Thursday 31 December 2009

Lowering IPTA Academic requirement will disqualify Malaysia's Engineering

Proposal to evaluate the award of IPTA degrees based only on 70%
academic achievement will mean that Malaysian Universities will fail
the Washington Accord agreement standards for engineering
qualification.

http://www.washingtonaccord.org/Rules_and_Procedures.pdf
SECTION C – GUIDELINES
1. GRADUATE PROFILE EXEMPLARS

Page 37 of 56


Even hands-on training is limited to 10% of the total credit hours,
let alone extra curricular activities.

If the hands-on exceed 10%, it means that we are training
technologists, i.e. technicians, not engineers. At least that is what
the current EAC director told us, and I happen to agree with him
fully.


http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v5/newsindex.php?id=465503


IPTA Admission Requirements Reviewed To Meet Job Market Demands -
Saifuddin
KUNDASANG (Sabah), Dec 31 (Bernama) -- The proposal to impose
admission requirement based on 70 per cent academic and 30 per cent co-
curriculum merit for public institutions of higher learning (IPTA) is
being considered to meet job market demands, Deputy Higher Education
Minister Datuk Saifuddin Abdullah said on Thursday.

At present, he said, the admission requirement for matriculation
students and Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) and Sijil Tinggi
Persekolahan Malaysia (STPM) holders was still based on 90 per cent
academic and 10 per cent co-curriculum merit.

"Right now, the selection of students to IPTA is done based on 90 per
cent academic and 10 per cent co-curriculum merit.

"But, once the students are accepted into the university, they will be
evaluated based on 70 per cent academic and 30 per cent co-curriculum
merit.

"When they graduate, the first thing their potential employers will
ask is about their experience and skills, not their academic results,
even for first-class degree holders.

"So, the proposed intake requirement is being considered because the
current job market demands a balance between academic results and co-
curriculum," he said after sending off Mohd Noor Mat Amin on his solo
mission to scale Mount Kinabalu, at the Kinabalu National Park near
here.

Saifuddin said some of the employers had even lamented on the quality
of fresh graduates, especially those who were inactive in co-
curriculum activities.

Hence, the deputy minister called on 152 students associations
nationwide to be proactive in organising more activities to increase
their co-curriculum merit.

-- BERNAMA

Re: Malaysia's court ruling: Allah is not exclusive to Islam

On Dec 31, 9:43 pm, Paul Saccani <sacc...@omen.net.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:55:56 -0800 (PST), "Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj.
>
> Ahmad" <othm...@lycos.com> wrote:
> >Even in Indonesia, where Allah is used sporadically in the translation
> >of the Bible, its use is discrete and are not meant to mislead, unlike
> >in Malaysia.
>
> >Allah is substituted for Jesus when it should be just god.
>
> Actually, it isn't.

Because you are completely arrogant and ignorant.

>
> >The bible
> >never uses the word Allah as a translation to God. Allah is not a
> >Malay word for God. The Malay word for God is Tuhan.
> >In Malay, Allah is meant to be the God of Muslims.
>
> Which in Islamic theology is the God of Abraham and Jesus - the self
> same God.

That is the god in Islamic theology, but certainly not the Christian
theology.
In Christianity, Jesus is himself the God, which is completely
nonsense in the Malay meaning of the word
Allah.

Prehistoric Arab may have used the word Allah to refer to one
particular god, but Muslim Arabs have redefined the meaning of Allah
to be the one god, according to the Islamic theology.

There is no such confusion in Malay. Allah in Malay is the one god
according to the Islamic theology. There is no pre-Islamic Malay word
for Allah, let alone to describe a deity. Only tuhan(supreme god) or
dewa-dewa. So Allah in Malay is the God as defined in Islamic
theology, not any god or deity.


>
> > Since the bible is
> >to be translated to Malaysian Malay, it must be translated according
> >to the normal rules of translation, not to mislead the readers.
>
> As the bible is a sacred text to Muslims, that is hardly going to
> happen, is it?

What are you trying to imply? You must be abosolutely lying if you
think Muslims consider the current translated bible as SACRED.

Malay muslims respect the translated quran in similar manner to
translated bible, i.e. with cautions. Malay muslims only respect the
original quran in Arabic words despite not understanding many Arabic
words.

This is similar to most Muslims all over the world, even Arabs who may
not completely understand the Arabic words and phrases used in the
Quran.

Any quran, that is to be translated to modern Arabic will never be
respected.
And you expect Muslims to respect the current Bibles in various
translated forms and consider them as sacred?
You are a complete moron.

>
> >Why on Earth should Christians in Malaysia want to use the word Allah
> >to describe God when the correct translation is Tuhan? Unless it is
> >attempting to mislead readers to consider that that Jesus is also the
> >god of the Malays, which is completely nonsense.
>
> Well, you see, there was fellow called Muhammad, and his message was
> that the God of the Christians and the God of the Jews was called
> Allah.

So what you are saying is that Jesus is also the Allah of the Muslims?
Bloody misleading arrogant bastard.

Unless it is the bible of some cultish Christianity that thrive in
Indonesia but this is frowned upon by mainstream Christianity.

I have to agree that these christianity cults who abandon the trinity
concept, and returning to true monotheism, should be allowed to use
the word Allah, but certainly not the bible used by Catholics. This is
true even if they don't accept Muhammad as a prophet.

Catholics and almost all protestants that I can name, believe in the
trinity concept where Jesus(son), Father and (Holy Spirit) are three
separate entities of god, to be treated as one.

From Wikipedia, at the top of Google search list:
"Trinity teaches the unity of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as three
persons in one Godhead.[1] "

To use the word Allah for this "Godhead" is just preposterous. It
implies that Jesus is also Allah, which is alien to the Malays.


>
> Some people heeded his message, and today they are called muslims.

You do not understand Islam at all. No wonder you are not a Muslim.
If you accept the true Malay meaning of Allah, I am sure muslims will
call you a Muslim, despite you denying Muhamamd. Got it!!! You don't
have to be a follower of Muhamamd to be called a Muslim, in Islam.

Alas, you and the christians in Malaysia, want to mislead Malays, into
thinking that the trinity, i.e. Jesus, is compatible with the Malay's
Allah, instead of just Tuhan.

If you do not consider this as misleading, you just an arrogant
bastard.


>
> Perhaps you could find someone who knows something about Islam to
> explain this to you?

So you think you know more about Islam than I do? That you don't need
anybody who knows anything about Islam to explain Islamic fundamentals
to you?


>
> >Just because Allah is not exclusive to Islam, does not mean that it
> >can be used without any just cause. Just because Koran is not
> >exclusive to Islam, does not mean that it can be used to translate the
> >word "Bible"  into Koran in Malay. This is what it amounts to.
>
> A reasonably educated Muslim should know better than this.

Yes, but you certainly isn't.

>
> >If the Christians want to translate the Bible to Malay, then use
> >proper Malay words and grammar. Usually poor Malay grammar and words
> >is an insult to the language and customs of the Malays and Muslims.
> >Use the correct word for God, i.e. Tuhan!!!
>
> That would be offensive to anyone who accepts that Muhammad was the
> messenger of God.

So you think Malays don't pray to "Tuhan"? Idiot bastard.
In fact, Malays pray to "Tuhan", not to Allah. Just read a few
prayers written in Malay for you to find out.
Allah is treated more like a name of a god, not the god entity itself.

Even Arabs use the word Ila, for God, not allah, and all muslims must
know how to distinguish between these two words, if not they are not
muslims.

Read the most important phrase in Islam: "La Ila ha ill allah"

Translated into English : No god except Allah.
Malay: Tiada Tuhan melainkan Allah.

Now tell me how can Christians in Malaysia be allowed to use the word
Allah for God when even Muslims use the word Tuhan to refer to God??

Unless they are trying to mislead the Malays about the trinity message
of Christianity.
Any honest person should be able to answer but you certainly are not
honest.

> --
> Cheers
> Paul Saccani
> Perth, Western Australia.

Malaysia's court ruling: Allah is not exclusive to Islam

Even in Indonesia, where Allah is used sporadically in the translation
of the Bible, its use is discrete and are not meant to mislead, unlike
in Malaysia.

Allah is substituted for Jesus when it should be just god. The bible
never uses the word Allah as a translation to God. Allah is not a
Malay word for God. The Malay word for God is Tuhan.

In Malay, Allah is meant to be the God of Muslims. Since the bible is
to be translated to Malaysian Malay, it must be translated according
to the normal rules of translation, not to mislead the readers.

Why on Earth should Christians in Malaysia want to use the word Allah
to describe God when the correct translation is Tuhan? Unless it is
attempting to mislead readers to consider that that Jesus is also the
god of the Malays, which is completely nonsense.

Just because Allah is not exclusive to Islam, does not mean that it
can be used without any just cause. Just because Koran is not
exclusive to Islam, does not mean that it can be used to translate the
word "Bible" into Koran in Malay. This is what it amounts to.

If the Christians want to translate the Bible to Malay, then use
proper Malay words and grammar. Usually poor Malay grammar and words
is an insult to the language and customs of the Malays and Muslims.
Use the correct word for God, i.e. Tuhan!!!

Malaysian court rules Catholic paper can use "Allah"
Royce Cheah
KUALA LUMPUR
Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:57am EST
Related News
School holidays in Malaysia, time for circumcision
Mon, Nov 23 2009
KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) - A Malaysian court ruled on Thursday that a
Catholic newspaper can use "Allah" to describe God in a surprise
judgment that could allay worries about the erosion of minority rights
in the majority Muslim country.

WORLD

The High Court said it was the constitutional right for the Catholic
newspaper, the Herald, to use the word "Allah."

"Even though Islam is the federal religion, it does not empower the
respondents to prohibit the use of the word," said High Court judge
Lau Bee Lan.

Last January, Malaysia banned the use of the word "Allah" by
Christians, saying the use of the Arabic word might offend the
sensitivities of Muslims who make up 60 per cent of Malaysia's 28
million population.

Analysts say cases such as that involving the Herald worry Malaysian
Muslim activists and officials who see using the word Allah in
Christian publications including bibles as attempts to proselytize.

The Herald circulates in Sabah and Sarawak on Borneo Island where most
tribal people converted to Christianity more than a century ago.

In February, the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Kuala Lumpur Murphy
Pakiam, as publisher of the Herald, filed for a judicial review,
naming the Home Ministry and the government as respondents.

He had sought to declare that the decision by the respondents
prohibiting him from using the word "Allah" in the Herald was illegal
and that the word "Allah" was not exclusive to Islam.

The Home Minister's decision to ban the use of the word was illegal,
null and void, said Lau.

Lawyers representing the government said they would refer to the Home
Ministry on whether to appeal.

"It is a day of justice and we can say right now that we are citizens
of one nation," said Father Lawrence Andrew, the Herald's editor.

Christians -- including about 800,000 Catholics -- make up about 9.1
percent of Malaysia's population. Malays are by definition Muslims and
are not allowed to convert.

Malaysia was rated as having "very high" government restrictions on
religion in a recent survey by the Pew Forum, bracketing it with the
likes of Iran and Egypt and it was the 9th most restrictive of 198
countries.

Published since 1980, the Herald newspaper is printed in English,
Mandarin, Tamil and Malay. The Malay edition is mainly read by tribes
in the eastern states of Sabah and Sarawak on Borneo Island.

Ethnic Chinese and Indians, who are mainly Christians, Buddhists and
Hindus, have been upset by court rulings on conversions and other
religious disputes as well as demolitions of some Hindu temples.

(Editing by Nick Macfie)

Lessons for those who believe Swine Flu is milder than Common Flu

Swine Flu is not fatal is well treated as shown by Germany, China and
Japan.

Only those who treat Swine Flu lightly suffer unnecessary deaths.
Without any treatment and ICU, Swine Flu is as deadly as Spanish Flu
of 1918. It is only the wide availability of Tamilflu that had reduced
fatalities. But those nations that enforce quarantine had fared much
better because their ICU facilities are not stretched.

China had done well at the early stages with its aggressive quarantine
but slacked with its quarantine as Swine Flu spreads to its regions.

Among developed nations, Australia suffer the most because its Health
Authorities treat Swine Flu as milder than Common Flu.

"A World Health Organization report shows Japan's mortality rate is 2
deaths for every 100,000 people. The rate is higher by 11 times in the
U.K., 16 times in the U.S. and 43 times in Australia

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601124&sid=auxGTNXRwuAI

Japan Mask Wearing, Tamiflu Rush Beat Back Swine Flu Threat
Share Business ExchangeTwitterFacebook| Email | Print | A A A
By Kanoko Matsuyama and Jason Gale


Dec. 11 (Bloomberg) -- Eight hours after Tokyo office worker Shungo
Yamamoto started feeling feverish and faint, he got a diagnosis of
swine flu, received antiviral drugs and embarked on three days of self-
imposed isolation last month.

"I knew it was influenza immediately" because of the fever and joint
pain, Yamamoto, 25, said. His doctor confirmed the diagnosis with a
nose swab test and prescribed five days of Roche Holding AG's
antiviral drug Tamiflu. When he left the doctor's office, Yamamoto put
on a mask, bought a three-day supply of food, rented DVDs and headed
home, where he stayed for the duration of his illness.

Japan's aggressiveness against H1N1 influenza, the result of hygiene
standards, social etiquette and a willingness to test and medicate
immediately, means the country has fared better than the U.S. or the
U.K. in battling the first pandemic in 41 years. A World Health
Organization report shows Japan's mortality rate is 2 deaths for every
100,000 people. The rate is higher by 11 times in the U.K., 16 times
in the U.S. and 43 times in Australia.

"No doctor in Japan would tell a flu patient just to go home and sleep
it off," said Norio Sugaya, a pediatric specialist at Keiyu Hospital
in Yokohama, a port city south of Tokyo. Sugaya sits on a committee
that advises WHO, a Geneva- based arm of the United Nations, on
managing swine flu patients.

In the U.K., a study this month found patients typically waited three
days to start taking Tamiflu, one of two medicines available to fight
the new virus as well as seasonal influenza.

Complication Risk

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, based in Atlanta,
recommends that antiflu drugs be given to hospitalized patients,
pregnant women and others with increased risk of complications. In
Japan, doctors are advised to administer the medicines to anyone
suspected of having flu, even if a rapid diagnostic test is negative,
according to the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, a Tokyo-
based organization of specialist doctors that provides treatment
recommendations.

Japan accounted for three-quarters of the Tamiflu dispensed globally
in the drug's first five years of sale, Roche, based in Basel,
Switzerland, said in a November 2005 filing to the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration.

Three years later, Japan's government announced plans to stockpile
enough antiflu medicines for 45 percent of its 128 million people.
That may be triple the amount required to treat every swine flu
patient. The proportion of people sickened by the pandemic virus
ranges from 7 percent to 15 percent, depending on the country,
according to WHO.

Japanese Practices

Japan's status as one of the biggest users of antiviral medicines and
its approach to treating seasonal and pandemic flu should be compared
with practices elsewhere and the data should be published in English,
said Lance Jennings, a clinical virologist with Canterbury Health
Laboratories in Christchurch, New Zealand, who has studied flu for
more than 30 years.

"If you have better capacity to diagnose cases earlier and are
treating appropriately and early, you're more likely to reduce the
number of patients who will go on to develop more- severe influenza,"
Jennings said in an interview.

While the majority of pandemic flu sufferers got over their illness
within days without treatment, 1 percent to 10 percent needed
hospitalization and as many as a quarter of those patients required
intensive care, WHO said on Dec. 4.

Early Treatment

Tamiflu and Relenza, an inhaled medicine made by London- based
GlaxoSmithKline Plc, appear beneficial in fighting the H1N1 virus,
especially if treatment begins within 48 hours of the onset of
symptoms, researchers said in a study in the New England Journal of
Medicine in November. A paper in the same journal in December reported
reduced complications, including deaths, among hospitalized patients
treated with the medications.

A survey of Japanese patients in 2005 found 85 percent sought medical
treatment for flu and 90 percent of consultations took place within 48
hours after the first symptoms appeared, according to David Reddy, who
heads Roche's influenza task force in Basel.

"These people do not wait until it's too late," Reddy said in a
telephone interview. "Japan has to be the gold standard of management
of influenza. It's almost a societal response in terms of the way
people modify their behavior."

Japanese have become accustomed during the past decade to wearing
masks in public to ward off allergic reactions to pollen from cedar
trees throughout the country, said Masataka Yoshikawa, a researcher
who tracks consumer behavior at Hakuhodo Institute of Life and Living,
the research arm of a Tokyo-based advertising company. Japanese expect
someone with a cold or flu to wear a mask to limit the spread of the
virus, he said.

Wash and Gargle

"Hand-washing, gargling and wearing masks are three hygiene measures
that are very well accepted in the community in Japan," said Nikki
Shindo, the Japanese doctor who is leading WHO's investigation of
swine flu patients. "People don't really hesitate to wear masks in
public places. Even the 24/7 convenience stores sell high-particulate
respirators at a reasonable price."

Some researchers say they are skeptical that Tamiflu is effective and
concerned that the virus will develop resistance to the drug because
of misuse. An analysis of 20 studies published in the British Medical
Journal on Dec. 8 showed Tamiflu offered mild benefits for healthy
adults and found no proof it prevented lower respiratory tract
infections or complications of flu. There is little evidence to show
that otherwise healthy people should be given Tamiflu routinely, the
researchers said.

'No Doubt'

"Based on our analysis and other subsequent work, there is no doubt
that the drug can reduce complications," said Frederick Hayden, a
professor of clinical virology at the University of Virginia School of
Medicine in Charlottesville, who was one of the first doctors to study
Tamiflu in patients.

Missing doses or failing to complete a course of medicine increases
the risk that a drug-evading strain will emerge, said William Aldis,
an assistant professor of global health at Thammasat University in
Bangkok and a former WHO representative to Thailand. In societies such
as Japan, where treatment compliance is high, patients are less likely
to contribute to drug resistance, he said.

"So this is one more reason to think carefully before applying Japan's
approach elsewhere," Aldis said.

Japan, whose flu season typically peaks between January and March, may
face more deaths from H1N1 if the infection trend follows that of
seasonal flu, said Hitoshi Oshitani, a virology professor at Tohoku
University in Sendai, in northern Japan.

"Japan will enter its regular peak flu season from now, and we have to
observe whether the pattern continues or not," he said. Oshitani, who
advises WHO on pandemic strategies for developing nations, also
credits the country's school-closure program for helping battle swine
flu.

To contact the reporters on this story: Kanoko Matsuyama in Tokyo at
kmatsuyama2@bloomberg.net; Jason Gale at j.gale@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: December 10, 2009 10:05 EST

Tuesday 29 December 2009

Who intimidate who? Police or the citizens?

Intimidation must be accompanied with the ability to commit violence.
How can the citizens commit violence against the police?

Unless police is intimidated when its actions are questioned by the
citizens, especially elected representatives.
Actions such as violence against witnesses and suspects resulting in
deaths, which are widely reported and yet no successful prosecution.

But demanding actions demanded by the law of justice, is not
intimidating, it is called fighting for justice. It is those who stop
the fighters of justice who are doing the intimidating.

Actions speak louder than words.
How many citizens died under police custody? Many. Just because the
police had never been found guilty is not surprising when those doing
the investigations are the police themselves.

How many policemen died as a result of direct actions of opposition
elected representatives. None.

You can also apply this to the Israeli Jews versus Palestinian Arabs.
Who do you think intimidate who?

You have to be consistent with your judgement if you really believe in
justice.


It's police intimidation, says Liew

GEORGE TOWN (Dec 28, 2009) : The Selangor police's decision to
investigate Selangor state exco Ean Yong Hian Wah after he had asked
them to cease their probe on Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng for
making allegedly seditious comments is a form of intimidation, says
Bukit Bendera MP Liew Chin Tong.


Ean Yong Hian Wah

Liew Chin Tong
Liew, in a statement, said: "Since when have the police gained such
clout that its actions are beyond public scrutiny and criticism?

"It is the most regrettable that the police has decided on such a
harsh and draconian course to quell views expressed in public sphere."

By doing so, the police is clearly "intimidating" its critics, he
said.

On Sunday, Selangor police chief Datuk Khalid Abu Bakar said Ean
Yong's statement directing the police to cease their investigation of
Lim seemed like an attempt to intimidate the police and as such, the
Seri Kembangan state assemblyman would be hauled up for questioning.

Khalid had earlier said Lim would be questioned this week for
allegedly making seditious comments after the DAP secretary-general
told a Pakatan Rakyat convention on Dec 19 that Teoh Beng Hock had
been "murdered".

Teoh, 30, the political secretary to Ean Yong, was found dead on July
16 at the fifth floor corridor of Plaza Masalam in Shah Alam, which
also houses the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) office. He
was a witness into an MACC probe on alleged abuse of state funds.

An inquest into his death is currently ongoing.

Updated: 06:26PM Mon, 28 Dec 2009

Risk of death ten times higher in children with H1N1

This is the most accurate description of the Swine Flu danger but be
careful with the data.
Is it with Tamilflu or not? Most probably some.
Is it with artificial lung treatment or not? Most probably not all.
If children were treated early with Tamilflu and given access to
artificial respirators and lung machines, fatality rate can be zero.

This is shown by developed nations such as Germany.


http://sitemason.vanderbilt.edu/news/campusnews/2009/12/28/risk-of-death-ten-times-higher-in-children-with-h1n1.102992

Risk of death ten times higher in children with H1N1
RSS feed Print email to a friend
12/28/2009
2:26 pm

A Vanderbilt researcher, while working in his native country of
Argentina, has found that children with H1N1 influenza die at a rate
10 times higher than those who suffer from seasonal flu.

Dr. Fernando Polack, the Cesar Milstein associate professor of
Pediatrics in the Department of Pediatrics at Vanderbilt, describes
the serious impact of the H1N1 influenza virus on children in an
article titled Pediatric Hospitalizations Associated with H1N1
Influenza in Argentina, published in the Dec. 23, 2009, issue of the
New England Journal of Medicine. The overall death rate with H1N1 was
1.1 per 100,000 children, compared to .1 per 100,000 for seasonal flu
in 2007.

Polack also details which children were at highest risk. Due to
Argentina's location in the southern hemisphere, Polack was able to
collect detailed surveillance data during the peak of the H1N1 virus
outbreak in Buenos Aires in June. His cohort included six hospitals
that combine to serve 1.2 million children.

"One thing that was striking was the tremendous impact on hospital
logistics. Routine surgeries were cancelled; mass infection control
practices were put in place; wards doubled-- particularly in ICU's,
with everyone working over capacity. It was pretty rough," Polack
said.

Dr. Kathryn Edwards, Sarah H. Sell Chair in Pediatrics and director of
the Vanderbilt Vaccine Research Program, is a coauthor on the article.
Edwards says the H1N1 outbreak showcases opportunities which can
result from observing opposing seasonal illness peaks from the
northern to the southern hemispheres. The hope is that scientists can
learn to respond more quickly to a developing pandemic.

"Flu is a global disease and we need to work together to understand
and deal with each flu virus," Edwards said.

The first author of the article is Argentinean pediatrician Dr. Romina
Libster, who is currently in Nashville working as a research
specialist with the VVRP. Libster said Polack realized what was
happening when reports began to arise in Mexico that a new flu virus
was causing serious illness.

Contact: Laurie Holloway (615) 322-474
laurie.holloway@vanderbilt.edu

Sunday 27 December 2009

Everyone should get innocuated with swine flu vaccine

In CAnada, 60% still had not been vaccinated. Let us see how they
survive.
My gut instinct is that we all must get it in order to prolong our
lives.

I certainly will invest money into the well being of my family. those
of us of can afford it should also be vaccinated so that it will slow
down the spread of this dangerous flu.

http://thestar.com.my/health/story.asp?file=/2009/12/27/health/5362081&sec=health

Sunday December 27, 2009
A(H1N1) vaccine by March/April 2010
By LEE TSE LING

Here's that update on flu vaccines in Malaysia you've been waiting
for.

HOW long more do we have to wait for a publicly-available A(H1N1)
influenza vaccine? Anytime from March to April, says Sanofi-Aventis
medical manager (Malaysia/Singapore/Brunei) Dr Shree Jacob.
Unlike the pandemic A(H1N1) vaccine due to arrive in January, the new
seasonal flu vaccine due to arrive in March/April will be available to
the general public, as long as they can pay for it. – AP/ Amy Sancetta

If this is news to you, it's probably, and understandably, because you
were caught up in Christmas festivities and didn't manage to catch our
news report about it on Friday.

Seasonal, not pandemic

The formulation due to arrive in March/April is the routinely produced
southern hemisphere trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine, which
arrives every year around the same time.

This year, it will contain a component that is protectective against
the A(H1N1) strain currently circulating. The new formulation is
different from the expedited pandemic A(H1N1) monovalent vaccine that
is due to arrive in January.

"Monovalent" here means the pandemic flu vaccine contains just one
viral strain ie the A(H1N1) strain everybody has been so worried
about. "Trivalent" means the seasonal flu vaccine contains three viral
strains.

One of the three strains is the A/California/7/2009-like strain, which
the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommended for inclusion in the
seasonal vaccine back in Sept.

This strain closely resembles the A(H1N1) strain currently circulating
and will protect recipients against it, confirms technical officer
with the WHO Representative Office for Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia,
and Singapore, Dr Harpal Singh.

Available, at a price

Unlike the pandemic A(H1N1) vaccine due to arrive in Jan, which will
only be available from public hospitals and clinics to frontliners and
high-risk groups, the new seasonal vaccine will be available as usual
to the general public (as long as they can pay for it) through private
hospitals and clinics that stock it.

Normally, the seasonal flu vaccine costs below RM100. (Between RM40
and RM60, consultant cardiologist Datuk Dr Khoo Kah Lin told us a
while back.)

Their arrival is good news, says recently appointed Health Ministry
disease control director Dr Lokman Hakim Sulaiman.

"We very much welcome these new seasonal vaccines, which should also
protect against A(H1N1). The public will now have access to the
vaccine," he told Fit4Life.

In other news

Malaysia will not be one of the 95 nations receiving pandemic A(H1N1)
WHO vaccine from its stockpile of donations sourced from various
governments, foundations, and manufacturers.

Not surprising, as Malaysia did not request vaccine aid. (Nations that
did were then selected based on their vulnerability to the pandemic
and their readiness and ability to use the vaccine for priority
populations.)

If we had requested aid, we would not have qualified, says Dr Harpal.
After all, "Malaysia has already procured their own vaccines, compared
to countries like Somalia and Sierra Leone, which can't even afford to
initiate discussions," he explains.

Who should/shouldn't get it?

High-risk groups for complications should, advises Dr Lokman.

Generally, these groups include the elderly, the pregnant, those with
chronic conditions or suppressed immune systems, and those in nursing
homes or long-term care facilities.

However, the ministry's policy on vaccination for high-risk groups,
like any other vaccination, still very much depends on the indication
of use from the vaccine manufacturer, which they are awaiting.

Generally, people who should not get the vaccine include those
allergic to eggs or previous flu vaccines. For other
contraindications, consult your doctor.

What about other instances that aren't so clear-cut? Healthy
travellers, for example. Or those who aren't at risk, but can afford
to purchase it.

On one hand, widespread vaccination prevents the target virus from
hanging around in a community for long.

That doesn't just reduce infections. It prevents the virus from
meeting, mingling, and mutating with other flu viruses in human
bodies.

On the other hand, we can't deny vaccines can cause adverse effects,
however rare or small.

So what should you do? Decide. With your doctor, weigh the risk
factors you and your loved ones face. Consider which is higher - the
risk associated with getting vaccinated (eg adverse effects) or the
risk associated with not getting vaccinated (eg flu complications)?

If you're young, fit, and in robust health, the balance obviously tips
in favour of not needing vaccination. But if you have, say, chronic
heart disease, then the balance tips the other way.

Ultimately, what we should all keep in mind is that vaccination is not
the end-all when it comes to flu mitigation. Public health measures
like practising good hygiene, cough/sneeze etiquette, and social
distancing when ill, Dr Lokman stresses, remain a cornerstone of
prevention for all.

Friday 25 December 2009

Re: Brain Drain from Malaysia

On Dec 24, 12:10 pm, Tanki <5191...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Brain Drain Plan
> Posted by: Yogeswaran Gopala Krishnan
> We have talked and debated about the brain drain situation in
> Malaysia. It is happening in front of our very own eyes and more often
> then not, we are left wondering why not enough is done to plug this
> hole
>
> Now, if we carefully think about it, maybe the country can benefit
> from brain drains.
>
> We have a growing number of unemployed graduates who can't speak
> English.  If the clever ones who are able to articulate in English can
> leave the country, we would have enough jobs for these low performers.
>
> Malaysia is not a design hub but more of a Manufacturing/Agricultural
> country. Let's face it, we don't have to be rocket scientists to
> control operators and make sure factory operations runs. It does not

Actually we still have these brilliant scientists, and many of them
are chinese in Malaysia, but their views are not taken seriously
because the leaders and those in power don't understand anything at
all.

As usual, just because they don't understand new ideas, it means that
these ideas are all wrong.

Low salaries is not the main reason why a nation is so backward. Look
at China and Russia. Their salaries are low but most citizens are
still loyal to their nations and will not take up offers of better pay
overseas.

In Malaysia there is a general belief that leaders and decision makers
need not know what they do. This is clearly shown by the Malaysian
federal government policy that anyone can be leaders in agencies
despite them not qualified to work in these fields. For example,
geologists head account departments, and vice versa.

So clearly brain drain is not the reason but idiocy is.

Why Malaysians tolerate idiocy and blame it on brain-drain?

Because Malaysians don't really care. They only care for getting
better paid jobs instead of improving the lives of Malaysians in
general.

The reason is actually very simple. Malaysians think that they are
alright but statistics don't lie.
The income gap is the same as sahara nations, i.e. the worst in the
world.
The human trafficking and slavery is among the worst in Malaysia.
Water and electricity supply is also among the worst in the world
judging from the electric lines shown in the towns in Darfur, Sudan
well known to be the worst in the world.

Malaysians are proud of their development. It certainly looks better
than Mecca of Saudi Arabia, but Bangladeshis are laughing at the state
of development in Kota Kinabalu.

Imagine nobody complain when Johor has no water at all in their water
reserve tanks and yet nobody complained while Singapore cried and
wailed when their water reserve tanks are still half-full.

Despite all these miserable statistics of Malaysia, and the obvious
excesses of the police and enforcement agencies reinforced by
illogical court judgements that don't seem to understand simple
English phrases, the same government is returned to power with
overwhelming majority.

The bottom line is that, Malaysians have never really suffered
compared to Russia and China.
The only cure is for Malaysia to fall into chaos and disasters before
Malaysians react logically to preserve their livelihood. It is going
to be painful and will take decades of pain, just like what History
had told us.

Look at Zimbabwe.


> even have to run efficiently as Malaysia does have a certain low
> production cost advantage to all these multinational companies, who
> will likely to continue to invest.
>
> Yes, going backwards is the way forward……it will benefit the country
> and politicians.
>
> Low performers do not need to be highly paid. Where are they going to
> go? They are not competitive and cannot survive anywhere else except
> in Malaysia. They are not smart, English illiterates, contented
> without any ambition and hence easily controlled and manipulated.
>
> With all the highly paid intelligent people gone (they are now
> Singapore's problem), the country can is able to function at a lower
> cost.
>
> Sure, income from the taxes will be reduced but we have PETRONAS, to
> take care of the Politician's….ahem….the People's needs as there will
> be more oil money to go around – remember, there will less intelligent
> people to question how the money is being spent.
>
> The unintelligent people will not argue and will grab whatever crumbs
> (i.e. Development Projects) that are thrown at them.
>
> The Plan is Fail Proof!

Thursday 17 December 2009

Is Swine Flu really mild?

Despite the not coming of my prediction of severe deaths in November,
the 2nd wave actually hit.

The number of deaths had been minimised but still very tragic, but why
the 2nd wave? People dropped their guard allowing the 2nd wave. Once
they realise how bad it was, people and doctors start taking
precautions.

The good news is that in Malaysia, from the worst death incidences,
due mostly to non-usage of Tamilflu, despite their availability, it is
now zero. Doctors in Malaysia are now well trained. For instance, my 2-
year old nephew got mild flu, but chest sound and later X-ray
confirmed the start of a pneumonia at a specialist hospital. He was
quickly prescribed Tamilflu and antibiotics. He was quickly cured.
Just imagine what will happen if he were treated mildly as had
happened in the early days in Malaysia. Despite having high fever and
chest pains, doctors still do not consider it as swine flu. Let alone
have an X-ray. My nephew didn't see a specialist first, he was seen by
a general practitioner at SMC but probably they are more experienced
and caring than new government doctors.

The 2nd wave was stopped because vaccinations were started and people
in US start taking precautions. Prior to the 2nd wave in November, 20%
doctors didn't prescribe Tamilflu immediately, and yet it had strained
the US health care.

By December only 1 in 7 US citizens got the Swine flu and yet, some
healthcare already strained. Vaccination is ongoing but slow moving.
The usual peak flu season is January to March when school resumes.
December is vacation time.

Let us hope that more citizens opt for the vaccination because even if
only 2 out of 7 remained unvaccinated, it will likely overburden their
health care.

Why should Malaysia care? We never have any peak flu season but many
of us visit US and they may return to Malaysia bringing this flu
pandemic.


http://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2009/12/mild_pandemic_bite_your_tongue.php
Mild pandemic? Bite your tongue.

Category: Pandemic preparedness • Swine flu
Posted on: December 16, 2009 6:44 AM, by revere

A spot-on column in CIDRAP Business Source [subscription] by Center
for Infectious Disease Research and Policy's (CIDRAP) Director, Mike
Osterholm, reminded me to say something I've wanted to say for a long
time. We should banish the word "mild" from the influenza lexicon.
There's no such thing as a mild case of influenza, any more than there
are "mild" auto accidents. There are cases that for reasons we don't
understand don't make you very sick (or sick at all), and there are
cases that can lay you lower than you ever want to be, including six
feet under. What Osterholm does with great cogency is put paid to the
idea this is a mild pandemic. His reasons will be familiar to readers
here, but he says them extremely well.

Both Osterholm and we find CDC's most recent estimates (November 14)
of about 10,000 deaths, 47 million infections and over 200,000
hospitalizations "credible and thoughtful." To compare the oft quoted
number of 36,000 excess deaths from seasonal flu to this 10,000 number
is an "apples and oranges" affair. The 36,000 number is an excess
mortality figure derived by different and non-comparable methods (see
our post here for more details). Here is some of Osterholm's version:

In that CDC study, only 9,000 of those estimated annual seasonal
deaths are due directly to influenza or secondary bacterial pneumonia.
The other deaths are among persons who have influenza and who die of
events like heart attacks or strokes. If you want a comparison, think
of the guy who has a heart attack while snow blowing his driveway
after a large snowstorm and whose death is labeled "storm-related."

More important, though, is what we pointed out early on. It's not just
the number of deaths but the pattern of illness in the population,
flu's descriptive epidemiology:

More than 90% of the estimated seasonal influenza deaths occur in
the elderly, who in many instances have existing serious health
conditions that mean their deaths may not be far off, regardless of
their influenza illness. We all realize that death is inevitable, and,
as a public health practitioner, I find that this mad race to
eliminate the top 10 causes of death is not always well thought
through. If we were to accomplish such a goal, there would be 10 new
leading causes of death, and I'm not so sure some of those would be
better than the current ones. But I think we can all agree that "early
deaths"—or those that occur well before our elderly years —just
shouldn't happen. The way we count influenza mortality, an influenza-
related death in an 87-year-old person with advanced Alzheimer disease
is the same as the death of a 22-year-old otherwise perfectly healthy
pregnant woman. Both deaths are equally tragic, but any reasonable
person would agree they are not equivalent public health outcomes.

[snip]

Of the estimated 9,820 deaths:

* 1,090 (11%) have occurred in children 0-17 years of age
* 7,450 (76%) in people 18-64 years of age
* 1,280 (13%) in people over 65 years of age

This age distribution differs considerably from what we see with
seasonal influenza. (Dr. Michael Osterholm, Featured article CIDRAP
BUsiness Source; subscription required)

Which brings me back to the issue of "mild" flu and mild pandemics.
While this pandemic is not 1918 (for which we can be grateful,
although no one knows what prevents this or any other pandemic from
repeating that catastrophe), it is still pretty bad, already producing
more estimated hospitalizations than seasonal flu and we aren't even
into the heart of flu season yet:

It's challenging our healthcare system unlike any previous
seasonal influenza season over the past 30 years. That makes it hard
for me to call this a "mild" pandemic. I just don't believe the term
works.

Yes, there are mild, moderate, or severe influenza illnesses on an
individual basis. But how do we describe a pandemic that hits a
limited group of people really hard and causes only "routine
influenza" for most others?

Whatever you describe it, I'm with Osterholm. Don't call anything
connected with flu, mild. Most flu infections don't have dire
consequences, but a significant number do. And we never know who is
going to win the lottery. The convergence in our views extends to the
same analogy: automobile accidents. As we've noted several times, it
doesn't make much sense to call any encounter with several tons of
moving steel "mild." It may be an encounter that produces little or no
damage, but that's luck. Anyone who's gotten the repair bill for what
can happen when hit by another car going only 5 miles per hour won't
consider the encounter "mild." More importantly, any such encounter
has the potential to be a catastrophe and the really bad ones are
often just plain dumb luck. Mostly we don't have such terrible luck.
Yet even a fender bender can be expensive or result in minor injuries
and be emotionally traumatic as well as result in lost work. Whatever
you might be tempted to call an auto accident (minor or a scratch or a
fender bender), very few people would be prone to call it "mild." And
whle the number of people killed each year in motor vehicle accidents
is roughly the same as seasonal flu, we don't usually think of our
nation's annual highway death toll of 40,000 as "mild" either. Its age
distribution isn't too different than pandemic flu's either, the
source of much anxiety to any parent whose child has just gotten their
driver's license.

It's not just that "mild" is an inapt word. It is an inapt and
dangerous idea. It is based on comparing total deaths in flu seasons
with each another, not with the public health toll they exact. It is
worse than a word not conveying the proper seriousness. It sends a
message that itself has consequences, promoting a lack of urgency
about taking rational public health measures like vaccination.

That's especially pertinent this year when we don't yet know what the
usual flu season (January to March) will bring, either with seasonal
flu or a recrudescence ("wave 3") of swine flu. As Osterholm points
out, even with available vaccine now certain in the next few months,
we are likely to find ourselves in January with a very large
proportion of the population still without immune protection.

After all, what's the hurry? It's a mild pandemic.

Sunday 22 November 2009

Children death data confirms Swine Flu is much worse

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/22/panic-flu-deaths-ukraine-politicians

40 - 150 children die annually from normal flu.

CDC had admitted that it had VASTLY underestimated the swine flu
deaths.

In just 6.5 months 300 - 800 children died with 13 - 14 million
infected with swine flu. Which means that it will get much worse.
Given a population of 300 million, i.e. about 30 times, the death
could reach 9000 - 24000 children, alone.

It makes swine flu 200 times worse than all common flu variants
combined altogether.

It makes it vital for Tamilflu to be used quickly as currently
recommended by WHO and CDC.

Despite so much evidence from Mexico and Canada, WHO and CDC didn't
make such clear recommendations making them responsible for all the
unnecessary deaths due to late or even non-administration of Tamilflu,
which is still effective at the moment.

Cases of Tamilflu resistance is increasing and is as predicted by any
intelligent person. Even manufacturers predict it will happen as in
the case of all antiviral and antibiotics.


Published Sunday November 22, 2009
Scientists struggle to explain some cases

THE WASHINGTON POST
« Flu Watch

* RSS
* SHARE
o DiggDigg
o NewsvineNewsvine
o del.icio.usdel.icio.us
o RedditReddit
o FacebookFacebook
o TwitterTwitter
* PRINT
* EMAIL

JETERSVILLE, Va. — On Wednesday, Oct. 7, 6-year-old Heaven Skyler
Wilson dragged herself off the school bus that dropped her in front of
her home on a rural road in Jetersville, just south of Richmond. The
little girl, who had never had so much as an ear infection in her
life, was pale and feverish and complained of an upset stomach.

The next day, Heaven's grandmother, Pat Sparrow, took her to a nearby
clinic. Heaven, usually a bright, bubbly girl with blond pigtails,
dimples and effusive energy, had a sore throat and a 103-degree
temperature. The doctor swabbed her for the flu, and the test was
positive.

It was just something going around, Sparrow said she was told. The
doctor told Sparrow to take Heaven home, give her Tylenol and chicken
broth, and let her rest.

By the next morning, Heaven couldn't breathe. Sparrow called 911.
Advertising

"How does she sound?" Sparrow said the dispatcher calmly asked.

Sparrow's panicked husband held the phone to the child's heaving
lungs. "This is how she's breathing! Will you get here now?"

He scooped the child in his arms and rushed across the lawn to meet
the ambulance. By the time they arrived at Chippenham Hospital in
Richmond about 30 minutes later, Heaven's face was blue. Emergency
room doctors intubated her and put her on a respirator.

Two weeks later, on Oct. 21, ravaged with double pneumonia and a staph
infection that deprived her brain of oxygen, Heaven was disconnected
from the respirator. She lived for four minutes.

At 11:18 p.m., Heaven died in the arms of her mother, Sara Wilson.
"You never heard such an awful scream from someone who loved her child
so much," Sparrow said, her voice shaking.

This year's swine flu is, by official standards, a "mild to moderate"
pandemic. As in every year, with every seasonal flu, people get sick.
Some are hospitalized. And some die. But it is the seemingly random
deaths of healthy, young people such as Heaven that are driving much
of the fear around swine flu.

With seasonal flu, 90 percent of the people who die are older than 65;
most of those victims are older than 85. The worst outbreaks of
seasonal flu are usually reported in nursing homes. But with this
year's H1N1 strain, the demographics are reversed. Now, most of those
dying are younger than 65, the worst outbreaks are in schools and the
highest hospitalization rate is among children younger than 4.

Forty to 150 children die from the seasonal flu every year. The
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently said that it had
vastly underestimated the number of children who have died from swine
flu. The number of pediatric deaths had previously been reported to be
129. Now, the government estimates that 300 to 800 children died
between April 1 and Oct. 17. During that period, 14 million to 34
million Americans came down with swine flu, the CDC said.

Nationwide, about one-third of the children who have died were, like
Heaven, otherwise healthy, CDC officials and other reports said.

Heaven was the first and only confirmed H1N1 victim in Virginia to die
despite having no underlying complications or health condition. Of the
27 Virginia swine flu victims who have died since April, three have
been children.

The mystery over a relative handful of cases is fueling anxiety about
the scarcity of vaccine, jamming switchboards at pediatricians'
offices and sending concerned parents to overflowing health clinics.
(That eagerness to get the vaccine is, however, a minority phenomenon:
In a Washington Post-ABC News poll last month, more than six in 10 of
those surveyed said they will not get vaccinated, and only 52 percent
of parents planned to have their children vaccinated.)

Scientists are at a loss to explain why perfectly healthy young people
might die from the flu.

"Why would younger individuals, otherwise healthy, succumb to this
virus?" asked Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases. "That, in the experience we have
generally with other viruses, rarely, rarely happens. We don't know
the answer to that. But that is the thing that scares parents,
understandably."

In any flu, death most often comes because the virus has so weakened
the lungs and body that infection sets in.

Beth Bell, an associate director of the CDC's National Center for
Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said many of the children who
have died had no underlying medical condition but succumbed to a
secondary bacterial infection.

"That's one of the reasons why we say that if a child appears to be
getting better, then gets worse again, that's a danger sign," Bell
said. A child might be recovering from the viral infection when common
bacteria that naturally colonize in the nose, mouth or throat begin to
reproduce wildly and take hold of the weakened body. "We don't know
why that might be," Bell said. "But it's not a time to wait."

CDC confirms importance of early Tamilflu

http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-me-flu-guidelines21-2009nov21,0,2717012.story?track=rss

Many doctors in US had been warned by CDC not to delay administering
Tamilflu, because it is found that 25% of those with confirmed Swine
Flu were not administered with Tamilflu.

The author also recommends Tamilflu even after 48 hours because there
were cases that Tamilflu was effective.

When to take a sick child to the ER
Children and youths are especially hard-hit by swine flu. It is
important to watch for danger signs, as the onset of respiratory
failure can be swift.
By Rong-Gong Lin II

November 21, 2009


For parents worried about a child sick with the flu, deciding when to
head to the emergency room can be difficult.

Unlike the typical seasonal flu, which is generally most dangerous to
infants and the elderly, the H1N1 strain has hit children, teenagers
and young adults unusually hard and with little warning.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated earlier
this month that more children have died from the H1N1 flu than people
over 65, about 540 children as of mid-October compared to 440 seniors.
And the agency recently reported that flu-related pediatric deaths
were continuing to rise. An estimated 2,900 adults between 18 and 64
have died. Most years, 90% of people who die of the flu are 65 or
older, officials said.

Life-threatening cases, however, remain unusual. As concern grows
about the danger of H1N1, doctors also are seeing an uptick in what
they call the "worried well," parents who seek emergency care for
perfectly healthy children.

So when should you take your child to the emergency room? Doctors say
parents and guardians should assess how sick a child is in part based
on experience.

"Is there something really different about your child that's different
from the seven or eight viral infections your kid gets every year?
Those are the changes to look out for," said Dr. Mark Morocco,
associate residency director for emergency medicine at UCLA.

Warning signs include significant difficulty breathing; inability to
drink fluids or urinate for more than six hours; change in the color
of the mouth or lips; or unusual behavioral changes, such as a crying
child who cannot be consoled, or a child who doesn't wake up or walk
or talk normally.

If any of those symptoms show up in children, parents should take them
to the emergency room, Morocco said, noting that "respiratory
infections are often things that are the most life-threatening in
children."

Lung inflammation is particularly dangerous to infants and young
children because their airways are smaller. According to the
California Department of Public Health, the flu virus replicates in
the airways and lungs, causing them to swell. The inflammation makes
it difficult for the lungs to work, reducing the body's ability to
take oxygen into the bloodstream.

In California, the most common causes of deaths associated with H1N1
flu have been viral pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome,
state health officials wrote in a recent report in the Journal of the
American Medical Assn. Experts are telling clinicians to treat the
H1N1 strain differently than the seasonal flu.

In a Journal of the American Medical Assn. editorial published earlier
this month, former CDC director Julie Louise Gerberding wrote that
patients who have a five- or six-day history of flu-like illness and
whose ability to breathe is worsening "appear to be at risk for rapid
deterioration" and should be treated with antiviral drugs and admitted
to the hospital.

"Clinicians should not be falsely reassured by previous good health,
young age and absence of major comorbidities because these
characteristics do not exclude the potential for respiratory failure
and death," Gerberding wrote.

The CDC has also warned that some physicians are not prescribing
antiviral drugs to H1N1 patients, pointing to studies that show that
about 25% of hospitalized patients with lab-confirmed H1N1 did not
receive Tamiflu or similar drugs.

Even among those who did get antiviral drugs, medication was often
delayed for one or two days after they were admitted to a hospital,
the CDC said. California health officials have also said that
antiviral medication can reduce mortality even when given late, which
is defined as more than 48 hours after symptoms begin.

Although most people who are hospitalized or have died from H1N1 have
underlying medical conditions, a significant proportion of H1N1
victims are otherwise healthy.

"What's surprising about this flu is . . . we're seeing patients
between the ages of 10 and 47 with no underlying medical problems that
are getting into trouble. And that's scary for us, because it's hard
to know who is going to get in trouble," said Dr. Gail Carruthers,
director of the pediatric emergency department at Long Beach Memorial
Medical Center and Miller Children's Hospital.

Sometimes, patients will report flu-like symptoms for as little as
three hours or as long as two weeks, then quickly become significantly
worse. Their lungs begin to fail and fill up with fluid, requiring
intensive care.

Carruthers recalled two recent patients, a teenager and a middle-aged
person, whose lungs began failing even though they had no underlying
medical conditions.

"It's almost like watching them drown," Carruthers said. "They feel
like they can't get any air." But, Carruthers added, "if you don't
feel short of breath, and you have a dry cough, you're probably fine
staying at home."

ron.lin@latimes.com

Saturday 14 November 2009

Better late than never: WHO correction

Earlier one group of WHO experts only recommend Tamilflu after 3 days
by which time the effectiveness of Tamilflu is proven to be almost
zero based on manufacturers' tests.

It has caused more deaths than those who don't get any Tamilflu at
all, and most probably responsible for the increase in the number of
Tamilflu resistant swine flu.

Soon all the expensive Tamilflu stocks will be useless as a result of
that stupid WHO recommendation when the number of Tamilflu resistant
cases overwhelm the normal swine flu.

You may argue that WHO never recommend the administration of Tamilflu
after 48 hours but giving a directive that ONLY THOSE WITH PROVEN
SERIOUS CASES BE GIVEN TAMILFLU is the same as saying that, because
serious cases can only be proven more than 48 hours of flu symptoms.

With the introduction of vaccination, it is now time to finish all the
Tamilflu stocks in order to save as many lives as possible.

Despite all the meaningless deaths caused by the earlier WHO
recommendation, stupidly implemented by thoughtless doctors, this new
recommendation should be welcomed.

It does not mean the most doctors are thoughtless. In fact most of
them have ignored this earlier directive as shown by various medical
advises given by successful doctors who managed to save lives.

http://www.rferl.org/content/Amplifier_WHO_Urges_Doctors_To_Use_Antiviral_Drugs_Sooner_To_Prevent_Swine_Flu_Deaths/1877353.html

WHO Urges Doctors To Use Antiviral Drugs Sooner To Prevent Swine Flu
Deaths

The recommendation to administer antivirals such as Tamiflu much
earlier represents a dramatic turnaround.
November 13, 2009
By Charles Recknagel
The World Health Organization (WHO) is urging doctors to administer
antiviral drugs sooner to patients suffering from swine flu.

At the same time, it says it is sending emergency supplies of
antivirals -- such as Tamiflu and Relenza -- to developing countries
hardest hit by the pandemic, including Afghanistan, Azerbaijan,
Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine, and Mongolia.

The WHO recommendation to administer antivirals early is a dramatic
turnaround from the UN agency's earlier guidelines.

Previously, the WHO had urged doctors to use laboratory tests to
confirm that patients have the H1N1 virus before administering
antiviral drugs.

But the organization said on November 12 that as medical workers have
gained experience with swine flu, they have learned that waiting for
lab tests can be a fatal delay.

"People in at-risk groups need to be treated with antivirals as soon
as possible when they have flu symptoms," Dr. Nikki Shindo, a medical
officer with the WHO's global influenza program, told reporters in
Geneva. "This includes pregnant women, children under 2 years old, and
people with underlying conditions such as respiratory problems."

She said that people who are not in high-risk groups can wait a little
longer.

"People who are not from at-risk groups but who have persistent or
rapidly worsening symptoms should also be treated with antivirals,"
she said. "These symptoms include difficulty breathing and a high
fever that last beyond three days."

But Shindo said the vast majority of patients who contract swine flu
will not have symptoms lasting long enough to require antivirals.

"I want to stress that people who are not from the at-risk group and
have only a typical cold need not take antivirals," Shindo said. "We
are not recommending taking antivirals if otherwise healthy people are
experiencing only mild illness, or as a preventive in healthy people."

Rapid Deterioration

The change in the WHO's guidelines comes as doctors in pandemic areas
find that the H1N1 virus can cause a very rapid deterioration of
health in some patients, usually on the fifth or sixth day following
the onset of symptoms.

The deterioration is characterized by primary viral pneumonia, which
destroys the lung tissue and does not respond to antibiotics. Even
when such patients are placed under intensive care in hospitals, it
can be too late to prevent death.

A plane full of antiviral drugs is unloaded in Ukraine earlier this
month.
Shindo said that the UN health agency asked doctors what they could
have done differently to avoid the fatalities, and that all had said
"without exception" that the outcomes would have been different if the
patients had been treated with an antiviral drug earlier.

The hardest-hit countries since the influenza season began in the
Northern Hemisphere are countries with medical systems that even in
normal times have to cope with shortages of funding and medicines.
Those fragile systems now have been overwhelmed with flu patients and
have limited stocks of antivirals to cope with the pandemic.

Shindo said the WHO is rushing additional supplies of antivirals to
six countries.

"Recently, we sent supplies to Afghanistan, Mongolia, Belarus, and
Ukraine," she said, "and we will send antivirals to Azerbaijan and
Kyrgyzstan."

Rapid Distribution

She called on all the countries to rapidly distribute the new supplies
to local areas so that patients who need them do not have to travel to
central hospitals.

"A further recommendation we make is that countries decentralize the
distribution of antivirals and insure that general practitioners have
access to these medicines for their patients. Patients should not need
to visit a hospital in order to get antivirals prescribed," Shindo
said.

Since the H1N1 virus was first identified early this year, it has
swept worldwide and is now the dominant form of flu in circulation.

The WHO says that in areas where there is widespread influenza,
doctors should assume that patients with flulike symptoms are infected
with H1N1.

The flu is unlike normal seasonal influenza in that it appears to
particularly affect younger and healthy people. Worldwide, around 40
percent of severe cases are now occurring in previously healthy
children and adults under the age of 50.

By contrast, normal seasonal influenza usually targets older people,
with 90 percent of deaths occurring in people over 65 years of age.

Saturday 7 November 2009

CDC update confirm severity of H1N1 over common flu

It is the most complete statistics on swine flu that I had ever come
across so far although it is localised to some place in USA that is
suffering with winter.

Before it was estimated that 80% of flu cases were swine flu.

This time, it is not just estimate but actual tests.

http://www.examiner.com/x-18331-Natural-Health-Examiner~y2009m11d6-H1N1-Swine-Flu-statistics-update-by-CDC-1142009

H1N1 Swine Flu statistics update by CDC, 11-4-2009
November 6, 5:05 PMNatural Health ExaminerGenevieve Kiger
Previous
Comment Print Email RSS Subscribe
Subscribe

Get alerts when there is a new article from the Natural Health
Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use
H1N1 Swine Flu Spreading Quickly
The Reach of H1N1 Swine Flu Spreads Daily

On November 4th, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
issued an update on H1N1 swine flu statistics in the US current
through October 24th, week 42.

H1N1 Swine Flu vs. Regular Seasonal Flu

During the week of October 18-24, there were 19,642 specimens tested
for influenza virus. Of those, 8,268 (42.1 percent) tested positive
for some variety of flu virus. 21 specimens were influenza B, with
the remaining 8,247 being influenza A. 5,453 of those cases were
confirmed as H1N1 swine flu; the remainder either were not subtyped,
or the sub typing was unsuccessful. Not one single specimen
successfully subtyped showed either of the normal seasonal flu
subtypes (H1 and H3).

What is the Current Spread of H1N1?

Forty-eight states reported geographically widespread influenza
activity, Guam and two states reported regional influenza activity,
the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico reported local influenza
activity, and the U.S. Virgin Islands did not report.

Region 3 (DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV) and Region 7 (IA, KS, MO, NE)
reported the greatest percentage of cases that tested positive for
flu. Region 3 also had, by far, the greatest number of confirmed
H1N1 swine flu cases.

Other Important H1N1 Swine Flu Statistics in the Update

* There were 22 pediatric deaths associated with an influenza
virus during the week in question, 19 of which were confirmed H1N1
swine flu, and three whose subtype was undetermined. The child deaths
were located in Arizona [3], Florida, Georgia, Guam, Montana, Ohio,
South Dakota, Tennessee [2], Texas [9], Washington, and Wisconsin.
This brings the total flu-related deaths in children since August 30th
to 74, and 114 overall with the H1N1 virus. In contrast, there was
only one influenza-related pediatric death in the same week last year.
* The percentage of deaths associated with P&I (pneumonia and
influenza) was above epidemic levels. For the week in question, the
epidemic level is considered to be 6.6 percent of all deaths; it was
at 7.1 percent.
* All areas reporting had levels of ILI (influenza-like illness)
above the baseline for this time of year. the national baseline for
the week in question is 2.3 percent; but the week's figures were right
at 8 percent.

Thursday 29 October 2009

ONly Healthy kids died from Swine Flu

What other reason apart from the non-administration of Tamilflu as
insisted by Manufacturers.

Those with underlying diseases, were given Tamilfu immediately and all
of them survived.

The healthy ones had to wait for more than 48 hours before Tamilflu is
given, for their severity to be confirmed but it is too late. By this
time it is too late already. It is just a waste of Tamiflu and creates
more problems by increasing the incidence of Tamilflu-resistant virus.

This is all due to WHO directive who does NOT ALLOW the administration
of Tamilflu for the healthy ones, immediately.


http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report_healthy-kids-succumbed-to-swine-flu-death-audit_1304009

Healthy kids succumbed to swine flu: Death audit

Sumitra Deb Roy / DNAWednesday, October 28, 2009 2:55 IST
Email
Print
Share
Mumbai: More healthy children in the state have succumbed to swine
flu, or influenza A (H1N1), than to underlying ailments, including
HIV.

You may also want to see
Experimental drug cocktail may help fight antiviral-resistant swine
flu
Rajasthan sets up committee for swine flu measures in winter
Footballers told to stop spitting on pitch over swine flu fears
Two out of three victims test negative
H1N1 is mutating, turning deadlier
Related videos
Swine flu dampens spirit of Navratri in Pune
Schools reopen in Pune after two weeks
Pune swine flu situation has stabilised: CM
Complete Coverage
The swine flu pandemic
A death audit of H1N1 patients in Pune's Sassoon General Hospital
(which treated the maximum number of swine flu cases in Maharashtra)
has proved wrong the theory that better immunity in children could
shield against swine flu. The trend, however, is the reverse for
adults.

The audit, conducted on October 23, showed that all eight children who
had succumbed to the virus at Sassoon were healthy, not immuno-
compromised, a government official said. "On the other hand, we had
children with HIV/Aids suffering from malaria, dengue and even cardiac
ailments. They were cured after being administered Tamiflu," he said.
Sassoon had checked 317 children for H1N1, with 52 testing positive.

"The state will look into the reasons why so many children tested
negative when the virus was in the air," he said.

"Experts think since healthy children fought the virus with more
virulence, their immune system could have collapsed faster," added the
official.

Dr Arun Jamkar, dean, BJ Medical College, Pune, said: "Of the 44
children discharged after successful treatment, at least 10 were
suffering from underlying ailments, but still fought the swine flu
virus." The findings will be studied further, he said.

Dr Pravin Shingare, joint director, Directorate of Medical Education
and Research, said that the findings have taken health experts by
surprise. "About 80% of adults who succumbed to H1N1 were suffering
from co-morbid conditions like diabetes, hypertension, heart problems
and HIV/Aids."

Maharashtra has been worst hit by swine flu, with about 180 people
losing their lives. In Mumbai, 29 people died, among them 8 children.
The city is yet to undertake a Sassoon-like study.

The state government will share the Sassoon findings with global
agencies through video conference on Wednesday. Among the participants
will be top bureaucrats, health officers from state hospitals, the
Union ministry of health, the Atlanta-based Centres for Disease
Control and Prevention and the World Health Organisation.

Good advice on Vaccination

If you can afford vaccination, you should be vaccinated. Your life is
more valuable than all of your possessions.

http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/misinformation+contagious+potentially+deadly/2152838/story.html

Flu misinformation is contagious - and potentially deadly

Why do people who would never use Google to decide that they knew more
than their lawyer or architect decide that they know better than their
physicians?

BY CATHERINE D'AMICO, FREELANCEOCTOBER 28, 2009


I am a family physician and I am going to get my H1N1 flu shot and so
are my children. I hope that my fellow Canadians will too.

Based on what occurred in the Southern Hemisphere during their winter
this year, it is expected that about 80 per cent or more of the
influenza virus circulating this year will be H1N1 and about 20 per
cent seasonal flu.

There is a lot of misinformation being passed from person to person
about the flu vaccine. And unfortunately many are simply accepting
what they hear as fact.

Why do people who would never use Google, or the opinions of friends
and colleagues, to decide that they knew more than their lawyer,
engineer, or architect, decide that they know better than their
physicians? Or the PhDs in immunology and microbiology and public
health staff who research these issues for months or years, and have
the scientific background to be able to evaluate the research and
safety data?

How could all the scientists, physicians, and governments in every
province and country who are all looking at the data and recommending
vaccination be wrong?

Here are the facts: The seasonal flu vaccine and H1N1 vaccine are
called subunit vaccines which do not introduce live or whole flu virus
into the body. The flu vaccine delivers a minute quantity of a
sterilized, purified portion of the influenza virus into the body. The
immune system is then stimulated to respond and in about two weeks
this results in immunity.

When someone gets the actual flu, they have had whole live influenza
virus enter their body through their nose or mouth. The influenza
virus attaches to the nasopharynx cells, then enters and reproduces
within them. Millions and millions of live viruses are then released,
teeming throughout the person's body and bloodstream. This is an
overwhelming attack and as the battle ensues and the immune system
fights, the temperature rises, the body fatigues, and the symptoms of
influenza result.

Most cases of H1N1 have been mild, but as we have seen, for some, and
sometimes randomly, the battle is severe and death results.

Why would you choose for yourself, or much more importantly for your
child, to come into contact with the live virus, and submit to
millions and millions of live, replicating viruses circulating for
days and days? Does it not make more sense to instead get a vaccine
that injects a sterilized and killed tiny portion of that same virus?
I have chosen this option for my children and for myself (including
during my pregnancies) for over a decade and have no regrets.

The problem with subunit vaccines is that since they contain only a
part of the virus, they often cannot stimulate a complete immune
response, especially in those with weak immune systems such as young
children, the elderly, or those with chronic diseases. For that
reason, scientists add adjuvants to vaccines. Adjuvants are immune-
system stimulators that enhance the response to the vaccine.

The H1N1 vaccine contains an oil-in-water adjuvant called squalene.
Squalene is a naturally occurring sterilized oil. Oil-in-water
adjuvants have been studied and approved as safe and are used in
various European vaccines including their flu shots.

Something that really puzzles me is how quickly people will put into
their own and their children's bodies anything labelled as an immune
stimulant if it is sold in a natural-products store. These products do
not have long-term safety data, are much less rigorously tested for
safety than vaccines and adjuvants, and claims are often supported by
very poor quality studies that were done by the very companies selling
the product.

There is a question I am frequently asked: If the nurses, paramedics,
and hospital workers are not getting vaccinated, doesn't that suggest
that I should be concerned about getting vaccinated?

It is interesting that the rate of vaccination among health-care
workers is similar to the rate in the general population. The reason
for this seems to be that health-care workers obtain their information
about the vaccine and influenza the same way as the general public.
They Google, read newspapers, and talk among themselves. There are no
requirements for health-care workers to participate in any educational
programs related to vaccines or influenza.

To protect those at high risk from influenza, whom the vaccine does
not protect well because of their weak immune response, it is
important that their caregivers be vaccinated so that they do not
infect them. It is particularly worrying that health-care workers
could infect or kill our most vulnerable by choosing not to be
vaccinated. Research indicates that H1N1 is infectious one day before
symptoms, and up to seven to 10 days afterwards.

H1N1 is now present in our communities and will be spreading quickly.
It's time for all of us to come together and protect ourselves and our
families, and help to protect the vulnerable in our community. One way
to do that is to get vaccinated. The vaccine takes two weeks to
stimulate immunity, so it's important to be vaccinated as soon as
possible. That's what my family is planning to do.

Catherine D'Amico is a family doctor in Ottawa.

© Copyright (c) The Montreal Gazette

Very few flu deaths because it has always been this way

For the first time, we monitor deaths due to flu and find that very
few actually die from common flu. Statistics on flu in the past had
always been estimates and models that are now proven to be completely
wrong.

The only way this phenomena can be explained is that those who catch
swine flu is also immune to common flu. That makes a mockery of the
practise of taking vaccines for 3 varieties of flu if getting swine
flu which is H1N1 will also protect all varieties of flu as well.

It is better to check your ESTMATES and never pretend that ESTIMATES
are facts.


"To keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to
safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of
them imaginary."
Obama Administration's Flu Fearmongering


Michael Fumento Bio
Print friendly
E-mail a friend
Contact Us


By Michael Fumento Wednesday, October 28, 2009
"In keeping with the administration's proactive approach" to swine
flu, the White House has announced, President Obama on Saturday
declared the disease "a national emergency." It's the second such
declaration, with the first in late April. And in case you didn't know
what "proactive" meant before, now you do: "hysterical."

Just nine weeks ago the President's Council of Advisors on Science and
Technology issued its report with a "plausible scenario" of 30,000 to
90,000 deaths peaking in "mid-October." It's now late October and past
time for a reality check.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) no longer
releases specific swine flu case or death numbers, so the agency
merely said Friday it had killed more than 1,000 Americans and
hospitalized over 20,000 in the almost 7 months since the outbreak
began. The website flucount.org, basing its figures on media reports,
lists about 1,100. The FluTracker website counts a much higher 2,800.

But even that largest figure is about the number of Americans the CDC
estimates seasonal flu kills every 10 days during the season,
specifically 36,000 deaths and 200,000 hospitalizations annually.

Yes, swine flu disproportionately afflicts the young. But it's simply
a larger slice of much smaller pie. Hence among 47,000 college
students afflicted seriously enough with CDC-defined "flu-like
illness" to seek medical help, according to an American College Health
Association running survey, there have been only78 hospitalizations
and zero deaths.

Nor is there reason to think things will worsen.

In Australia and New Zealand, flu season has ended and almost all
cases were swine flu. Yet even without a vaccine, those countries have
reported significantly fewer flu deaths than normal.

Worldwide in seven months swine flu has claimed almost 5,000 people
according to the World Health Organization, at the low end of the
range the agency estimates die from seasonal flu every seven days.

Further, the virus isn't mutating into a worse form; it appears the
outbreak may already have crested in some states; and in fact a Purdue
University study in the journal Eurosurveillance calculates the
national epidemic should peak this week.

So where's the fire, Mr. President?

Well, in fairness there's plenty of smoke.

But it's not the virus itself driving these masses; it's flu frenzy
The CDC reports that the percentage of visits to emergency rooms and
outpatient clinics by people worried they have the flu—and worried
enough to seek medical attention—is incredibly high: over 7 percent.
That's double from just six weeks ago and the highest since 2003. In
Region Six, encompassing Texas and nearby states, it's almost 10
percent.

Some swamped emergency facilities have erected tents to accommodate
the overflow, while patients at others wait up to 24 hours for a bed.

But it's not the virus itself driving these masses; it's flu frenzy.
The CDC reports that only 37 percent of samples from its laboratory
surveillance system are testing positive. That means only about a
third of the samples that even doctors (much less scared patients)
suspect may show swine flu actually do so. In the especially panicky
region Region Six, merely a fifth indicate swine flu—the lowest level
in months.

Moreover, many of those emergency visitors may actually have flu but
with symptoms so mild that in previous years they'd have stayed home
and self-treated.

But panic is what this pandemic is all about it. It's driven by a
perpetual motion machine of journalists writing about scared people,
thereby creating more scared people to write about. And clearly the
Obama Administration stoked it with that first health emergency
declaration and with the President's Council report.

It's not just that the panic was predictable; it was predicted. The
"only realistic aspect of President's Council scenario, I wrote in
another newspaper in early September, "is that emergency facilities
could be swamped. But rather than with truly sick people, it will be
with the mildly ill and the worried well." Ironically, this new
emergency declaration can only help bring porcine flu panic to greater
heights.

Why issue it, then? Maybe because government, H.L Mencken has
observed, ever seeks "to keep the populace alarmed (and hence
clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series
of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."

Perhaps the Obama administration doesn't deserve such cynicism in this
matter. Perhaps. But if it reacts so poorly to a non-crisis, what can
we expect when it's faced with a real one?

Michael Fumento is director of the non-profit Independent Journalism
Project where he specializes in health and science issues. He can be
reached at Fumento@pobox.com.

Sunday 25 October 2009

US declares Swine Flu Emergency

It the the chinese news agency that is more informative. It appears
that US news agencies are trying to downplay this emergency for fear
of disrupting the economy.

The chinese, on the other hand, had been on emergencies all these
while, ever since the first Swine Flu was detected. As a result it has
suffered much less than US that had taken the easy way out.

And yet, even after an emergency had been declared, there is no panic
at all in USA. In fact, people have become relieved. At least it
allows hospitals to prepare. Just people are preparing, does not mean
that they are panicking. Honesty has always been the best policy. It
allows people to take special precautions effectively.

If you hide information, people will take excessive precautions, since
there is no information at all. Those who don't want to take chances,
will assume all the worst possibilities.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5g8-DEMtAE9q4i4ySQ0eV_qZefmRQD9BHSMPG0

AP Top News at 11:52 p.m. EDT
(AP) – 10 hours ago
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama declared the swine flu outbreak a
national emergency, giving his health chief the power to let hospitals
move emergency rooms offsite to speed treatment and protect
noninfected patients. The declaration, signed Friday night and
announced Saturday, comes with the disease more prevalent than ever in
the country and production delays undercutting the government's
initial, optimistic estimates that as many as 120 million doses of the
vaccine could be available by mid-October.
Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

http://english.cctv.com/program/newshour/20091025/102000.shtml

Shortage of vaccine causes discontent in US
2009-10-25 13:36 BJT
Special Report: World tackles A/H1N1 flu |
Mail |  Share  | Print | Text: A A A
Watch Video

Play Video
US President Barack Obama has declared the A/H1N1 flu outbreak a
national emergency. It comes amid production delays for the flu's
vaccine.
Some Americans are not alarmed by the national emergency, but many
seem dissatisfied with the shortage of vaccine.
Several high schools in Washington specially designated for
inoculations began providing A/H1N1 flu vaccinations Saturday.
In the early morning, a long line forms.
Washington Resident, said, "I come early in case there's no vaccine."
Though the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention vows to supply
enough vaccine for those who plan to get inoculated, many states in
the country face shortages.
Washington Resident, said, "Terrible, it takes much long time to
make."
The CDC admits the production of the vaccine is taking longer than
expected.
As planned, as many as 40 million doses could be available by mid-
October. Currently, only 13 million doses have been supplied.
The CDC cut down its target of producing 200 million doses by the end
of November to less than 70 million.
No panic, however, is caused by the government declaring a national
emergency and the shortage of vaccine.
Shelley Cohel, Washington Resident, said, "I believe there will be
enough vaccine"
Even if the vaccine is not available, many say keeping healthy, and
following doctors' orders will be helpful.
Editor: Zhang Pengfei | Source: CCTV.com