Thursday 31 December 2009

Lowering IPTA Academic requirement will disqualify Malaysia's Engineering

Proposal to evaluate the award of IPTA degrees based only on 70%
academic achievement will mean that Malaysian Universities will fail
the Washington Accord agreement standards for engineering
qualification.

http://www.washingtonaccord.org/Rules_and_Procedures.pdf
SECTION C – GUIDELINES
1. GRADUATE PROFILE EXEMPLARS

Page 37 of 56


Even hands-on training is limited to 10% of the total credit hours,
let alone extra curricular activities.

If the hands-on exceed 10%, it means that we are training
technologists, i.e. technicians, not engineers. At least that is what
the current EAC director told us, and I happen to agree with him
fully.


http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v5/newsindex.php?id=465503


IPTA Admission Requirements Reviewed To Meet Job Market Demands -
Saifuddin
KUNDASANG (Sabah), Dec 31 (Bernama) -- The proposal to impose
admission requirement based on 70 per cent academic and 30 per cent co-
curriculum merit for public institutions of higher learning (IPTA) is
being considered to meet job market demands, Deputy Higher Education
Minister Datuk Saifuddin Abdullah said on Thursday.

At present, he said, the admission requirement for matriculation
students and Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) and Sijil Tinggi
Persekolahan Malaysia (STPM) holders was still based on 90 per cent
academic and 10 per cent co-curriculum merit.

"Right now, the selection of students to IPTA is done based on 90 per
cent academic and 10 per cent co-curriculum merit.

"But, once the students are accepted into the university, they will be
evaluated based on 70 per cent academic and 30 per cent co-curriculum
merit.

"When they graduate, the first thing their potential employers will
ask is about their experience and skills, not their academic results,
even for first-class degree holders.

"So, the proposed intake requirement is being considered because the
current job market demands a balance between academic results and co-
curriculum," he said after sending off Mohd Noor Mat Amin on his solo
mission to scale Mount Kinabalu, at the Kinabalu National Park near
here.

Saifuddin said some of the employers had even lamented on the quality
of fresh graduates, especially those who were inactive in co-
curriculum activities.

Hence, the deputy minister called on 152 students associations
nationwide to be proactive in organising more activities to increase
their co-curriculum merit.

-- BERNAMA

Re: Malaysia's court ruling: Allah is not exclusive to Islam

On Dec 31, 9:43 pm, Paul Saccani <sacc...@omen.net.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:55:56 -0800 (PST), "Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj.
>
> Ahmad" <othm...@lycos.com> wrote:
> >Even in Indonesia, where Allah is used sporadically in the translation
> >of the Bible, its use is discrete and are not meant to mislead, unlike
> >in Malaysia.
>
> >Allah is substituted for Jesus when it should be just god.
>
> Actually, it isn't.

Because you are completely arrogant and ignorant.

>
> >The bible
> >never uses the word Allah as a translation to God. Allah is not a
> >Malay word for God. The Malay word for God is Tuhan.
> >In Malay, Allah is meant to be the God of Muslims.
>
> Which in Islamic theology is the God of Abraham and Jesus - the self
> same God.

That is the god in Islamic theology, but certainly not the Christian
theology.
In Christianity, Jesus is himself the God, which is completely
nonsense in the Malay meaning of the word
Allah.

Prehistoric Arab may have used the word Allah to refer to one
particular god, but Muslim Arabs have redefined the meaning of Allah
to be the one god, according to the Islamic theology.

There is no such confusion in Malay. Allah in Malay is the one god
according to the Islamic theology. There is no pre-Islamic Malay word
for Allah, let alone to describe a deity. Only tuhan(supreme god) or
dewa-dewa. So Allah in Malay is the God as defined in Islamic
theology, not any god or deity.


>
> > Since the bible is
> >to be translated to Malaysian Malay, it must be translated according
> >to the normal rules of translation, not to mislead the readers.
>
> As the bible is a sacred text to Muslims, that is hardly going to
> happen, is it?

What are you trying to imply? You must be abosolutely lying if you
think Muslims consider the current translated bible as SACRED.

Malay muslims respect the translated quran in similar manner to
translated bible, i.e. with cautions. Malay muslims only respect the
original quran in Arabic words despite not understanding many Arabic
words.

This is similar to most Muslims all over the world, even Arabs who may
not completely understand the Arabic words and phrases used in the
Quran.

Any quran, that is to be translated to modern Arabic will never be
respected.
And you expect Muslims to respect the current Bibles in various
translated forms and consider them as sacred?
You are a complete moron.

>
> >Why on Earth should Christians in Malaysia want to use the word Allah
> >to describe God when the correct translation is Tuhan? Unless it is
> >attempting to mislead readers to consider that that Jesus is also the
> >god of the Malays, which is completely nonsense.
>
> Well, you see, there was fellow called Muhammad, and his message was
> that the God of the Christians and the God of the Jews was called
> Allah.

So what you are saying is that Jesus is also the Allah of the Muslims?
Bloody misleading arrogant bastard.

Unless it is the bible of some cultish Christianity that thrive in
Indonesia but this is frowned upon by mainstream Christianity.

I have to agree that these christianity cults who abandon the trinity
concept, and returning to true monotheism, should be allowed to use
the word Allah, but certainly not the bible used by Catholics. This is
true even if they don't accept Muhammad as a prophet.

Catholics and almost all protestants that I can name, believe in the
trinity concept where Jesus(son), Father and (Holy Spirit) are three
separate entities of god, to be treated as one.

From Wikipedia, at the top of Google search list:
"Trinity teaches the unity of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as three
persons in one Godhead.[1] "

To use the word Allah for this "Godhead" is just preposterous. It
implies that Jesus is also Allah, which is alien to the Malays.


>
> Some people heeded his message, and today they are called muslims.

You do not understand Islam at all. No wonder you are not a Muslim.
If you accept the true Malay meaning of Allah, I am sure muslims will
call you a Muslim, despite you denying Muhamamd. Got it!!! You don't
have to be a follower of Muhamamd to be called a Muslim, in Islam.

Alas, you and the christians in Malaysia, want to mislead Malays, into
thinking that the trinity, i.e. Jesus, is compatible with the Malay's
Allah, instead of just Tuhan.

If you do not consider this as misleading, you just an arrogant
bastard.


>
> Perhaps you could find someone who knows something about Islam to
> explain this to you?

So you think you know more about Islam than I do? That you don't need
anybody who knows anything about Islam to explain Islamic fundamentals
to you?


>
> >Just because Allah is not exclusive to Islam, does not mean that it
> >can be used without any just cause. Just because Koran is not
> >exclusive to Islam, does not mean that it can be used to translate the
> >word "Bible"  into Koran in Malay. This is what it amounts to.
>
> A reasonably educated Muslim should know better than this.

Yes, but you certainly isn't.

>
> >If the Christians want to translate the Bible to Malay, then use
> >proper Malay words and grammar. Usually poor Malay grammar and words
> >is an insult to the language and customs of the Malays and Muslims.
> >Use the correct word for God, i.e. Tuhan!!!
>
> That would be offensive to anyone who accepts that Muhammad was the
> messenger of God.

So you think Malays don't pray to "Tuhan"? Idiot bastard.
In fact, Malays pray to "Tuhan", not to Allah. Just read a few
prayers written in Malay for you to find out.
Allah is treated more like a name of a god, not the god entity itself.

Even Arabs use the word Ila, for God, not allah, and all muslims must
know how to distinguish between these two words, if not they are not
muslims.

Read the most important phrase in Islam: "La Ila ha ill allah"

Translated into English : No god except Allah.
Malay: Tiada Tuhan melainkan Allah.

Now tell me how can Christians in Malaysia be allowed to use the word
Allah for God when even Muslims use the word Tuhan to refer to God??

Unless they are trying to mislead the Malays about the trinity message
of Christianity.
Any honest person should be able to answer but you certainly are not
honest.

> --
> Cheers
> Paul Saccani
> Perth, Western Australia.

Malaysia's court ruling: Allah is not exclusive to Islam

Even in Indonesia, where Allah is used sporadically in the translation
of the Bible, its use is discrete and are not meant to mislead, unlike
in Malaysia.

Allah is substituted for Jesus when it should be just god. The bible
never uses the word Allah as a translation to God. Allah is not a
Malay word for God. The Malay word for God is Tuhan.

In Malay, Allah is meant to be the God of Muslims. Since the bible is
to be translated to Malaysian Malay, it must be translated according
to the normal rules of translation, not to mislead the readers.

Why on Earth should Christians in Malaysia want to use the word Allah
to describe God when the correct translation is Tuhan? Unless it is
attempting to mislead readers to consider that that Jesus is also the
god of the Malays, which is completely nonsense.

Just because Allah is not exclusive to Islam, does not mean that it
can be used without any just cause. Just because Koran is not
exclusive to Islam, does not mean that it can be used to translate the
word "Bible" into Koran in Malay. This is what it amounts to.

If the Christians want to translate the Bible to Malay, then use
proper Malay words and grammar. Usually poor Malay grammar and words
is an insult to the language and customs of the Malays and Muslims.
Use the correct word for God, i.e. Tuhan!!!

Malaysian court rules Catholic paper can use "Allah"
Royce Cheah
KUALA LUMPUR
Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:57am EST
Related News
School holidays in Malaysia, time for circumcision
Mon, Nov 23 2009
KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) - A Malaysian court ruled on Thursday that a
Catholic newspaper can use "Allah" to describe God in a surprise
judgment that could allay worries about the erosion of minority rights
in the majority Muslim country.

WORLD

The High Court said it was the constitutional right for the Catholic
newspaper, the Herald, to use the word "Allah."

"Even though Islam is the federal religion, it does not empower the
respondents to prohibit the use of the word," said High Court judge
Lau Bee Lan.

Last January, Malaysia banned the use of the word "Allah" by
Christians, saying the use of the Arabic word might offend the
sensitivities of Muslims who make up 60 per cent of Malaysia's 28
million population.

Analysts say cases such as that involving the Herald worry Malaysian
Muslim activists and officials who see using the word Allah in
Christian publications including bibles as attempts to proselytize.

The Herald circulates in Sabah and Sarawak on Borneo Island where most
tribal people converted to Christianity more than a century ago.

In February, the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Kuala Lumpur Murphy
Pakiam, as publisher of the Herald, filed for a judicial review,
naming the Home Ministry and the government as respondents.

He had sought to declare that the decision by the respondents
prohibiting him from using the word "Allah" in the Herald was illegal
and that the word "Allah" was not exclusive to Islam.

The Home Minister's decision to ban the use of the word was illegal,
null and void, said Lau.

Lawyers representing the government said they would refer to the Home
Ministry on whether to appeal.

"It is a day of justice and we can say right now that we are citizens
of one nation," said Father Lawrence Andrew, the Herald's editor.

Christians -- including about 800,000 Catholics -- make up about 9.1
percent of Malaysia's population. Malays are by definition Muslims and
are not allowed to convert.

Malaysia was rated as having "very high" government restrictions on
religion in a recent survey by the Pew Forum, bracketing it with the
likes of Iran and Egypt and it was the 9th most restrictive of 198
countries.

Published since 1980, the Herald newspaper is printed in English,
Mandarin, Tamil and Malay. The Malay edition is mainly read by tribes
in the eastern states of Sabah and Sarawak on Borneo Island.

Ethnic Chinese and Indians, who are mainly Christians, Buddhists and
Hindus, have been upset by court rulings on conversions and other
religious disputes as well as demolitions of some Hindu temples.

(Editing by Nick Macfie)

Lessons for those who believe Swine Flu is milder than Common Flu

Swine Flu is not fatal is well treated as shown by Germany, China and
Japan.

Only those who treat Swine Flu lightly suffer unnecessary deaths.
Without any treatment and ICU, Swine Flu is as deadly as Spanish Flu
of 1918. It is only the wide availability of Tamilflu that had reduced
fatalities. But those nations that enforce quarantine had fared much
better because their ICU facilities are not stretched.

China had done well at the early stages with its aggressive quarantine
but slacked with its quarantine as Swine Flu spreads to its regions.

Among developed nations, Australia suffer the most because its Health
Authorities treat Swine Flu as milder than Common Flu.

"A World Health Organization report shows Japan's mortality rate is 2
deaths for every 100,000 people. The rate is higher by 11 times in the
U.K., 16 times in the U.S. and 43 times in Australia

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601124&sid=auxGTNXRwuAI

Japan Mask Wearing, Tamiflu Rush Beat Back Swine Flu Threat
Share Business ExchangeTwitterFacebook| Email | Print | A A A
By Kanoko Matsuyama and Jason Gale


Dec. 11 (Bloomberg) -- Eight hours after Tokyo office worker Shungo
Yamamoto started feeling feverish and faint, he got a diagnosis of
swine flu, received antiviral drugs and embarked on three days of self-
imposed isolation last month.

"I knew it was influenza immediately" because of the fever and joint
pain, Yamamoto, 25, said. His doctor confirmed the diagnosis with a
nose swab test and prescribed five days of Roche Holding AG's
antiviral drug Tamiflu. When he left the doctor's office, Yamamoto put
on a mask, bought a three-day supply of food, rented DVDs and headed
home, where he stayed for the duration of his illness.

Japan's aggressiveness against H1N1 influenza, the result of hygiene
standards, social etiquette and a willingness to test and medicate
immediately, means the country has fared better than the U.S. or the
U.K. in battling the first pandemic in 41 years. A World Health
Organization report shows Japan's mortality rate is 2 deaths for every
100,000 people. The rate is higher by 11 times in the U.K., 16 times
in the U.S. and 43 times in Australia.

"No doctor in Japan would tell a flu patient just to go home and sleep
it off," said Norio Sugaya, a pediatric specialist at Keiyu Hospital
in Yokohama, a port city south of Tokyo. Sugaya sits on a committee
that advises WHO, a Geneva- based arm of the United Nations, on
managing swine flu patients.

In the U.K., a study this month found patients typically waited three
days to start taking Tamiflu, one of two medicines available to fight
the new virus as well as seasonal influenza.

Complication Risk

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, based in Atlanta,
recommends that antiflu drugs be given to hospitalized patients,
pregnant women and others with increased risk of complications. In
Japan, doctors are advised to administer the medicines to anyone
suspected of having flu, even if a rapid diagnostic test is negative,
according to the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, a Tokyo-
based organization of specialist doctors that provides treatment
recommendations.

Japan accounted for three-quarters of the Tamiflu dispensed globally
in the drug's first five years of sale, Roche, based in Basel,
Switzerland, said in a November 2005 filing to the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration.

Three years later, Japan's government announced plans to stockpile
enough antiflu medicines for 45 percent of its 128 million people.
That may be triple the amount required to treat every swine flu
patient. The proportion of people sickened by the pandemic virus
ranges from 7 percent to 15 percent, depending on the country,
according to WHO.

Japanese Practices

Japan's status as one of the biggest users of antiviral medicines and
its approach to treating seasonal and pandemic flu should be compared
with practices elsewhere and the data should be published in English,
said Lance Jennings, a clinical virologist with Canterbury Health
Laboratories in Christchurch, New Zealand, who has studied flu for
more than 30 years.

"If you have better capacity to diagnose cases earlier and are
treating appropriately and early, you're more likely to reduce the
number of patients who will go on to develop more- severe influenza,"
Jennings said in an interview.

While the majority of pandemic flu sufferers got over their illness
within days without treatment, 1 percent to 10 percent needed
hospitalization and as many as a quarter of those patients required
intensive care, WHO said on Dec. 4.

Early Treatment

Tamiflu and Relenza, an inhaled medicine made by London- based
GlaxoSmithKline Plc, appear beneficial in fighting the H1N1 virus,
especially if treatment begins within 48 hours of the onset of
symptoms, researchers said in a study in the New England Journal of
Medicine in November. A paper in the same journal in December reported
reduced complications, including deaths, among hospitalized patients
treated with the medications.

A survey of Japanese patients in 2005 found 85 percent sought medical
treatment for flu and 90 percent of consultations took place within 48
hours after the first symptoms appeared, according to David Reddy, who
heads Roche's influenza task force in Basel.

"These people do not wait until it's too late," Reddy said in a
telephone interview. "Japan has to be the gold standard of management
of influenza. It's almost a societal response in terms of the way
people modify their behavior."

Japanese have become accustomed during the past decade to wearing
masks in public to ward off allergic reactions to pollen from cedar
trees throughout the country, said Masataka Yoshikawa, a researcher
who tracks consumer behavior at Hakuhodo Institute of Life and Living,
the research arm of a Tokyo-based advertising company. Japanese expect
someone with a cold or flu to wear a mask to limit the spread of the
virus, he said.

Wash and Gargle

"Hand-washing, gargling and wearing masks are three hygiene measures
that are very well accepted in the community in Japan," said Nikki
Shindo, the Japanese doctor who is leading WHO's investigation of
swine flu patients. "People don't really hesitate to wear masks in
public places. Even the 24/7 convenience stores sell high-particulate
respirators at a reasonable price."

Some researchers say they are skeptical that Tamiflu is effective and
concerned that the virus will develop resistance to the drug because
of misuse. An analysis of 20 studies published in the British Medical
Journal on Dec. 8 showed Tamiflu offered mild benefits for healthy
adults and found no proof it prevented lower respiratory tract
infections or complications of flu. There is little evidence to show
that otherwise healthy people should be given Tamiflu routinely, the
researchers said.

'No Doubt'

"Based on our analysis and other subsequent work, there is no doubt
that the drug can reduce complications," said Frederick Hayden, a
professor of clinical virology at the University of Virginia School of
Medicine in Charlottesville, who was one of the first doctors to study
Tamiflu in patients.

Missing doses or failing to complete a course of medicine increases
the risk that a drug-evading strain will emerge, said William Aldis,
an assistant professor of global health at Thammasat University in
Bangkok and a former WHO representative to Thailand. In societies such
as Japan, where treatment compliance is high, patients are less likely
to contribute to drug resistance, he said.

"So this is one more reason to think carefully before applying Japan's
approach elsewhere," Aldis said.

Japan, whose flu season typically peaks between January and March, may
face more deaths from H1N1 if the infection trend follows that of
seasonal flu, said Hitoshi Oshitani, a virology professor at Tohoku
University in Sendai, in northern Japan.

"Japan will enter its regular peak flu season from now, and we have to
observe whether the pattern continues or not," he said. Oshitani, who
advises WHO on pandemic strategies for developing nations, also
credits the country's school-closure program for helping battle swine
flu.

To contact the reporters on this story: Kanoko Matsuyama in Tokyo at
kmatsuyama2@bloomberg.net; Jason Gale at j.gale@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: December 10, 2009 10:05 EST

Tuesday 29 December 2009

Who intimidate who? Police or the citizens?

Intimidation must be accompanied with the ability to commit violence.
How can the citizens commit violence against the police?

Unless police is intimidated when its actions are questioned by the
citizens, especially elected representatives.
Actions such as violence against witnesses and suspects resulting in
deaths, which are widely reported and yet no successful prosecution.

But demanding actions demanded by the law of justice, is not
intimidating, it is called fighting for justice. It is those who stop
the fighters of justice who are doing the intimidating.

Actions speak louder than words.
How many citizens died under police custody? Many. Just because the
police had never been found guilty is not surprising when those doing
the investigations are the police themselves.

How many policemen died as a result of direct actions of opposition
elected representatives. None.

You can also apply this to the Israeli Jews versus Palestinian Arabs.
Who do you think intimidate who?

You have to be consistent with your judgement if you really believe in
justice.


It's police intimidation, says Liew

GEORGE TOWN (Dec 28, 2009) : The Selangor police's decision to
investigate Selangor state exco Ean Yong Hian Wah after he had asked
them to cease their probe on Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng for
making allegedly seditious comments is a form of intimidation, says
Bukit Bendera MP Liew Chin Tong.


Ean Yong Hian Wah

Liew Chin Tong
Liew, in a statement, said: "Since when have the police gained such
clout that its actions are beyond public scrutiny and criticism?

"It is the most regrettable that the police has decided on such a
harsh and draconian course to quell views expressed in public sphere."

By doing so, the police is clearly "intimidating" its critics, he
said.

On Sunday, Selangor police chief Datuk Khalid Abu Bakar said Ean
Yong's statement directing the police to cease their investigation of
Lim seemed like an attempt to intimidate the police and as such, the
Seri Kembangan state assemblyman would be hauled up for questioning.

Khalid had earlier said Lim would be questioned this week for
allegedly making seditious comments after the DAP secretary-general
told a Pakatan Rakyat convention on Dec 19 that Teoh Beng Hock had
been "murdered".

Teoh, 30, the political secretary to Ean Yong, was found dead on July
16 at the fifth floor corridor of Plaza Masalam in Shah Alam, which
also houses the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) office. He
was a witness into an MACC probe on alleged abuse of state funds.

An inquest into his death is currently ongoing.

Updated: 06:26PM Mon, 28 Dec 2009

Risk of death ten times higher in children with H1N1

This is the most accurate description of the Swine Flu danger but be
careful with the data.
Is it with Tamilflu or not? Most probably some.
Is it with artificial lung treatment or not? Most probably not all.
If children were treated early with Tamilflu and given access to
artificial respirators and lung machines, fatality rate can be zero.

This is shown by developed nations such as Germany.


http://sitemason.vanderbilt.edu/news/campusnews/2009/12/28/risk-of-death-ten-times-higher-in-children-with-h1n1.102992

Risk of death ten times higher in children with H1N1
RSS feed Print email to a friend
12/28/2009
2:26 pm

A Vanderbilt researcher, while working in his native country of
Argentina, has found that children with H1N1 influenza die at a rate
10 times higher than those who suffer from seasonal flu.

Dr. Fernando Polack, the Cesar Milstein associate professor of
Pediatrics in the Department of Pediatrics at Vanderbilt, describes
the serious impact of the H1N1 influenza virus on children in an
article titled Pediatric Hospitalizations Associated with H1N1
Influenza in Argentina, published in the Dec. 23, 2009, issue of the
New England Journal of Medicine. The overall death rate with H1N1 was
1.1 per 100,000 children, compared to .1 per 100,000 for seasonal flu
in 2007.

Polack also details which children were at highest risk. Due to
Argentina's location in the southern hemisphere, Polack was able to
collect detailed surveillance data during the peak of the H1N1 virus
outbreak in Buenos Aires in June. His cohort included six hospitals
that combine to serve 1.2 million children.

"One thing that was striking was the tremendous impact on hospital
logistics. Routine surgeries were cancelled; mass infection control
practices were put in place; wards doubled-- particularly in ICU's,
with everyone working over capacity. It was pretty rough," Polack
said.

Dr. Kathryn Edwards, Sarah H. Sell Chair in Pediatrics and director of
the Vanderbilt Vaccine Research Program, is a coauthor on the article.
Edwards says the H1N1 outbreak showcases opportunities which can
result from observing opposing seasonal illness peaks from the
northern to the southern hemispheres. The hope is that scientists can
learn to respond more quickly to a developing pandemic.

"Flu is a global disease and we need to work together to understand
and deal with each flu virus," Edwards said.

The first author of the article is Argentinean pediatrician Dr. Romina
Libster, who is currently in Nashville working as a research
specialist with the VVRP. Libster said Polack realized what was
happening when reports began to arise in Mexico that a new flu virus
was causing serious illness.

Contact: Laurie Holloway (615) 322-474
laurie.holloway@vanderbilt.edu

Sunday 27 December 2009

Everyone should get innocuated with swine flu vaccine

In CAnada, 60% still had not been vaccinated. Let us see how they
survive.
My gut instinct is that we all must get it in order to prolong our
lives.

I certainly will invest money into the well being of my family. those
of us of can afford it should also be vaccinated so that it will slow
down the spread of this dangerous flu.

http://thestar.com.my/health/story.asp?file=/2009/12/27/health/5362081&sec=health

Sunday December 27, 2009
A(H1N1) vaccine by March/April 2010
By LEE TSE LING

Here's that update on flu vaccines in Malaysia you've been waiting
for.

HOW long more do we have to wait for a publicly-available A(H1N1)
influenza vaccine? Anytime from March to April, says Sanofi-Aventis
medical manager (Malaysia/Singapore/Brunei) Dr Shree Jacob.
Unlike the pandemic A(H1N1) vaccine due to arrive in January, the new
seasonal flu vaccine due to arrive in March/April will be available to
the general public, as long as they can pay for it. – AP/ Amy Sancetta

If this is news to you, it's probably, and understandably, because you
were caught up in Christmas festivities and didn't manage to catch our
news report about it on Friday.

Seasonal, not pandemic

The formulation due to arrive in March/April is the routinely produced
southern hemisphere trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine, which
arrives every year around the same time.

This year, it will contain a component that is protectective against
the A(H1N1) strain currently circulating. The new formulation is
different from the expedited pandemic A(H1N1) monovalent vaccine that
is due to arrive in January.

"Monovalent" here means the pandemic flu vaccine contains just one
viral strain ie the A(H1N1) strain everybody has been so worried
about. "Trivalent" means the seasonal flu vaccine contains three viral
strains.

One of the three strains is the A/California/7/2009-like strain, which
the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommended for inclusion in the
seasonal vaccine back in Sept.

This strain closely resembles the A(H1N1) strain currently circulating
and will protect recipients against it, confirms technical officer
with the WHO Representative Office for Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia,
and Singapore, Dr Harpal Singh.

Available, at a price

Unlike the pandemic A(H1N1) vaccine due to arrive in Jan, which will
only be available from public hospitals and clinics to frontliners and
high-risk groups, the new seasonal vaccine will be available as usual
to the general public (as long as they can pay for it) through private
hospitals and clinics that stock it.

Normally, the seasonal flu vaccine costs below RM100. (Between RM40
and RM60, consultant cardiologist Datuk Dr Khoo Kah Lin told us a
while back.)

Their arrival is good news, says recently appointed Health Ministry
disease control director Dr Lokman Hakim Sulaiman.

"We very much welcome these new seasonal vaccines, which should also
protect against A(H1N1). The public will now have access to the
vaccine," he told Fit4Life.

In other news

Malaysia will not be one of the 95 nations receiving pandemic A(H1N1)
WHO vaccine from its stockpile of donations sourced from various
governments, foundations, and manufacturers.

Not surprising, as Malaysia did not request vaccine aid. (Nations that
did were then selected based on their vulnerability to the pandemic
and their readiness and ability to use the vaccine for priority
populations.)

If we had requested aid, we would not have qualified, says Dr Harpal.
After all, "Malaysia has already procured their own vaccines, compared
to countries like Somalia and Sierra Leone, which can't even afford to
initiate discussions," he explains.

Who should/shouldn't get it?

High-risk groups for complications should, advises Dr Lokman.

Generally, these groups include the elderly, the pregnant, those with
chronic conditions or suppressed immune systems, and those in nursing
homes or long-term care facilities.

However, the ministry's policy on vaccination for high-risk groups,
like any other vaccination, still very much depends on the indication
of use from the vaccine manufacturer, which they are awaiting.

Generally, people who should not get the vaccine include those
allergic to eggs or previous flu vaccines. For other
contraindications, consult your doctor.

What about other instances that aren't so clear-cut? Healthy
travellers, for example. Or those who aren't at risk, but can afford
to purchase it.

On one hand, widespread vaccination prevents the target virus from
hanging around in a community for long.

That doesn't just reduce infections. It prevents the virus from
meeting, mingling, and mutating with other flu viruses in human
bodies.

On the other hand, we can't deny vaccines can cause adverse effects,
however rare or small.

So what should you do? Decide. With your doctor, weigh the risk
factors you and your loved ones face. Consider which is higher - the
risk associated with getting vaccinated (eg adverse effects) or the
risk associated with not getting vaccinated (eg flu complications)?

If you're young, fit, and in robust health, the balance obviously tips
in favour of not needing vaccination. But if you have, say, chronic
heart disease, then the balance tips the other way.

Ultimately, what we should all keep in mind is that vaccination is not
the end-all when it comes to flu mitigation. Public health measures
like practising good hygiene, cough/sneeze etiquette, and social
distancing when ill, Dr Lokman stresses, remain a cornerstone of
prevention for all.

Friday 25 December 2009

Re: Brain Drain from Malaysia

On Dec 24, 12:10 pm, Tanki <5191...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Brain Drain Plan
> Posted by: Yogeswaran Gopala Krishnan
> We have talked and debated about the brain drain situation in
> Malaysia. It is happening in front of our very own eyes and more often
> then not, we are left wondering why not enough is done to plug this
> hole
>
> Now, if we carefully think about it, maybe the country can benefit
> from brain drains.
>
> We have a growing number of unemployed graduates who can't speak
> English.  If the clever ones who are able to articulate in English can
> leave the country, we would have enough jobs for these low performers.
>
> Malaysia is not a design hub but more of a Manufacturing/Agricultural
> country. Let's face it, we don't have to be rocket scientists to
> control operators and make sure factory operations runs. It does not

Actually we still have these brilliant scientists, and many of them
are chinese in Malaysia, but their views are not taken seriously
because the leaders and those in power don't understand anything at
all.

As usual, just because they don't understand new ideas, it means that
these ideas are all wrong.

Low salaries is not the main reason why a nation is so backward. Look
at China and Russia. Their salaries are low but most citizens are
still loyal to their nations and will not take up offers of better pay
overseas.

In Malaysia there is a general belief that leaders and decision makers
need not know what they do. This is clearly shown by the Malaysian
federal government policy that anyone can be leaders in agencies
despite them not qualified to work in these fields. For example,
geologists head account departments, and vice versa.

So clearly brain drain is not the reason but idiocy is.

Why Malaysians tolerate idiocy and blame it on brain-drain?

Because Malaysians don't really care. They only care for getting
better paid jobs instead of improving the lives of Malaysians in
general.

The reason is actually very simple. Malaysians think that they are
alright but statistics don't lie.
The income gap is the same as sahara nations, i.e. the worst in the
world.
The human trafficking and slavery is among the worst in Malaysia.
Water and electricity supply is also among the worst in the world
judging from the electric lines shown in the towns in Darfur, Sudan
well known to be the worst in the world.

Malaysians are proud of their development. It certainly looks better
than Mecca of Saudi Arabia, but Bangladeshis are laughing at the state
of development in Kota Kinabalu.

Imagine nobody complain when Johor has no water at all in their water
reserve tanks and yet nobody complained while Singapore cried and
wailed when their water reserve tanks are still half-full.

Despite all these miserable statistics of Malaysia, and the obvious
excesses of the police and enforcement agencies reinforced by
illogical court judgements that don't seem to understand simple
English phrases, the same government is returned to power with
overwhelming majority.

The bottom line is that, Malaysians have never really suffered
compared to Russia and China.
The only cure is for Malaysia to fall into chaos and disasters before
Malaysians react logically to preserve their livelihood. It is going
to be painful and will take decades of pain, just like what History
had told us.

Look at Zimbabwe.


> even have to run efficiently as Malaysia does have a certain low
> production cost advantage to all these multinational companies, who
> will likely to continue to invest.
>
> Yes, going backwards is the way forward……it will benefit the country
> and politicians.
>
> Low performers do not need to be highly paid. Where are they going to
> go? They are not competitive and cannot survive anywhere else except
> in Malaysia. They are not smart, English illiterates, contented
> without any ambition and hence easily controlled and manipulated.
>
> With all the highly paid intelligent people gone (they are now
> Singapore's problem), the country can is able to function at a lower
> cost.
>
> Sure, income from the taxes will be reduced but we have PETRONAS, to
> take care of the Politician's….ahem….the People's needs as there will
> be more oil money to go around – remember, there will less intelligent
> people to question how the money is being spent.
>
> The unintelligent people will not argue and will grab whatever crumbs
> (i.e. Development Projects) that are thrown at them.
>
> The Plan is Fail Proof!

Thursday 17 December 2009

Is Swine Flu really mild?

Despite the not coming of my prediction of severe deaths in November,
the 2nd wave actually hit.

The number of deaths had been minimised but still very tragic, but why
the 2nd wave? People dropped their guard allowing the 2nd wave. Once
they realise how bad it was, people and doctors start taking
precautions.

The good news is that in Malaysia, from the worst death incidences,
due mostly to non-usage of Tamilflu, despite their availability, it is
now zero. Doctors in Malaysia are now well trained. For instance, my 2-
year old nephew got mild flu, but chest sound and later X-ray
confirmed the start of a pneumonia at a specialist hospital. He was
quickly prescribed Tamilflu and antibiotics. He was quickly cured.
Just imagine what will happen if he were treated mildly as had
happened in the early days in Malaysia. Despite having high fever and
chest pains, doctors still do not consider it as swine flu. Let alone
have an X-ray. My nephew didn't see a specialist first, he was seen by
a general practitioner at SMC but probably they are more experienced
and caring than new government doctors.

The 2nd wave was stopped because vaccinations were started and people
in US start taking precautions. Prior to the 2nd wave in November, 20%
doctors didn't prescribe Tamilflu immediately, and yet it had strained
the US health care.

By December only 1 in 7 US citizens got the Swine flu and yet, some
healthcare already strained. Vaccination is ongoing but slow moving.
The usual peak flu season is January to March when school resumes.
December is vacation time.

Let us hope that more citizens opt for the vaccination because even if
only 2 out of 7 remained unvaccinated, it will likely overburden their
health care.

Why should Malaysia care? We never have any peak flu season but many
of us visit US and they may return to Malaysia bringing this flu
pandemic.


http://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2009/12/mild_pandemic_bite_your_tongue.php
Mild pandemic? Bite your tongue.

Category: Pandemic preparedness • Swine flu
Posted on: December 16, 2009 6:44 AM, by revere

A spot-on column in CIDRAP Business Source [subscription] by Center
for Infectious Disease Research and Policy's (CIDRAP) Director, Mike
Osterholm, reminded me to say something I've wanted to say for a long
time. We should banish the word "mild" from the influenza lexicon.
There's no such thing as a mild case of influenza, any more than there
are "mild" auto accidents. There are cases that for reasons we don't
understand don't make you very sick (or sick at all), and there are
cases that can lay you lower than you ever want to be, including six
feet under. What Osterholm does with great cogency is put paid to the
idea this is a mild pandemic. His reasons will be familiar to readers
here, but he says them extremely well.

Both Osterholm and we find CDC's most recent estimates (November 14)
of about 10,000 deaths, 47 million infections and over 200,000
hospitalizations "credible and thoughtful." To compare the oft quoted
number of 36,000 excess deaths from seasonal flu to this 10,000 number
is an "apples and oranges" affair. The 36,000 number is an excess
mortality figure derived by different and non-comparable methods (see
our post here for more details). Here is some of Osterholm's version:

In that CDC study, only 9,000 of those estimated annual seasonal
deaths are due directly to influenza or secondary bacterial pneumonia.
The other deaths are among persons who have influenza and who die of
events like heart attacks or strokes. If you want a comparison, think
of the guy who has a heart attack while snow blowing his driveway
after a large snowstorm and whose death is labeled "storm-related."

More important, though, is what we pointed out early on. It's not just
the number of deaths but the pattern of illness in the population,
flu's descriptive epidemiology:

More than 90% of the estimated seasonal influenza deaths occur in
the elderly, who in many instances have existing serious health
conditions that mean their deaths may not be far off, regardless of
their influenza illness. We all realize that death is inevitable, and,
as a public health practitioner, I find that this mad race to
eliminate the top 10 causes of death is not always well thought
through. If we were to accomplish such a goal, there would be 10 new
leading causes of death, and I'm not so sure some of those would be
better than the current ones. But I think we can all agree that "early
deaths"—or those that occur well before our elderly years —just
shouldn't happen. The way we count influenza mortality, an influenza-
related death in an 87-year-old person with advanced Alzheimer disease
is the same as the death of a 22-year-old otherwise perfectly healthy
pregnant woman. Both deaths are equally tragic, but any reasonable
person would agree they are not equivalent public health outcomes.

[snip]

Of the estimated 9,820 deaths:

* 1,090 (11%) have occurred in children 0-17 years of age
* 7,450 (76%) in people 18-64 years of age
* 1,280 (13%) in people over 65 years of age

This age distribution differs considerably from what we see with
seasonal influenza. (Dr. Michael Osterholm, Featured article CIDRAP
BUsiness Source; subscription required)

Which brings me back to the issue of "mild" flu and mild pandemics.
While this pandemic is not 1918 (for which we can be grateful,
although no one knows what prevents this or any other pandemic from
repeating that catastrophe), it is still pretty bad, already producing
more estimated hospitalizations than seasonal flu and we aren't even
into the heart of flu season yet:

It's challenging our healthcare system unlike any previous
seasonal influenza season over the past 30 years. That makes it hard
for me to call this a "mild" pandemic. I just don't believe the term
works.

Yes, there are mild, moderate, or severe influenza illnesses on an
individual basis. But how do we describe a pandemic that hits a
limited group of people really hard and causes only "routine
influenza" for most others?

Whatever you describe it, I'm with Osterholm. Don't call anything
connected with flu, mild. Most flu infections don't have dire
consequences, but a significant number do. And we never know who is
going to win the lottery. The convergence in our views extends to the
same analogy: automobile accidents. As we've noted several times, it
doesn't make much sense to call any encounter with several tons of
moving steel "mild." It may be an encounter that produces little or no
damage, but that's luck. Anyone who's gotten the repair bill for what
can happen when hit by another car going only 5 miles per hour won't
consider the encounter "mild." More importantly, any such encounter
has the potential to be a catastrophe and the really bad ones are
often just plain dumb luck. Mostly we don't have such terrible luck.
Yet even a fender bender can be expensive or result in minor injuries
and be emotionally traumatic as well as result in lost work. Whatever
you might be tempted to call an auto accident (minor or a scratch or a
fender bender), very few people would be prone to call it "mild." And
whle the number of people killed each year in motor vehicle accidents
is roughly the same as seasonal flu, we don't usually think of our
nation's annual highway death toll of 40,000 as "mild" either. Its age
distribution isn't too different than pandemic flu's either, the
source of much anxiety to any parent whose child has just gotten their
driver's license.

It's not just that "mild" is an inapt word. It is an inapt and
dangerous idea. It is based on comparing total deaths in flu seasons
with each another, not with the public health toll they exact. It is
worse than a word not conveying the proper seriousness. It sends a
message that itself has consequences, promoting a lack of urgency
about taking rational public health measures like vaccination.

That's especially pertinent this year when we don't yet know what the
usual flu season (January to March) will bring, either with seasonal
flu or a recrudescence ("wave 3") of swine flu. As Osterholm points
out, even with available vaccine now certain in the next few months,
we are likely to find ourselves in January with a very large
proportion of the population still without immune protection.

After all, what's the hurry? It's a mild pandemic.