Saturday, 14 March 2020

Maths of Sporadic Infections

A staff at Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah mosque in Shah Alam, squeezes out hand sanitiser on to a palm of a person, amid the Covid-19 coronavirus outbreak. - BERNAMA pic
KUALA LUMPUR: Medical experts are urging for faster and urgent action in handling the Covid-19 outbreak in the country.
This follows the World Health Organisation’s declaration of the disease as a pandemic on Wednesday, and the tabligh gathering at the Seri Petaling Mosque here recently, which sparked a new cluster transmission of Covid-19 in the country.
Dr Ong Hean Teik, past chairman of the Penang branch of the Malaysian Medical Association, said the situation in Malaysia was severe and this warranted stricter measures.
This, he said, included banning mass gatherings, postponing weddings and events, as well as closing down schools temporarily in high-risk areas.
“The virus is present in the community. We not only have cluster cases (sparked by Cases 26 and 131), but we have also entered the community transmission stage, which calls for the authorities to boost its emergency response mechanism.
“Issuing an advisory is not enough. The Health Ministry should be clear in conveying the seriousness of the outbreak.
“Malaysia was successful in containing the spread during the first wave. Case 26 changed this. Since Cases 26 and 131 contracted the virus in Malaysia, isn’t it enough to indicate community spread?
“People need to be informed to contain the virus.”
Dr Ong, a consultant cardiologist and past president of Penang Medical Practitioners’ Society, said medical practitioners, including head of departments at public hospitals, had raised concern about the shortage of Covid-19 test kits.
This, he said, was causing a backlog in case detection, especially following the tabligh gathering where thousands of people were scrambling to get tested.
He questioned if the ministry had adequate resources in place if the outbreak worsened.
People wearing face masks at Kuala Lumpur International Airport in Sepang yesterday. -BERNAMA pic
“WHO’s data suggests that 80 per cent of Covid-19 infections are mild or asymptomatic, 15 per cent are severe infections requiring oxygen and five per cent are critical infections requiring ventilation.
“How many ventilators and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation machines do we have for those with respiratory failures? Do we have sufficient protective gear for medical personnel?”
Former Malaysian Medical Association president Datuk Dr N.K.S. Tharmaseelan agreed that Malaysia had entered the community transmission stage. He advised the public to take extra precautions.
Malaysian Public Health Medicine Specialist Association president Datuk Dr Zainal Ariffin Omar said the Health Ministry should make public the list of places that Covid-19 patients had visited, worked at or areas they lived in.
This, he said, was so that the public could practise social distancing.
Paediatrician Datuk Dr Musa Mohd Nordin said the asymptomatic transmission of Covid-19 made total containment difficult and problematic.
He said there might be a need to realign and reconsider some of the Health Ministry’s strategies of containment and mitigation.
“I do not think we need to follow the lockdown methodology of China and Italy. South Korea has been successful in reducing the number of confirmed cases of Covid-19 from 900 per day to fewer than 100 per day.
“We can learn from South Korea’s strategy. We must ensure that there are sufficient diagnostic test kits.
“South Korea undertakes 12,000 to 20,000 tests per day.
“To facilitate testing, South Korea has set up drive-through Covid-19 test centres. This drive-through model has been replicated by KPJ Damansara Specialist Hospital (KPJ-DSH) and Sungai Buloh Hospital.
“KPJ-DSH has operated drive-through test centres at the premises of government-linked companies to test those who had close contact with Case 26.”
Dr Musa said it was crucial to be transparent in information sharing because access to accurate information could debunk fake news and fearmongering.
“It empowers the people to be active partners of the Health Ministry and the government in the fight against the outbreak.”

Saturday, 22 February 2020

Anwar sokong perkahwinan homosexual?

Datu Dr. Hassan Ali ini pula berkata:
"Hassan berkata maksud sokongan itu perlu dibaca secara keseluruhan
dan bukannya memilih ayat-ayat
tertentu."

Yang sedihnya, dia sendiri memilih perkataan perkataan tertentu untuk
memberi maksud penulis asal.
"the sanctity of marriage between men and women", bererti kemuliaan
perkahwinan.

Kemudian:
"Surendran: Dalam ayat ketiga "We need to review them. We do not
promote homosexuality in public sphere and domain". Adakah ayat itu
menunjukkan Anwar menyokong homoseksual?

Hasan: Ya"

Dengan perkataan ini pun, bererti Anwar sokong perkahwinan
homosexual???
Ada perkataan SOKONG disitu? Perkataan tidak sokong berkali kali
dinyatakan oleh Anwar, dan perkataan SOKONG homosexual langsung tidak
ada, namun Dr. Hassan ini pula membuat kesimpulan bahawa Anwar sokong
perkahwian homosexual. Bukan fitnah kah ini? Cuma orang bodoh UMNO
sahaja percaya bahawa ini bererti Anwar sokong perkahwinan homosexual.

Mungkin bukan perkahwinan tetapi homosexual, seperti yang menuduh
Anwar beberapa kali dengan saksi saksi yang telah pun mengaku
berbohong DIDALAM MAHKAMAH ITU SENDIRI! Namun tuduhan pertama bukan
pengakuan berbohong yang diterima! Hakim apa itu!
Saiful(28 tahun) pula mengaku diROGOL oleh Anwar(65 tahun), tetapi
menunggu berminggu minggu untuk melapurkan kes rogol ini, dan setelah
berjumpa dengan Najib dan beberapa lagi pegawai polis lain, sebelum
membuat lapuran resmi. Lepas itu pula, lapuran doktor pertama tidak
pula diterima.
Undang undang apa ini?

"Semasa pemeriksaan semula oleh peguam Datuk Firoz Hussein Ahmad
Jamaluddin yang mewakili Utusan Malaysia, bahawa perkataan 'review
archaic laws', 'punitive', 'punishment not relevant' dan 'public
spehere and domain' membawa maksud kegiatan homoseksual boleh
dihalalkan, Hasan berkata pada bacaannya ia bermaksud menghalalkan
kegiatan homoseksual"

Jika kamu telah berhadapan dengan hakim hakim Malaysia yang
menggunakan hukum civil untuk menuduh Anwar melakukan aktiviti
homoseksual, kamu patut fahamlah erti "arcaic laws", "punitive",
"punishment not relevan", "public sphere and domain".

Hukum civil, bukan hukum Islam. Anwar mahu dibicarakan didalam hukur
Islam tetapi ditolak oleh hakim BN ini, padahal jelas sekali didalam
perlembagaan bahawa orang Islam perlu dibicarakan oleh hukum Islam.

Hukum Islam memerlukan 4 orang saksi yang betul betul nampak. Kalau
tidak, ia akan dianggap sebagai FITNAH.
Nah, memang jelas sekali UMNO sudah bersalah membuat FITNAH sebab
tidak cukup saksi. Apa lagi mahu fikir panjang panjang. Dari segi
hukum syarak, UMNO sudah bersalah. Tidak perlu hakim menentukan lagi.
Kita semua boleh gunakan otak kita, dan hukum semua hakim hakim UMNO
itu. Kalau tidak kita semua masuk neraka.

Kalau pun archai law, iaitu undang undang lapuk, ini ditujukan kepada
hukum Islam lah. Dr. Hassan kata undang undang Islam tidak pandai
lapuk. Jadi buat apa majlis fatwah? Demikian juga undang undang civil.
Ia mesti direview mengikut keadaan zaman.

Mesej Anwar sebenarnya mendalam, tetapi dia memang konsisten dari
dahulu lagi. Tahun 1980 sejak saya mula kenal dengan pendirian Anwar.
Dia seorang Islam progressif, bukan jenis PAS, terutama sekali PAS
dahulu. DiSAbah, memang sudah lama kami begini disebabkan keadaan.
Sebab itu lah kami merasa lain dengan kempen PAS.



Kes Saman Anwar : Mahkamah Diberitahu Temu Bual Di BBC Sokong
Homoseksual
Published by AIDC on August 14, 2012 | 6 Comments



AIDCNews – 14/08/12 – Bekas Pesuruhjaya PAS Selangor, Datuk Dr Hasan
Ali yang turut dipanggil menjadi saksi memberitahu Mahkamah Tinggi
semalam bahawa temu bual Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim dengan badan
penyiaran British, BBC, mengenai undang-undang berkaitan homoseksual
yang disiarkan pada 12 Jan lepas, membawa maksud supaya menyokong
kegiatan itu.

Semasa pemeriksaan balas oleh peguam N.Surendran yang mewakili Anwar,
Hassan berkata maksud sokongan itu perlu dibaca secara keseluruhan dan
bukannya memilih ayat-ayat tertentu.

Surendran: Anwar telah mengatakan "We Muslims and non-Muslims in
Malaysia generally believe and committed to support the sanctity of
marriage between men and women". Berdasarkan pendapat anda, adakah
ayat ini menunjukkan Anwar tidak menyokong homoseksual?

Hasan: Yang Arif saya membaca keseluruhan ayat. Ayat pertama dan ayat
kedua (but we should not be seen to be punitive and consider the
archaic law as relevant) tidak dapat berdiri dengan sendirinya dan ia
tidak memberi maksud homoseksual tidak diterima.

Surendran: Kalau kita lihat ayat kedua, adakah anda setuju 'archaic
law' adalah undang-undang lapuk?
Hasan: Saya tak setuju sebab kelapukan tidak pernah berlaku dalam
undang-undang Islam.

Surendran: Berdasarkan kenyataan "We Muslims and non-Muslims in
Malaysia generally believe and committed to support the sanctity of
marriage between men and women" adakah Anwar menyokong institusi
perkahwinan antara lelaki dan perempuan?

Hasan: Ya setuju.

Surendran: Dalam ayat ketiga "We need to review them. We do not
promote homosexuality in public sphere and domain". Adakah ayat itu
menunjukkan Anwar menyokong homoseksual?

Hasan: Ya

Surendran: Anda pasti dengan jawapan itu?
Hasan: Ya

Surendran: Saya cadangkan kepada anda ayat ini tidak sokong
homoseksual tapi sokong perkahwinan.

Hasan: Saya tak setuju

Hasan juga turut disoal balas oleh seorang lagi peguam Anwar, Latheefa
Koya berkenaan dengan aktiviti homoseksual di tempat persendirian
bukan merupakan satu jenayah jika dibandingkan dengan di khalayak
umum.

Hassan menjawab, dalam hukum Islam dosa tetap dianggap satu jenayah
tidak kira ia dilakukan secara sembunyi atau terang-terangan.

Latheefa:Adakah anda tahu perbezan antara dosa dengan jenayah.

Hasan: Saya tak pasti.

Latheefa: Saya cadangkan kepada anda sesuatu kegiatan yang dilakukan
dalam Islam boleh dianggap sebagai dosa tetapi sekiranya tidak
dilakukan di hadapan khalayak ramai, ia tidak boleh dijadikan sebagai
jenayah. Adakah anda setuju?

Hasan: Tidak setuju. Sama ada di tempat awam atau tertutup, kalau itu
tidak dibolehkan (berdosa), maka ia tetap tidak dibolehkan.

Hasan, saksi defendan pertama, berkata demikian pada perbicaraan kes
saman Anwar terhadap Utusan Melayu (Malaysia) Bhd dan ketua
pengarangnya Datuk Abdul Aziz Ishak berhubung artikel mengenai komen
Anwar bersama BBC mengenai undang-undang berkaitan homoseksual.

Pada 20 Januari lalu, Anwar memfailkan saman fitnah itu bagi menuntut
ganti rugi RM50 juta, atas dakwaan telah menerbitkan dua artikel di
muka hadapan dan muka surat 10 akhbar Utusan Malaysia bertarikh 17
Januari tahun ini berhubung temu bualnya bersama BBC.

Semasa pemeriksaan semula oleh peguam Datuk Firoz Hussein Ahmad
Jamaluddin yang mewakili Utusan Malaysia, bahawa perkataan 'review
archaic laws', 'punitive', 'punishment not relevant' dan 'public
spehere and domain' membawa maksud kegiatan homoseksual boleh
dihalalkan, Hasan berkata pada bacaannya ia bermaksud menghalalkan
kegiatan homoseksual.

Perbicaraan bersambung 23 Oktober ini.

Wednesday, 19 February 2020

Rahmah implementation at Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS)

Our latest website clearly states that our vision at Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS) is to be implement Rahmah which is to be compassionate. Although there are still hickups towards implementing this compassionate policy in view of the challenges of achieving the Key Performance Indicators (KPI) of an educational institution, I believe UMS is on the way towards achieve this.

The latest initiative is towards the implementation of the clock-in time for academic staff, i.e. lecturers. Lecturers and teachers are well known to have the highest burden in any profession because they need to work a lot of extra time after office hours, marking papers and do other activities such as extra-curricular and in universities, research and consultation. It is therefore unfair to subject teachers to a strict interval of time every day.

Labour law and common law allows time off or overtime pay for work outside the agreed working time or duration. If the extra work are not well defined, and therefore difficult to quantify, applying for these time-off or overtime pay is very cumbersome. The application process itself creates more work burden that it will be troublesome to apply for them everytime it occurs.

From 17 Feb, academic staff are no longer to clock out, only clock in before 12pm. Today I utilised it by clocking in at 10am. I had to go to TM Point Sadong Jaya to enquire about my Unifi and Tabung Haji accounts on my way to UMS. I departed slightly later than 8 and there is light traffic. Even at Sadong Jaya, it was quiet.

Someone will say that this is for personal matters, so should take leave, but having a good internet connection at home is vital for us to continue working at home. In fact, my internet at home is faster than my office internet. Even my PCs and laptops at home is faster than in my office. Tabung haji is to settle our financial affairs which is important to our well being.

Before this, I need to go to UMS and then later on, go back to Sadong Jaya to settle affairs. It will consume a lot of time. It is demoralising and reduces our productivity.

This flexible clocking in is also vital for UMS to attract professionals who would like to contribute to society by sharing their expertise with students at UMS. They may not be interested in monetary rewards or not, but are unlikely to agree if they are not respected and pressurised to contribute in areas that they are not interested.

So, professionals in Kota Kinablu. Anyone interested in contributing your experiences with students at UMS? It will also sharpen your mind.

Wednesday, 8 January 2020

Should Only Leaders be Killed in Disputes?

The recent killing of Qasim Sulaiman, a general in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, who is responsible for issuing orderst to kill many innocent citizens in Syria and also soldiers in all places in the Middle East, is a new idea of modern warfare.

At first, it may appear as barbaric but what is more barbaric compared to the sufferings that soldiers and civilians need to endure as a result of the wars that are being carried out. How could we value the lives of leaders who issue the orders to kill or make others suffer, be much more than ordinary person, sometimes millions more.

Why can't all disputes be settled by killing the leaders only? At least they know the consequence of their actions. The Japanese emperor surrendered because he knows that he will be the target sooner or later. Unfortunately civilians at Hiroshima and Nagasaki had to suffer first.

It is so strange that even in games, such as Chess, the moment a leader is dead, the game is over. And yet in real life it is frowned upon. This hypocricy is due to the lies spread by leaders to protect themselves while killing their followers and followers of their enemies. After all the slaughter, the leaders will then shake hands again, as though all lives lost were nothing.

If these leaders know that their lives are at stake, I am sure they will hesitate to lauch wars. Now, how about Iran Leader, Ali Hosseini Khamenei, who as Supreme Leader, Khamenei is the head of state of Iran and the commander-in-chief of its armed forces. Should US target him? Why not? At least his life will be miserable hiding from US weapons. He should know the consequences of decisions made by him. Similarly for Donal Trump and Kim Jong Un.

Would's the world be safer and less lives lost as a result of conflicts between leaders. If the conflicts are between people, it will be harder but this is a rare case. Rwanda genocide could be one of them. Or probably because we do not know the actual leaders for the genocide. They should be idenfied.

The roles of the ICJ and other justice offices in the UN should be to identify the perpetrators to war crimes and make them pay for them. It is not enough to arrest only leaders that are depose, they should issue arrest warrant or even dead or alive orders to sitting leaders.

As who should carry out the orders, let their enemies justify their actions. This applies to Netanyahu and his supporters who allowed the Jewish settlers to roam at will on Palestinian land.

Monday, 6 January 2020

Twitter rules for abusive behaviour

https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/abusive-behavior

I was subjected to censorship for pointing out the facts that a lot of the problems in this world can be solved by killing murderers.

It is just a fact of life. Removing this option will not make this world a peaceful place. Twitter may not agree with this view, but the option should be open to all. Let people wake up to reality.

Wishing harm towards dead people should be exempted. After all, they were already dead. People like Hitler, Sadam, Gadafi and Qasim.

Wishing proper punishment for people with verified crimes such as gassing his own citizens, such as Assad should be allowed also. Futhermore, how can we harrass a person like Assad and Putin? How can anyone just incite the US government to harrass people like Assad and Putin? Just ridiculous.

Sunday, 5 January 2020

Importance of PISA score

PISA score indicates the academic quality of 15 year olds. It is not surprising that developed nations have higher scores.

It is not proven why this is so.
How actually better scores in Science impacts the development of a nation. They can become bette
r workers at the least cost.

However, the best students will leave to places that give the best benefits.

Loot at South African Elon Musk. Indians Satalya and Pichai.
Even Broadcom is owned by a Malaysian. But now in USA.



Friday, 3 January 2020

Journal Retraction Rate by Country



No photo description available.



 https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/what-massive-database-retracted-papers-reveals-about-science-publishing-s-death-penalty

Singapore is among the highest, probably due to its forced ranking stupid dumb bell shaped performance criteria. An award ranking method by Fortune which were used by Enron which led to its collapse due to fraud.

When you set impossible KPI, key performance criteria, people will still achieve them but by cheating. Everybody knows about it except the guy asking for it. Probably he knows about it, but pretend not to know so that he can publicise the false data to promote himself.