Sunday, 5 December 2021
Takwah is the Secret of Cycling Around the World Safely
Monday, 29 November 2021
Murder of Jamal Khassogi
Saturday, 23 October 2021
Quran must be read with understanding, verse 69 Yasin
The definition of takwah, verse 45 Yasin
Tuesday, 12 October 2021
Quran Condemns All Muslim Nations as Kafir
Quran Condemns All Muslim Nations as Kafir
Verse 47 of surah Yasin
In the verse 47 of surah Yasin,
ABDULLAH YUSUF ALI
(36:47) And when they are told, “Spend ye of (the bounties) with which Allah has provided you,” the Unbelievers say to those who believe: “Shall we then feed those whom, if Allah had so willed, He would have fed, (Himself)?- Ye are in nothing but manifest error.”Unreasonable Reasons
Malay Translation
Encourage to work hard
Selective Cash Handouts
These Excuses Predicted by the Quran
ABDULLAH YUSUF ALI
(36:49) They will not (have to) wait for aught but a single Blast: it will seize them while they are yet disputing among themselves!Economic Practicality
Social Welfare
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welfare
You can see from the above list that there is not even a single Muslim nation included, but all developed nations have social welfare,even among the richest Muslim nations do not offer social welfare. They prefer subsidies compared to social welfare, which are clearly forbidden by the verses in the Yasin quoted here. The revenues of the states are to feed the poor.
Subsidies
Subsidies are generally condemned by economic experts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidy
Reasons for Undeveloped Muslim Nations
All Muslim nations are not developed. This is a reality. You can argue that Turkey is an exception but it is pale compared to even South Africa. Turkey tried to reach a developed status by building machines forcefully but its subsidy ravaged economy cannot support these grandiose projects for long.
The problems can only be traced by the policies of Muslims themselves. It is a pity because Muslims have been awarded with the Quran and the surah Yasin is a very compact reminder of the viable polices and yet Muslims are the ones who ignore the teachings of the Quran.
In fact, the Islamicity index put Muslim nations very low in its index.
http://islamicity-index.org/wp/latest-indices-2020/
http://islamicity-index.org/wp/latest-indices-2019/
Possible Reasons Why Muslims are Undeveloped
Muslims like to codemn their leaders as being corrupt but none seemed to mind subsidies. As to subsidies helping the poor less, almost all muslims will say that they are poor enough so deserve these subsidies. As for the really poor, they only provide resources for them to survive a day or two. The reasons could be that the poor are expected to work hard in order to earn a living but this is against the Quranic intention because Quran does not expect people to rely on their fate or taqdir. In fact the Quran clearly condemns those who rely on their fates as kafir, undelievers, the highest sin in Islam. Unfortunately the Quran does not state it directly. It only gives example of the kafirs as those who condemns the poor as being fated by Allah.
Muslims are trained to rely on prayers for every action. For example, when someone is sick, they will pray to be well. Similarly, when someone is poor, they will pray to be rich. They do not seem to realise that these actions will lead to relying on fate alone which is completely forbidden by the quran as shown in the verse 47 of the Yasin. The Quran will condemn those who believe that the poor deserve their fate as being poor because Allah has ordained them to be poor. You can extend this condemnation to those those who are sick.
This kind of interpretation of the Islamic teaching is not strange to me because this is how I practise it since I can remember. I realised that it is illogical to rely on prayers first before we try anything first. God has created human beings on earth to live and it does not sense then that god will intervene just because we request for them. I need to remind people to try to solve problems themselves instead of going to prayers at the first instance. They call it accepting taqdir, i.e. accepting fate. I never like it, but I did not know that relying on fate alone is kafir, the highest sin in Islam. I am not against prayers. Human beings are helpless in many instances despite their best efforts, so in these circumstances, we must pray so that we are not frustrated. Be careful with what we pray for, because it can become like the movie Wonder Woman, 1984.
Monday, 11 October 2021
“The chapter of Yasin is the heart of the Quran.”
Sunday, 12 September 2021
DIY Transom Wheels
Wednesday, 8 September 2021
The government of Malaysia.: The government must enforce mask wearing in public places during the pandemic.
I just signed the petition "The government of Malaysia.: The government must enforce mask wearing in public places during the pandemic." and wanted to see if you could help by adding your name.
Our goal is to reach 10,000 signatures and we need more support. You can read more and sign the petition here:
http://chng.it/LT5V4D7rdf
Thanks!
othman
Sunday, 5 September 2021
ADAS Termurah, Rm 270.
Saturday, 7 August 2021
The Best Health Tracker is Huawei Band 6
Friday, 6 August 2021
Review of North Edge NL02 Smart Bracelet
I bought the North Edge NL02 Smart Bracelet from North Edge official seller at Shopee and Lazada. The NL03 is a more advanced version with a different app, Ffit.
These Blood oxygen and Blood pressure functions are accessed via the apps, not measured directly so are not accurate.
The Sleep measurements of the Z02 are shown below. Notice how similar is the total time of night sleep with Honor.These 2 pictures below are the device sub-menu.
It has alternative watch faces and even a custom one from Fial-market in the Device sun-menu.
Thursday, 29 July 2021
Dajal adalah orang Islam
Monday, 19 July 2021
Friend Reunion Story
Tuesday, 6 July 2021
Dayus Kalau Menyebar Kepalsuan
Thursday, 1 July 2021
The Price of Being Dayus
This is not the only case of Police brutality in Malaysia, but this is the only case where justice has been served. This justice cannot be achieved if the families did not fight their cases of injustice to the highest courts in Malaysia. It also shows that justice is not lost forever in Malaysia. There are still judges who still want to uphold justice.
Families of youths fatally shot by police at Glenmarie in 2010 get over RM1.5mil
SHAH ALAM (Bernama): The High Court here has awarded over RM1.5mil in damages to the families of three youths who were shot dead by police 11 years ago.
Judge Datuk Khadijah Idris made the ruling on Tuesday (June 29), after allowing the appeal by the families who were representing the youths in the suit, namely, Muhammad Shamil Shapiei, Mohd Hairul Nizam Tuah and Muhamad Hanafi Omar.
Counsel Zaid Malek, representing the families of the youths, told reporters via WhatsApp on Wednesday (June 30) that Justice Khadijah allowed the appeal by the youths’ families to set aside the decision by the registrar of the High Court, which awarded RM207,000 to the families.
"The families who were dissatisfied with the amount had appealed to the Shah Alam High Court for the damages to be reassessed and which resulted in the total sum of RM1,519,200 million awarded yesterday, ” he said.
On Aug 11, 2015, Shah Alam High Court judge Rozana Ali Yusoff dismissed the suit and ordered the plaintiffs to pay costs of RM20,000 to the defendants.
However, on Sept 1, 2016, the Court of Appeal in allowing the appeal by the families held that the police were liable for the shooting deaths of three youths and ordered the case to be remitted to the Shah Alam High Court for assessment of damages before a registrar.
Zaid also hoped that the Attorney-General’s Chambers would not appeal against the decision so that the matter could finally be put to rest.
"We also call upon the government and police to take immediate disciplinary and criminal action against the police officers responsible for the illegal execution, ” the lawyer said.
He said of the total RM1,519,200 million awarded, each family would receive over RM500,000 for general damages, estate claims, public misfeasance, aggravated damages and exemplary damages, and another RM11,200 in dependency claims for Mohd Hairul Nizam's family and RM8,000 for Muhamad Hanafi's family.
"After almost 11 years, the families of the victims of the Glenmarie shooting finally receive a modicum of justice for the immense trauma and loss that they had to endure due to the actions of the police, ” he said.
The lawsuit for assault, battery and negligence was filed in November 2013 against the police and the government by the families of Muhammad Shamil Shapiei, 15, Mohd Hairul Nizam Tuah, 20, and Muhamad Hanafi Omar, 22, who were reportedly shot by policemen on duty at Glenmarie, Shah Alam, about 4am on Nov 13, 2010.
The families of the plaintiffs also named the Shah Alam district police chief, Selangor police chief, Inspector-General of Police, the government of Malaysia and the police officers yet to be identified as the defendants.
In the statement of claim, the plaintiffs, among others, alleged that the three youths died as a result of the policemen's actions and without justification. - Bernama
Tuesday, 22 June 2021
Secrets of Happy Nation: Environmental Hardships
'World's happiest country' seeks migrants
HELSINKI: Repeatedly dubbed the happiest nation on the planet with world-beating living standards, Finland should be deluged by people wanting to relocate, but in fact it faces an acute workforce shortage.
"It's now widely acknowledged that we need a spectacular number of people to come to the country," recruiter Saku Tihverainen from agency Talented Solutions told AFP.
Workers are needed "to help cover the cost of the greying generation", the recruiter explained.
While many Western countries are battling weak population growth, few are feeling the effects as sharply as Finland.
With 39.2 over-65s per 100 working-age people, it is second only to Japan in the extent of its ageing population, according to the UN, which forecasts that by 2030 the "old age dependency ratio" will rise to 47.5.
The government has warned that the nation of 5.5 million needs to practically double immigration levels to 20,000-30,000 a year to maintain public services and plug a looming pensions deficit.
Finland might seem like an attractive destination on paper, scoring high in international comparisons for quality of life, freedom and gender equality, with little corruption, crime and pollution.
But anti-immigrant sentiment and a reluctance to employ outsiders are also widespread in Western Europe's most homogenous society, and the opposition far-right Finns Party regularly draws substantial support during elections.
After years of inertia, businesses and government "are now at the tipping point and are recognising the problem" posed by a greying population, said Charles Mathies, a research fellow at the Academy of Finland.
Mathies is one of the experts consulted by the government's "Talent Boost" programme, now in its fourth year, which aims to make the country more attractive internationally, in part through local recruitment schemes.
Those targeted include health workers from Spain, metalworkers from Slovakia, and IT and maritime experts from Russia, India and Southeast Asia.
But previous such efforts have petered out.
In 2013, five of the eight Spanish nurses recruited to the western town of Vaasa left after a few months, citing Finland's exorbitant prices, cold weather and notoriously complex language.
Finland has nonetheless seen net immigration for much of the last decade, with around 15,000 more people arriving than leaving in 2019.
But many of those quitting the country are higher-educated people, official statistics show.
Faced with the OECD's largest skilled worker shortage, some Finnish startups are creating a joint careers site to better bag overseas talent.
"As you can imagine, this is a slow burner," Shaun Rudden from food delivery firm Wolt said in an email, adding that "We try to make the relocation process as painless as possible."
Startups "have told me that they can get anyone in the world to come and work for them in Helsinki, as long as he or she is single," the capital's mayor, Jan Vapaavuori, said to AFP.
But "their spouses still have huge problems getting a decent job."
Many foreigners complain of a widespread reluctance to recognise overseas experience or qualifications, as well as prejudice against non-Finnish applicants.
Ahmed (who requested his name be changed for professional reasons) is a 42-year-old Brit with many years' experience in building digital products for multinational, household-name companies.
Yet six months of networking and applying for jobs in Helsinki, where he was trying to move for family reasons, proved fruitless.
"One recruiter even refused to shake my hand, that was a standout moment," he told AFP.
"There was never a shortage of jobs going, just a shortage of mindset," said Ahmed, who during his search in Finland received offers from major companies in Norway, Qatar, the UK and Germany, and eventually began commuting weekly from Helsinki to Dusseldorf.
Recruiter Saku Tihverainen said shortages are pushing more companies to loosen their insistence on only employing native Finnish workers.
"And yet, a lot of the Finnish companies and organisations are very adamant about using Finnish, and very fluent Finnish at that," he said.
For Helsinki mayor Jan Vaaavuori, four years of Finland being voted the world's happiest country in a UN ranking have "not yet helped as much as we could have hoped."
"If you stop someone in the street in Paris or London or Rome or New York, I still don't think most people know about us," he mused.
Mayor Vapaavuori, whose four-year term ends this summer, has turned increasingly to international PR firms to help raise the city's profile.
He is optimistic about Finland's ability to attract talent from Asia in future, and believes people's priorities will have changed once international mobility ramps up again post-coronavirus.
Helsinki's strengths, being "safe, functional, reliable, predictable -- those values have gained in importance," he said, adding: "Actually I think our position after the pandemic is better than it was before." -- AFP
Monday, 21 June 2021
The Real Reason for Illegal Immigration
Thursday, 13 May 2021
Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj. Ahmad with Datuk Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj. Ahmad
Despite having exactly the same name and engineering title, I am no on speaking term with the datuk.
Tuesday, 20 April 2021
Criticism of Malaysia's EV roadmap
Thursday, 4 March 2021
Finance only Projects that have granted WIPO-class Inventions
To,
1. Datuk Khairy Jamaluddin, Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation
2. Any other concerned people
Subj: Finance only Projects that have granted WIPO-class Inventions
To all those who are concerned about the progress of Malaysia in these troubling times, it should be obvious that we need to save money on research and development expenditures that are 3 times less effective than Finland.
Intellectual Property is Wealth
If we continue our ways, we will get reduced innovation and therefore reduced wealth, because Intellectual Property is wealth, recognized by all the accounting bodies of the world. What we are mostly concerned is the wealth generated by innovations, not the subjective improvements such as increase in knowledge that may lead to real wealth for others. We need the wealth for ourselves, not for other richer people like those in Finland.
MYIPO does not want to grant patents to locals
How do we get the Intellectual Property? It is by getting our patents granted, not just by filing them. Unfortunately, MYIPO does not want to grant patents with moronic excuses.
There are only three levels of intellectual measurement. Clever, Stupid or Moronic. A moron is so stupid that he cannot distinguish between 2 and 1. Soft and hard. This is what has happened to MYIPO patent examiners, no doubt influenced by other patent examiners in some nations that are so corrupted. I am the evidence of this. I have even reported to the Auditor General but unfortunately the auditor sees nothing wrong with these sorts of moronic judgements and the time taken to make decisions.
MYIPO took 5 years to find that my invention with only one shaft is similar to other inventions that have two shafts. Incidentally, these inventions were discovered by me in the patent filings because they are the closest to my inventions. If it took them 5 years to discover these moronic excuses it will take them another 5 years at least to find other excuses.
A patent only lasts for 20 years. It only has value for 20 years, so after 20 years, it will become useless. My invention is called Optimum Hybrid Vehicles. It allows all types of vehicles to be converted to an electrical hybrid car that is optimum. It is optimum because it gets all the savings of electric vehicles possible while using the least cost. Imagine the reduction in global warming if we can convert all vehicles into electrical hybrid vehicles? My invention will have no value once no more fuel burning vehicles are used, which can happen in the next 10 years.
If you read the comments in the article referred to, the reason why only 15% patents granted are local, is that MYIPO does not want to grant patents to locals. I bet, some of the locals also have patents granted overseas. I have a patent called Zero Energy Transportation System that is already granted by UKIPO but abandoned by MYIPO, the only patent that I filed that had been granted. I had filed 6 patents, none had been proven to be invalid, with many deemed as abandoned. This is the typical moronic excuses by patent examiners and offices that inventors want to abandon their patent filing process.
WIPO filing has better success rate
The reason why that Zero Energy Transportation System patent is granted is because it was filed in WIPO, the only patent that I filed using WIPO. I thought I can save money by just filing nationally separately but it turned out to be a bad judgement.
Why a WIPO filing has a much better success rate than national patent filings? Because you can get the advantage of a second opinion from patent examiners from other nations, especially those from competing interests. I filed in WIPO using Japanese Patent Office as the preliminary search agent. My JPO patent examiner is the most professional among all patent examiners that I have come across. Japan is known as the least corrupt nation on earth and this shows. All the moronic reasonings of patent examiners are caused by corruption.
Tax money to be spent on WIPO filings only
I suggest that all research fund must be towards generating granted patents, not just filing patents that take forever to be granted. Because WIPO has a better chance of success in granting patents, the tax money is best spent by filing in WIPO only, and at least 3 other large nations, that will make the WIPO filing justifiable. I suggest US, UK and Malaysia, at least. Certainly not Australia or even Finland.
The excuse given by MYIPO in not granting locals the patents, is that they do not have enough patent examiners. If they are not enough, why should we file even more patents to them? Ridiculous isn’t it. But this is what we are doing now. We asked our researchers to file in Malaysia only so that these IP do not have enough value. To be valuable, it needs to be useable in as many countries as possible.
I need to spend a total of RM5,000 for each filing. Filing through agents will cost RM10,000 at least, but there are cost saving measures that we can take but these measures will have impacts in other areas also. Asking researchers to do their own filing will reduce their time doing the research. I filed myself but my research output should therefore be less as a result of spending time preparing and defending my patents. However, some of the work are actually similar to the work done by researchers such as literature review and publications. We just need to change formats.
Patent filing costs must be paid by funding bodies
The biggest problem faced by universities in Malaysia is that patent filing is not supported by the funding bodies, but the patent outputs are to be shared. This is unfair. If we go to court, the patent rights distribution can be disputed. If a person is not concerned enough to give money to file and support the patents until they are approved, why should they be entitled to the patents anyway?
It is like asking a person to open a screw but does not provide a screw driver. You may ask the person to provide his own screw driver but that costs incurred by the person, means that the effort in producing the work results in some of the output belonging to him also. Just because many people willingly give their properties to their employers does not mean that it is right, because it is not sustainable. It is like asking workers to pay for themselves for the benefits of employers.
Declining revenue means declining research grant amount. A lot of the research amount is spent on post graduate students in order to produce as many post graduates as possible.
Supporting students that can produce world class inventions only
Reducing the amount of money for students and diverting them to filing patents will look like a reduction in the quantity of graduates but the reduction in the number of graduates will be compensated by the greater value of these graduates. They are able to produce world class inventions. Why should we support graduates that are not able to produce world class inventions at this time of troubled economy?
No more prototypes, only custom production
Another strange phenomenon in the academic world is the large number of prototypes that they produce. These prototypes do not do any useful work, even for a short while which results in them not giving any value at all. This is the result of requiring perfection in order to make any decision.
In my work as a project manager, we do not call our outputs prototypes. We call them custom production. Each of the product is different from the others because we need to make changes to them to suit the environments required by customers. There are always errors or imperfections, called variation orders. Usually, the allowed VO is just 10% but it can exceed that figure in order to finish the project.
There is no need to produce a prototype first. The least we do, we call it a pilot project because it is the first time that special design is produced, but that project must serve customers, despite it being the first one. We just need to rely on our knowledge and calculations to ensure that they are safe and function properly. That is the job of professional engineers.
You do not expect engineers to produce a protype of a KL Twin Towers in order to finally produce a safe Twin Towers do you? It will be much safer and certain, but what a waste. Why don’t we just build the KL Twin Towers based on our knowledge and expertise of past experiences, using proven methods and materials? We may need to produce a scale model of the Twin Towers to prove certain concepts and the costs is part of the development costs, but the accuracy of any scale model is not so high, so many have been replaced by simulations. Simulations also do not have 100% accuracy, but we need to decide and take some risks. Do not make perfection be the enemy of correctness. This is the comment made by one expert in the wake of the WHO disastrous handling of the COVID19.
How can researchers do custom production?
First, identify your customer or user. The customer does not need to pay any money because the research fund should cover it. But the research fund can be rephrased as a custom production of a device or system. The funder is the best customer. If it is the federal government, the output of the custom design project is to be used by the federal government. It can be treated just like any purchase of items for the federal government.
Sufficient fund must therefore be provided until the product is useable to the customer. The very common problem with Malaysian projects is that there is insufficient fund and variation orders to allow a project to be completed and fully useable. For example, there is a fund to allow the buying of a car, but not enough to buy tyres for the cars.
Custom production of Transparent SUV
To illustrate the process of a custom production of a research project, let me explain the steps that I shall take to commercialise this invention.
The Transparent SUV will be patented using the Patent Design in USA, and Industrial Design in Malaysia and UK. We can protect the shape of this invention. I am still waiting for UMS on how much they are willing to fund and if not, release their rights. So far, I still have not received their response and this has delayed the production of this vehicle.
Because the production of this vehicle is vital for the environment and therefore of public interest, I shall give UMS reasonable time to respond of not more than 1 month. If they still do not respond, I shall assume that they are not willing to fund this patent filing and therefore release their rights to the design. Actually, it is already more than 1 month. I already informed them in various emails and forms since November 2020, but so far, no reply at all.
Before the design patent is granted, I do not intend to proceed with any development of this design. It is a waste of time and fund to do so. Just wait until it is granted. The secret of the success of this project is the exact shape of this SUV. It allows a very low Coefficient of Aerodynamic Drag, even lower than tear drop designs. The exact shape is covered under the Trade Secret. You cannot patent the exact shape anyway, because it is not a method and the precise shape is functional. Design patent is not allowed for functional objects.
The Sabah Economic Advisory Council is anxious that I build this Transparent SUV. This is where I realised the silliness of calling it a protype project. Although this design is optimised for mass production because of its shape and plastic materials, rather than build a prototype, I shall only build a custom design tailored for a customer first.
How can we? It is even illegal to drive it on public roads. So, just drive in estates and private properties. Instead of the State Government wasting money funding a research project, why not just order one car for its use? It will be a publicity statement and at the same time, serves a function. One member suggested that we use it to transport security officers. Other suggestions, coming from the council and the Sabah Blueprint NGO is for agricultural uses. These ideas do not come from me, but from others.
No such thing as invalid patent
One possible accusation against patents is that they are not valid but a patent is not valid until the highest court in all countries deemed it as invalid. Before these decisions are made, you cannot say that any patent is invalid. Patent Offices and patent examiners do not have the final say on the granting of a patent.
So, all patents can be granted finally if support is given. The cost can be as high as one million RM in each nation.
So, to make it viable, the value of the invention must exceed this amount. The value also increases as it passes more challenges. If it has to go to the highest courts, it’s value will be even higher.
I do not recall any case where the highest courts invalidate a patent. The only relevant decisions are whether a particular process violates a granted patent or not. The reasons why this is not is because the coverage of the patent is not wide enough. If the coverage is not wide enough, it will reduce the value of your patent. Which is why you should defend the coverage of your claims. Patent examiners will dispute mostly these claims but it is important not to submit to them. I doubt agents are capable of determining the scope of an invention. We need the inventors themselves to determine these limits. The more knowledgeable the inventor is, the wider these claims are.
Defending against patent examiners
Please note that a patent cannot be rejected based on scope of claims alone simply because they can always be amended. What cannot be amended are the obvious claims.
Unfortunately, many patent examiners dispute the scope of claims and interpret them so widely that it led to the moronic interpretations that two shafts are the same as one shaft, hard shell is the same as soft shell and cooling system is the same as efficiency system.
The reasons which they quote is that they interpret widely, but I never understand how widely it is because they refused to explain their reasons. Even when I start amending, trying to decipher their intentions, they are still not satisfied.
There are many attempts at invalidating my patents by using illegal methods in the USPTO and even UKIPO by using abandonment because I do not reply on time. The reasons are due to the non-receipt of their communications. Their illogical reasonings were recorded and forwarded to the Patent Appeal processes and were overturned. Even here, the patent examiner ignored the order to reinstate the patent. I had to resort to the Department of Commerce to force USTPO to honour the decision of the Patent Appeal Court.
Later on, I found out that there was a patent awarded to Boeing, that is a blatant copy of my invention, but immediately granted. This is just blatant corruption, so do not exclude the possibilities that patent examiners are corrupt. The invention, Zero Energy Transportation Systems is already granted by UKIPO, by using these incidences in USPTO and JPO. I am sure they helped me in getting the grant. The fact that it is was filed through WIPO helps also.
Another invention, the Zero Aerodynamic Drag Vehicles suffered similar fate. It was rejected and I was not allowed to file any amendments because my claims are still indefinite and non-obvious because it is similar to cooling system patents. Despite my attempts at explaining how moronic these interpretations are, the examiners, based it on his widest claim, which I still could not decipher and therefore amend according to his desires.
This time the PTAB sided with the examiner which unfortunately affirmed the overall rejection of the whole patent despite not find that the invention not obvious. This is illegal because you cannot reject a patent based on indefinite interpretations alone because they can be amended. She quoted the following:
re Steele, 305 F.2d 859, 862-63 (CCPA 1962) (holding that the Board erred in affirming a rejection of indefinite claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, because the rejection was based on speculative assumptions as to the meaning of the claims).
This implies that we should consider obviousness search by assuming that there are no indefinite claims. If you assume the claims are indefinite, then you cannot claim that the invention is obvious. This is a very old case and not mentioned in any of the MPEP and MPOP of USPTO and UKIPO.
The moment you passed the obviousness claim, we can start amending to satisfy the indefinite cases but defend to the best of your ability, and keep in mind all the records. If later on, someone circumvent your patents because of the more restrictive interpretations forced on you by the examiners, you can claim damages against the patent offices and patent examiners.
Instead of taking USPTO to court, it is better to report all these evidences to the Department of Justice of the USA first. Their investigations should help our case.
Disclaimer:
This article is written as my own idea and proposal as a concerned citizen of Malaysia and has no endorsement from my employer, Universiti Malaysia Sabah.
Written by:
Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj. Ahmad, PEng ASDK
Faculty of Engineering,
Universiti Malaysia Sabah
4/3/2021