda perjuangan Pakatan Rakyat dan senjata
terakhir untuk menawan Putrajaya.

Pemahaman lanjut, sila baca; "Awasi Senjata Terakhir Anwar", "Awasi
Senjata Terakhir Anwar II", "Awasi Senjata Terakhir Anwar III" dan
"Anwar Ibrahim Senjata Politik Neocon…"

Anwar pernah siasat Dr Yusof Al Qaradawi, 5 jam?

Konon Anwar rakan baik Wolfwitz, seorang Yahudi USA yang menuduh
Qardawi menghasut orang Islam membunuh rakyat USA. Tetapi mahu pula
menjelaskan dengan Qardawi bahawa dia disalah tafsirkan seperti yang
selalu dibuat oleh UMNO. Orang kata tidak sokong perkahwinan
homosexual, beberapa kali pun, masih dianggap menyokong sebab kata
undang undang Malaysia tentang homosexual sudah lapuk.

Memakan masa 5 jam? Untuk apa? Untuk menuduh atau meminta penjelasan.
Diceritakan pula tentang sekolah pondok Acheh. Wolfowitz bantah bantu
sekolah pondok Acheh, tetapi Anwar bantar sekeras kerasnya. Jadi Anwar
ini kawan baik Wolfowitz kah atau musuh dia? Kenapa mahu
mempertahankan sekolah ugama diAceh daripada seorang Yahudi???
Mentang mentang dia seorang Yahudi, dia dianggap sebagai binatang.
Orang Yahudi pun boleh memeluk ugama Islam, kamu tahukah? Kalau dia
beranggapan salah, kita betulkah lah dia. Lebih baik jadi kawan dari
jadi musuh tetapi tidak lah kita boleh tunduk kepada kemahuaannya yang
bertentangan dengan keadilan sejagat.


Anwar pernah siasat Dr Yusof Al Qaradawi, 5 jam – Azmin Ali
Published by AIDC on August 5, 2010 | 0 Comment

AGENDADAILY :Bagaimana dengan prasangka orang terhadap motif sebenar
Datuk Seri Anwar.Misalnya ada yang curiga terhadap hubungan akrabnya
dengan Timbalan Setiausaha Pertahanan Amerika Paul Wolfowitz yang
merupakan bakal CEO Bank Dunia?

AZMIN :Soal pandangan serong dan curiga tentang motif tu…itu tafsiran
dan pandangan masing-masing.Pokoknya kalau kita dapat berhujah dan
meyakinkan mereka..banyak masalah boleh selesai.


DSAI tidak bertemu dengan apa yang didakwa oleh kumpulan yang saya
kira desperate itu
…beliau bertemu dengan ulamak-ulamak besar.Misalnya beliau berada di
Qatar dan mengambil masa lima jam bertemu dan berbincang dengan Dr
Yusof Qardawi.

DSAI tidak bertemu dengan apa yang didakwa oleh kumpulan yang saya
kira desperate itu …beliau bertemu dengan ulamak-ulamak besar.Misalnya
beliau berada di Qatar dan mengambil masa lima jam bertemu dan
berbincang dengan Dr Yusof Qardawi.

Mengapa ini tidak jadi isu.Beliau juga bertemu dengan gerakan-gerakan
Islam di Eropah termasuk di London.Kenapa itu tidak jadi isu.Kenapa
harus fokus kepada satu dua individu sahaja?

Ini bermakna mereka yang main politik.Sepatutnya semua pertemuan DSAI
di luar negara itu didedahkan kepada umum supaya rakyat tengok beliau
bertemu pemimpin Barat dan juga Islam.Biar rakyat tahu apa
perbincangan yang berlangsung.

Memang Wolfowitz seorang yang dilihat sebagai keras dan angkuh…saya
tidak menafikan.DSAI juga mengakui..tetapi sekurang-kurangnya beliau
bersedia mengambil sikap terbuka untuk duduk dan berbincang dengan
DSAI.

Sebagai contoh.. pimpinan di Washington DC telah menyenaraihitamkan Dr
Yusof Qardawi…ulamak besar hari ini..yang diterima oleh majoriti umat
Islam.

Washington menyenaraihitam beliau semata-mata kerana beliau didakwa
pernah buat kenyataan boleh di bunuh orang awam Amerika
Syarikat..halal darah mereka.

Tetapi dalam pertemuan selama lima jam dengan Dr Yusof Qardawi …DSAI
mohon penjelasan betulkah beliau pernah mengeluarkan kenyataan seperti
itu… Dr Yusof Qardawi menafikan sekeras-kerasnya.

Anwar guna kesempatan dengan Wolfowitz…dan saya sendiri ada dalam
pertemuan itu, untuk jelaskan tanggapan terhadap tokoh besar Islam itu
tidak betul.

DSAI minta agar Washington betulkan persepsi ini.Makanya tanpa dialog
dengan Wolfowitz apakah kita mampu selesaikan masalah itu…sebab mereka
kuasa besar.Ini peranan DSAI.Satu lagi soal Tsunami di
Aceh..pendekatan yang diambil oleh Amerika ialah untuk membantu
pembangunan di Aceh tetapi mereka tidak mahu membantu sekolah-sekolah
yang ada unsur agama.

Inj juga DSAI bantah keras dalam pertemuan dengan Wolfowitz.DSAI
bagitau 90 peratus sekolah-sekolah di Aceh adalah sekolah-sekolah
agama pesantren,sekolah pondok…kalau kamu ambil sikap menyisihkan
mereka..makanya kamu bantu 10 peratus dan menafikan 90 peratus.

Kamu tidak boleh salahkan 90 peratus ini kalau mereka ambil dari
sumber lain yang ekstrim kerana mereka dalam keadaan terdesak akan
terima apa jua bantuan.

DSAI kata you kena engage dengan semua sekolah-sekolah di Aceh
termasuk sekolah-sekolah agama walaupun kamu tidak mahu dikaitkan
secara khusus dengan agama..sekurang-kurangnya kamu bantu dari segi
prasarana.

Ini makna melalui hubungan baik dengan Wolfowitz kita boleh berdebat
dan berhujah dengan jiwa yang merdeka.Kita tidak mahu hubungan yang
baik itu… kita tunduk kepada mereka.

Salah satu isu yang DSAI cakap kepada Wolfowitz..ialah menyatakan
pendirianya dan mendesak sementara Amerika minta tentera Syria keluar
dari Lebanon…DSAI kata saya setuju…tetapi kamu juga mesti keluar dari
bumi Iraq..mesti keluar dari Palestin…jangan double standard.

Saya harap soal pertemuan dengan Wolfowitz ini tidak jadi perkakas
politik oleh orang-orang yang desperate seperti Dr Chandra
Muzaffar..Ini orang yang sudah tidak relevan lagi…dia tidak tahu
senario politik.

Kami bertemu dengan tokoh-tokoh Amerika…kami datang dengan jiwa
merdeka..maknanya kami mampu berhujah dengan mereka.Ini saya saksi
sendiri.

Anwar tinggalkan Mercedes masuk FELDA?

Pelik juga. UMNO mahu Anwar bawa Mercedesnya masuk FELDA. Macamlah
jalan disana boleh menampung kereta besar macam Mercedes. Seolah olah
seorang pembangkang tidak boleh membawa kereta mewah. Saya juga hairan
bahawa ramai penyokong UMNO tidak tahu bahawa Anwar sewaktu pelajar
lagi memang sudah kaya. Bapa dia pada tahun 1970han adalah seorang MP
UMNO.

"Menurut seorang rakan di dalam PKR; Anwar terpaksa 'menangis, merayu
dan memujuk' sebelum mampu bertemu dengan ulama' besar itu. Yusof
Qaradawi katanya TIDAK MAHU berjumpa Anwar kerana statement-nya
menyokong Israel."

Tetapi pada hakikatnya, Qardawi berjumpa juga dengan Anwar, bukan.
Macamlah Qardawi ini budak budakan yang boleh dipujuk dengan tangisan.
BAhlul betul orang UMNO ini. Inilah ashik dengan fitnah, perkara bodoh
pun tidak dapat dilihat.

Tajuk artikle ini pula mengatakan bahawa Anwar menggelabah tentang isu
Palestin, tetapi fakta yang ditunjukkan pula mengatakan bahawa Qardawi
BERJUMPA DENGAN ANWAR.

Saya sendiri tidak tahu Qardawi berjumpa dengan Anwar tetapi pos ini
yang bagi tahu aku. Namun, rumusan dan tajuk langsung tidak masuk
akal. Lain fakta, lain pula rumusan. Apa lagi tajuk.

Apa yang UMNO sokong? Satu negeri sahaja di Palestin atau 2 negeri,
Palestin dan Israel? Anwar sokong 2 negeri sebab sekarang baru ada 1
negeri, iaitu Israel. UMNO mahu palestin ujud tanpa negerikah? Atau
mahu menghapuskan Israel dengan kekuatan tentera. Kalau UMNO ashik
mengapu USA dan Israel, bagaimana mahu Israel hapus. Bererti orang
UMNO ini TIDAK MAHU ADA PALESTIN UJUDLAH!!!!

Jahanam betul UMNO ini. Kejam betul terhadap rakyat Palestin yang
ditindas. Sanggup menidakkan kenegaraan Palestin, gara gara mahu
memfitnah Anwar.


http://www.anwaraidc.com/?p=22011

Isu Israel Buat Anwar Mengelabah..
Published by AIDC on February 21, 2012 | 41 Comments

GA – Ramai juga rakan-rakan aktivis lama reformasi yang mengikut
kunjungan DSAI ke kawasan Pekan kelmarin. Bukan sangat nak sokong
Anwar; tetapi nak tengok persediaan UMNO Pekan untuk mempertahan
kawasan daripada kemasukan Anwar.

Anwar pun bijak. Dia tinggal Mercedez kat stesen minyak; lepas tu naik
kapchai sama-sama dengan budak muda masuk ke FELDA. Orang pun tak
berapa perasan. Tiba-tiba Anwar dah sampai.

Bukan main juga orang FELDA puji Anwar. Jiwa rakyat. Sanggup bersusah
dengan rakyat. Sanggup naik motor masuk ke FELDA. Dia orang seronok.

Tapi, di kalangan aktivis reformasi perasan – Anwar tak macam biasa.
Fikiran Anwar nampak celaru. Habis semua gambar, buku yang Anwar
tunjuk konon dia masih diterima sebagai pemimpin Islam di dunia Arab.

Kita kena sama-sama baca tulisan Zabidi Yusoff dalam Malaysiakini:-

Oleh Zabidi Yusoff

Semasa saya menulis ini, Datuk Seri Anwar dan isteri sedang menjadi
tetamu kepada dua pemimpin Islam tersohor di dunia, Sheikh Yusuf Al-
Qardawi dan juga Khalid Mish'al di Doha, Qatar.

Sheikh Yusuf adalah ulamak terkemuka dan juga ulamak buat Ihwanul
Muslimin. Khalid Mish'al pula adalah pejuang dan pemimpin Hamas,
organisasi yang memerintah Gaza dan dilabel kontroversi kerana dicop
organisasi teroris olih Amerika dan Israel.

Tetapi, dengan taktik yang baru, di mana Khalid telah mula berlembut
dengan bersetuju akan 'resolusi 2 negara' (2 state solution), maka
kebarangkali usaha untuk mendapatkan keamanan di rantau itu adalah
amat besar.

Dalam tempoh seminggu sahaja, Anwar telah pun menemui pemimpin-
pemimpin dunia Islam dalam rangka mengiratkan persaudaraan seperti
Perdana Menter Recep Tayyip Erdogan dan kabinet beliau, Ketua Bank
Pembangunan Islam, Dr Ahmad Muhammad Ali, pendokong tegar Palestin,
Sheikh Abdul Qadir,warga negara Saudi, Imam Masjid di Mekah, pemimpin
masyarakat Islam setempat, Sheikh Kabbali, A Gafur Amin, Dr Umar
Jamjum dari Universiti King Abdul Aziz, Dr Abdul Hamid Sulayman,
Ulamak Sheikh Ahmad Muhammad Alawi Maliki, dan juga Secretary General
OIC, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu.

Kita minta Zabidi perjelaskan, bahawa Syeikh Yusof al-Qaradawi pada
hakikatnya TIDAK MAHU berjumpa Anwar; tetapi Anwar terpaksa
menggunakan cara yang lebih memalukan dalam mendapatkan masa Syeikh
Yusof.

Menurut seorang rakan di dalam PKR; Anwar terpaksa 'menangis, merayu
dan memujuk' sebelum mampu bertemu dengan ulama' besar itu. Yusof
Qaradawi katanya TIDAK MAHU berjumpa Anwar kerana statement-nya
menyokong Israel.

Apakah benar kenyataan itu? Boleh kita minta Zabidi Yusoff berikan
cerita sebenar…

Fwd: Anwar sokong perkahwinan homosexual?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj. Ahmad" <othm...@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 26, 2:10 pm
Subject: Anwar sokong perkahwinan homosexual?
To: soc.culture.malaysia


Datu Dr. Hassan Ali ini pula berkata:
"Hassan berkata maksud sokongan itu perlu dibaca secara keseluruhan
dan bukannya memilih ayat-ayat
tertentu."

Yang sedihnya, dia sendiri memilih perkataan perkataan tertentu untuk
memberi maksud penulis asal.
"the sanctity of marriage between men and women", bererti kemuliaan
perkahwinan.

Kemudian:
"Surendran: Dalam ayat ketiga "We need to review them. We do not
promote homosexuality in public sphere and domain". Adakah ayat itu
menunjukkan Anwar menyokong homoseksual?

Hasan: Ya"

Dengan perkataan ini pun, bererti Anwar sokong perkahwinan
homosexual???
Ada perkataan SOKONG disitu? Perkataan tidak sokong berkali kali
dinyatakan oleh Anwar, dan perkataan SOKONG homosexual langsung tidak
ada, namun Dr. Hassan ini pula membuat kesimpulan bahawa Anwar sokong
perkahwian homosexual. Bukan fitnah kah ini? Cuma orang bodoh UMNO
sahaja percaya bahawa ini bererti Anwar sokong perkahwinan homosexual.

Mungkin bukan perkahwinan tetapi homosexual, seperti yang menuduh
Anwar beberapa kali dengan saksi saksi yang telah pun mengaku
berbohong DIDALAM MAHKAMAH ITU SENDIRI! Namun tuduhan pertama bukan
pengakuan berbohong yang diterima! Hakim apa itu!
Saiful(28 tahun) pula mengaku diROGOL oleh Anwar(65 tahun), tetapi
menunggu berminggu minggu untuk melapurkan kes rogol ini, dan setelah
berjumpa dengan Najib dan beberapa lagi pegawai polis lain, sebelum
membuat lapuran resmi. Lepas itu pula, lapuran doktor pertama tidak
pula diterima.
Undang undang apa ini?

"Semasa pemeriksaan semula oleh peguam Datuk Firoz Hussein Ahmad
Jamaluddin yang mewakili Utusan Malaysia, bahawa perkataan 'review
archaic laws', 'punitive', 'punishment not relevant' dan 'public
spehere and domain' membawa maksud kegiatan homoseksual boleh
dihalalkan, Hasan berkata pada bacaannya ia bermaksud menghalalkan
kegiatan homoseksual"

Jika kamu telah berhadapan dengan hakim hakim Malaysia yang
menggunakan hukum civil untuk menuduh Anwar melakukan aktiviti
homoseksual, kamu patut fahamlah erti "arcaic laws", "punitive",
"punishment not relevan", "public sphere and domain".

Hukum civil, bukan hukum Islam. Anwar mahu dibicarakan didalam hukur
Islam tetapi ditolak oleh hakim BN ini, padahal jelas sekali didalam
perlembagaan bahawa orang Islam perlu dibicarakan oleh hukum Islam.

Hukum Islam memerlukan 4 orang saksi yang betul betul nampak. Kalau
tidak, ia akan dianggap sebagai FITNAH.
Nah, memang jelas sekali UMNO sudah bersalah membuat FITNAH sebab
tidak cukup saksi. Apa lagi mahu fikir panjang panjang. Dari segi
hukum syarak, UMNO sudah bersalah. Tidak perlu hakim menentukan lagi.
Kita semua boleh gunakan otak kita, dan hukum semua hakim hakim UMNO
itu. Kalau tidak kita semua masuk neraka.

Kalau pun archai law, iaitu undang undang lapuk, ini ditujukan kepada
hukum Islam lah. Dr. Hassan kata undang undang Islam tidak pandai
lapuk. Jadi buat apa majlis fatwah? Demikian juga undang undang civil.
Ia mesti direview mengikut keadaan zaman.

Mesej Anwar sebenarnya mendalam, tetapi dia memang konsisten dari
dahulu lagi. Tahun 1980 sejak saya mula kenal dengan pendirian Anwar.
Dia seorang Islam progressif, bukan jenis PAS, terutama sekali PAS
dahulu. DiSAbah, memang sudah lama kami begini disebabkan keadaan.
Sebab itu lah kami merasa lain dengan kempen PAS.

Kes Saman Anwar : Mahkamah Diberitahu Temu Bual Di BBC Sokong
Homoseksual
Published by AIDC on August 14, 2012 | 6 Comments

AIDCNews – 14/08/12 – Bekas Pesuruhjaya PAS Selangor, Datuk Dr Hasan
Ali yang turut dipanggil menjadi saksi memberitahu Mahkamah Tinggi
semalam bahawa temu bual Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim dengan badan
penyiaran British, BBC, mengenai undang-undang berkaitan homoseksual
yang disiarkan pada 12 Jan lepas, membawa maksud supaya menyokong
kegiatan itu.

Semasa pemeriksaan balas oleh peguam N.Surendran yang mewakili Anwar,
Hassan berkata maksud sokongan itu perlu dibaca secara keseluruhan dan
bukannya memilih ayat-ayat tertentu.

Surendran: Anwar telah mengatakan "We Muslims and non-Muslims in
Malaysia generally believe and committed to support the sanctity of
marriage between men and women". Berdasarkan pendapat anda, adakah
ayat ini menunjukkan Anwar tidak menyokong homoseksual?

Hasan: Yang Arif saya membaca keseluruhan ayat. Ayat pertama dan ayat
kedua (but we should not be seen to be punitive and consider the
archaic law as relevant) tidak dapat berdiri dengan sendirinya dan ia
tidak memberi maksud homoseksual tidak diterima.

Surendran: Kalau kita lihat ayat kedua, adakah anda setuju 'archaic
law' adalah undang-undang lapuk?
Hasan: Saya tak setuju sebab kelapukan tidak pernah berlaku dalam
undang-undang Islam.

Surendran: Berdasarkan kenyataan "We Muslims and non-Muslims in
Malaysia generally believe and committed to support the sanctity of
marriage between men and women" adakah Anwar menyokong institusi
perkahwinan antara lelaki dan perempuan?

Hasan: Ya setuju.

Surendran: Dalam ayat ketiga "We need to review them. We do not
promote homosexuality in public sphere and domain". Adakah ayat itu
menunjukkan Anwar menyokong homoseksual?

Hasan: Ya

Surendran: Anda pasti dengan jawapan itu?
Hasan: Ya

Surendran: Saya cadangkan kepada anda ayat ini tidak sokong
homoseksual tapi sokong perkahwinan.

Hasan: Saya tak setuju

Hasan juga turut disoal balas oleh seorang lagi peguam Anwar, Latheefa
Koya berkenaan dengan aktiviti homoseksual di tempat persendirian
bukan merupakan satu jenayah jika dibandingkan dengan di khalayak
umum.

Hassan menjawab, dalam hukum Islam dosa tetap dianggap satu jenayah
tidak kira ia dilakukan secara sembunyi atau terang-terangan.

Latheefa:Adakah anda tahu perbezan antara dosa dengan jenayah.

Hasan: Saya tak pasti.

Latheefa: Saya cadangkan kepada anda sesuatu kegiatan yang dilakukan
dalam Islam boleh dianggap sebagai dosa tetapi sekiranya tidak
dilakukan di hadapan khalayak ramai, ia tidak boleh dijadikan sebagai
jenayah. Adakah anda setuju?

Hasan: Tidak setuju. Sama ada di tempat awam atau tertutup, kalau itu
tidak dibolehkan (berdosa), maka ia tetap tidak dibolehkan.

Hasan, saksi defendan pertama, berkata demikian pada perbicaraan kes
saman Anwar terhadap Utusan Melayu (Malaysia) Bhd dan ketua
pengarangnya Datuk Abdul Aziz Ishak berhubung artikel mengenai komen
Anwar bersama BBC mengenai undang-undang berkaitan homoseksual.

Pada 20 Januari lalu, Anwar memfailkan saman fitnah itu bagi menuntut
ganti rugi RM50 juta, atas dakwaan telah menerbitkan dua artikel di
muka hadapan dan muka surat 10 akhbar Utusan Malaysia bertarikh 17
Januari tahun ini berhubung temu bualnya bersama BBC.

Semasa pemeriksaan semula oleh peguam Datuk Firoz Hussein Ahmad
Jamaluddin yang mewakili Utusan Malaysia, bahawa perkataan 'review
archaic laws', 'punitive', 'punishment not relevant' dan 'public
spehere and domain' membawa maksud kegiatan homoseksual boleh
dihalalkan, Hasan berkata pada bacaannya ia bermaksud menghalalkan
kegiatan homoseksual.

Perbicaraan bersambung 23 Oktober ini.

Anwar menipu Qardawi kah?

Dengar betul betul video Zul Nordin ini.
Siapa yang menipu Qardawi? Anwar kah atau Zul Noordin?
Ini lah kelemahan Anwar dan juga kelebihan Anwar. Dia terlalu percaya
dengan penipu penipu macam Zul Noordin ini. Namun ia juga kekuatan
Anwar, sebab dia sanggup berdakwah kepada mereka yang kurang Iman
macam mereka ini, supaya mereka insaf. Ini adalah antara risiko yang
kita hadapi untuk hidup didunia ini.
Seperti tuduhan PAS sewaktu Anwar masuk UMNO; Bagaimana membersihkan
tong najis kalu masuk dalam tong najis? Walaupun terbukti Anwar gagal,
namun saya sokong Anwar dalam hal ini. DiSabah pun kita terpaksa buat
begini. Sebab kawan kita semua pun bersikap najis najis semua. Namun
kita perlu menguatkan diri untuk berdakwah kepada mereka supaya faham
akan hukum Allah.

Berdakwah dengan tingkah laku, bukan dengan percakapan sahaja.

Risikonya, berkahwan dengan najis najis ini, kita pun dianggap najis
juga, macam siZul Nordin ini.
Dia yang menipu Qardawi, Anwar pula yang dituduh.
SEolah olah Qardawi ini seorang Ulama bodoh pula.
Dalam hukum Islam, menuduh seorang tanpa saksi penuh, memang fitnah.
Tidak perlu Qardawi memerlukan bukti lanjut. Kalau UMNO cuma ada
seorang saksi sahaja, walaupun pun dengan DNA didalam buntut Saiful
selama 2 hari ditahan, walaupu sudah diperiksa beberapa kali oleh
doktor doktor. Bagaimana Qardawi boleh buat fatwah selain fatwah
bahawa ini adalah FITNAH belaka.


http://www.anwaraidc.com/?p=19629

Zul Noordin: Dr Yusuf Qardawi Deceived
Published by AIDC on December 8, 2011 | 0 Comment

AIDCNews – 8/12/11 – Member of Parliament for Kulim-Bandar Baru, Datuk
Zulkifli Noordin has admitted to have deceived renowned cleric Syeikh
Dr Yusuf Qardawi into issuing a fatwa supporting the sodomy II case
involving Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and his aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari
Azlan.

"We have made a mistake…we admit making the mistake. I was among those
who made the mistake, and I must meet up with Syeikh Yusuf Qardawi to
make amendments.

"Because…we wish to inform (that) it was true we had deceived Syeikh
Yusuf Qardawi into believing that Anwar had been slandered," he said.

As Anwar's lawyer, Zulkifli had prepared biased questions to elicit
the fatwa from Dr Yusuf Al Qardawi in 2009.

According to him, he was responsible in preparing the questions, which
sided Anwar and hiding the truth about the complainant, Mohd Saiful.

"I was the one who gave the briefing and prepared the questions
couched in specific forms to persuade and convince Syeikh Yusuf
Qardawi that Anwar had been slandered…that was how it was pictured.

"We completely avoided the truth about the case, (for example) that
Saiful was Anwar's employee…we didn't tell him about Saiful
complaining that he had been sodomised.

"We (only) described that there was slander in this sodomy case. When
he understood the way we put it, Syeikh Yusuf Qardawi immediately
issued the 'Qazaf' fatwa,"

Zulkifli, who was one of Anwar's defence lawyers in the sodomy I trial
(1998), also admitted what he did was wrong and sinful because he went
to the extent of lying to the respected cleric just to save Anwar's
reputation and image.

"Looking back, we find we have committed much sin relating to this
matter…to the extent that we even had the audacity to deceive a cleric
of such stature in believing that the issue faced by Anwar was one of
slander – an issue that needed to be addressed through Qazaf.

"That was why I spoke in parliament…we have made a mistake and I am
asking our colleagues not to persist in doing the same.

"Alhamdulillah, Allah has made me realise. I still have the time to
meet certain people and ask for apologies…and I have done so.

"I have the responsibility to meet him (Syeikh Yusuf Qardawi) to
explain and correct the situation, if it can still be corrected, that
is. If he refuses to accept it, then it will be his responsibility,
but at least I have tried to make amendments about what I have done,"
he said.

The Swearing

Besides that, Zulkifli also revealed other things that happened in
1998, which before this have not been told to the public.

This includes, the truth about Datuk Dr Haron Din and (the late) Dato'
Haji Ishak bin Baharom (the former Mufti of Selangor), who demanded
that Anwar take an oath to clear his name.

Also revealed was the truth about Anwar's 'swearing' at Lokman Noor
Adam's house in Batu Pahat, Johor and at the National Mosque in 1998.

According to him, from 1998 until now Anwar has yet to perform an
oath.

"We, as Muslims, should at least ask about this. Whether it is
convincing or otherwise is a different matter, but at least it is
something that we ought to do.

"Why is it so difficult (to take an oath)? Why is it so difficult to
provide a DNA sample? What's the problem in giving the Omega watch? It
is immaterial whether we believe or not, but yet again, at least we
have tried.

"I wish to reiterate one more time…please don't do the same mistake we
did by not asking…it was our biggest misgiving," he added.

Debt of Honour: Tom Clancy

Interesting book. It predicts 911 disaster, and explains about future
air and naval battles.

Saturday 25 August 2012

Anwar ahli Freemason?

http://www.anwaraidc.com/?p=26951
Anwar Freemason? Tun Mustapha pun di tuduh ahli Freemason. Dalam
selidik saya, tiada masala lah menjadi ahli freemason. Sama juga jadi
ahli rotary Club dll. Namun, terdengar cerita ini kembali, ingat pula
aku cerita Tun Mustapha. Dikaji dengan fitnah fitnah UMNO yang lain,
saya sekarang sudah pasti ini adalah fitnah belaka, untuk merampas
hasil Sabah dan saya telah bersalah kerana tidak menguatkan kesangsian
saya. Freemason adalah persatuan Yahudi yang amat rahsia? Kenapa buka
rahsia sekarang? Hubungan UMNO dengan Yahudi memang terbukti kuat,
maklumlah dua dua gila wang. Tida mustahil, propaganda ini dari UMNO
yang membayar Freemason untuk merosakkan nama 2 pejuang Islam. Kedua
dua taat kepada hukum Islam dan berani bersuara tentang Islam.

Azmin di buang Emak

http://www.anwaraidc.com/?p=26986

Baca disitu. Azmin Diberi 2 syarat baru boleh jumpa emak. Patutlah.

Tuesday 21 August 2012

living under a cruel government

http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/8/21/business/11886768&sec=business

Thank you opposition parties. You wake me up to the cruelty committed
against me these last few decades. How could I be so foolish to
believe in government propaganda.

I had to endure debts that destroy my income. It is the worst taxation
ever. I used to believe that cars are not necessities but trying to
travel by bus is both dangerous and a wate of time and money.

The high taxation was promised to give better road, public
transportation and better job prospects as a result of a good car
industry. All are just false promises. Developed nations like Japan
and UK, recently developed nations like Korea and Taiwan, have much
better road, public transport and car industry despite not having high
car taxations that are ultimately paid by every citizen.

Now the government want to compare itself with similarly corrupt and
backward nations like Indonesia and Philippines that both suffer from
acute dictatorships? This is evidence enough that Malaysia had suffer
red from similar dictatorsip illness due to its censored newspapers
and curbs on opposition parties, where stupid lies like this attached
article are forced fed to the people.

Now I had to pay for my stupidity. I spent my time paying for high car
taxes without any improvement in my quality of life. The government is
supposed to help the citizens, not squeeze them hard. It was much
better under the British colony. We cannot get jobs easily without
paying a lot of money to get useless degrees that cannot guarantee
jobs. This was despite not having natural resources like oil palm and
petroleum. Now, we are lucky if our children work in our home towns.

Now the article below claimed that to reduce car tax will make
citizens lose money because they cannot sell it back? Just refund the
tax lah! Is it so difficult to do? If you claim that it will reduce
the development projects, it was just a repeat of all the previous
lies. Don't develop lah! It is the people who develop. Once the people
have money, only then will the nations develop like Korea, Taiwan and
Hong Kong!

Even now, despite burdened by high car taxes, we are still burdened by
road tolls, road taxes and insurances. Our road tax is lower than
Thailand? Combine it with exorbitant car tax and loan shark car park
operators, then you can get the true picture. Malaysia has the highest
government overall tax without anything to show for it.

Traffic jams get worse instead of getting less.



Revised NAP likely to include policy to reduce car prices over next
3-4 years

PETALING JAYA: The revised National Automotive Policy (NAP) will
include a policy that will address the gradual reduction of car prices
in the country, said an industry source.

"The Government, through the Malaysia Automotive Institute (MAI), had
engaged us in the past few months to discuss on the matter," he told
StarBiz.

"There will be a policy that will tackle the gradual reduction of car
prices in Malaysia. Details of this policy are expected to be made
public in the near future," he added.

The source said the policy would outline a structure to gradually
reduce car prices over the next three to four years.


What happens to second-hand cars? Naza Group of Companies joint
executive chairman SM Nasarudin SM Nasimuddin was quoted in a recent
report as saying: if prices dropped, the resale value of a car would
then plummet but the loan amount owed to banks (on cars already
bought) would be unchanged.
The Government has been considering it (the reduction of car prices)
in the revised NAP and it was only a matter of time for this issue to
be addressed," said the industry source.

It is a known fact that the prices of cars are high in Malaysia
compared with Thailand.

However, it has been argued that the cost of vehicle ownership in
Malaysia is still among the most competitive in the Asean region,
primarily due to the subsidised fuel prices, cheaper road tax and
insurance premiums.

In a recent news report, MAI chief executive officer Madani Sahari was
quoted as saying that Malaysia had the second lowest cost of vehicle
ownership in the region after the Philippines.

According to him, the cost of vehicle ownership in Malaysia, compared
to Thailand and Indonesia, was lower by 39% and 12% respectively.

In terms of petrol prices, Thailand was the highest, followed by
Singapore, Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines, Madani said in the
news report.

Meanwhile, on the point of car prices being slashed overnight via the
reduction of vehicle excise duties, industry observers argue that the
impact would be negative for existing buyers rather than first-time
ones.

"If you're a first-time buyer, it would be like a dream come true as
it means you can now afford to buy a car that was too expensive
previously," said one industry observer who requested anonymity.

"For the existing buyer, it would mean that the resale value of the
car would have diminished overnight," he added.

It is also argued that the sudden drop in vehicle prices would have a
severe impact on second-hand car dealers.

Those servicing existing car loans will also be severely affected.

In a local news report recently, Naza Group of Companies joint
executive chairman SM Nasarudin SM Nasimuddin was quoted as saying
that if taxes were scrapped, consumers would have to overpay bank
loans taken for their vehicles.

In the report, Nasarudin claimed that if prices dropped, the resale
value of a car would then plummet but the loan amount owed to banks
would be unchanged.

pengalaman dalam pentadbiran diktator

konon diharamkan! Semua orang main juga. Kecederaan jadi juga. Yang
untung gangster dan pegawai rasuah. Yang rugi, rakyat biasa bukan saja
dari segi wang, tetapi kesyhiokan dan ilmu. Inilah yg terjadindinegara
diktator.

Thursday 16 August 2012

Re: Experience designing the simplest CPU

I used the schematic design entry with verilog as its output,
generated by Megawizard code generator. The PC uses a synchronous up
counter, which can be loaded. We need to add additional logic. I have
just learned this block editor. In fact a lot of time is spent trying
to familiarise myself with the connecting methods. Wasted a lot of
time not using the rubber banding option. Should have been the
default. I tried to use conduit but was not what I thought it was. I
was trying to relabel the same bus with alternative names as used in
the book but failed. In the end just use the last bus name.

For the ALU, I simply use the adder-subtractor. Not even a pass
through. Just add to a zero.

For the machine code generation. I shall use MPLAB IDE to produce hex
from binary. With only 16 instruction memory, programming should not
be difficult.

Experience designing the simplest CPU

With a textbook, good Altera Quartus II tutorial, from the vendor,
Terasic for the DE2-115, I thought I can easily design and test the
mano risc cpu.

In just a few hours, finished, but on compiling, no output at all.
Spent the next few hours deleting parts one by one, and yet, until
only the PLL oscillator left, still no output. The PLL was the same as
in the tutorial and yet no problem previously. Whatever the probem, it
was not due to the design. Must be some sort of licensing problems. I
use the free web edition of the Altera Quartus using the Megawizard
functions, in Verilog. The vendor tutorial uses Verilog.

The mano risc design looked simple until we actually implement it.
risc design requires 3-port RAM. Altera free edition only provides 2-
ported RAM. Luckily searching the internet provides inspiration for a
3-port design using a 2-ported RAM. No wonder RISC style of GP
registers was not popular in the early days. This 3-port design is
also the secret of RISC performance.

The book is almost complete, except the PC portion. Initially I wanted
to simplify it by using only branch on zero only, but adding the
negative condition is simple. I don't think it is wise to implement a
relative jump so I changed it to just offset jump, like PIC.

Tuesday 14 August 2012

Educational Computer Architecture

There is a list of:
ISO Hobbyist Computer Architecture

Also lists of open core computer architectures.

I am evaluating all these for educational purposes.

I had made a comparative lists of VHDL written cpu soft cores but I
have lost it but have chosen a few VHDL open core CPUs for learning
purposes. I even made it into an assignment for students.

1. Simulating Weijun Zhang VHDL CPU
2. Simulating Hamblen's MIPS
3. Simulating CQPIC

All are written using VHDL. However I notice that the industry is
going for Verilog so we may have to equip students with Verilog. I
have not gone deeper into this subject yet.

There are problems with learning about computer architecture using
these open cores. The most important is the lack of detailed
documentation. Ashenden may have written a book but I cannot find its
source code. The book is more about writing VHDL than about computer
architecture.

For me, language either VHDL or Verilog is a temporary phenomena.
After going through all the computer languages and design tools cycles
and developments, the most important aspect of learning is about the
fundamentals, not the specifics. These tools keep on evolving so we
must keep up but fundamentals never change.

So I now start looking for better educational computer architecture,
or computer organizations. It has to be extremely simple. The simplest
the better. It has to be better documeted, with links to logic design
principles. It can either written in any HDL, but it has to have
schematic diagrams.

Schematic diagrams help a lot in making people understand quickly. The
idea is to let even weak students understand computer
organization(hardware) and therefore computer architecture(ISA).

Learning about instruction set is one way of learning but not
complete. We can only simulate but there is something missing in not
being able to simulate the hardware and the information flows
graphically. There are available instruction set simulators for which
the iso computer architecture lists may include, but I have abandoned
it in favour of soft cores.

We now have free FPGA tools, especially from Altera Quartus II and
Modelsim. We can compile VHDL and Veriflog easily but it is still too
hard for many students. Graphical interface is vital towards
undestanding.

After scanning a few tex books about computer architecture, Stallings,
Mano, Hennessy, Tanenbaum, Hamacher, Murdocca, Cragon, I notice that
among the simplest is the one by Mano and Kime in the book Logic and
Compute Design fundamentals. I use this book for our Logic design
course but have not studied the computer design parts in detail until
a few weeks ago.

Mano described the computer design using state tables and diagrams.
For both single cycle as well as multicycle implementations. It is
complete. It even has zero insertion for immediate data.

I start googling for real implementations of Mano's processor.
The best implementiion for eduational use is this:
AC 2010-45: HDL BASED DESIGN PROBLEMS FOR COMPUTER
ARCHITECTURE , Chad E. Hager, Steven F. Barrett, Cameron H. G. Wright,
archived in http://search.asee.org

http://search.asee.org/search/fetch;jsessionid=1kf7y38dinafd?url=file%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%2FE%3A%2Fsearch%2Fconference%2F32%2FAC%25202010Full45.pdf&index=conference_papers&space=129746797203605791716676178&type=application%2Fpdf&charset=

The mano machine is documented in the wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mano_machine
The description may be wrong because it is not an accumulator based
CPU. It uses 2 operand addresses and 1 destination address.

Accumulator based CPU may be small, like PDP8 and PIC, but it is
difficult to implement, or is it to explain. Whereas as 3-addrss RISC
style, is much easier to explain as X = Y + Z, which is intuitive for
humans.

Is there any other open source machines which allow us to explain to
students in the easiest possible way?
Hopefully computer architecture will not viewed as being difficult.
Anyone should be able to understand the fundamentals.

Tanenbaum explains in his textbook about his processeor sthe Mic-1 to
Mic-4, but it appears to be too complex for beginning students.