Pelik juga. UMNO mahu Anwar bawa Mercedesnya masuk FELDA. Macamlah
jalan disana boleh menampung kereta besar macam Mercedes. Seolah olah
seorang pembangkang tidak boleh membawa kereta mewah. Saya juga hairan
bahawa ramai penyokong UMNO tidak tahu bahawa Anwar sewaktu pelajar
lagi memang sudah kaya. Bapa dia pada tahun 1970han adalah seorang MP
UMNO.
"Menurut seorang rakan di dalam PKR; Anwar terpaksa 'menangis, merayu
dan memujuk' sebelum mampu bertemu dengan ulama' besar itu. Yusof
Qaradawi katanya TIDAK MAHU berjumpa Anwar kerana statement-nya
menyokong Israel."
Tetapi pada hakikatnya, Qardawi berjumpa juga dengan Anwar, bukan.
Macamlah Qardawi ini budak budakan yang boleh dipujuk dengan tangisan.
BAhlul betul orang UMNO ini. Inilah ashik dengan fitnah, perkara bodoh
pun tidak dapat dilihat.
Tajuk artikle ini pula mengatakan bahawa Anwar menggelabah tentang isu
Palestin, tetapi fakta yang ditunjukkan pula mengatakan bahawa Qardawi
BERJUMPA DENGAN ANWAR.
Saya sendiri tidak tahu Qardawi berjumpa dengan Anwar tetapi pos ini
yang bagi tahu aku. Namun, rumusan dan tajuk langsung tidak masuk
akal. Lain fakta, lain pula rumusan. Apa lagi tajuk.
Apa yang UMNO sokong? Satu negeri sahaja di Palestin atau 2 negeri,
Palestin dan Israel? Anwar sokong 2 negeri sebab sekarang baru ada 1
negeri, iaitu Israel. UMNO mahu palestin ujud tanpa negerikah? Atau
mahu menghapuskan Israel dengan kekuatan tentera. Kalau UMNO ashik
mengapu USA dan Israel, bagaimana mahu Israel hapus. Bererti orang
UMNO ini TIDAK MAHU ADA PALESTIN UJUDLAH!!!!
Jahanam betul UMNO ini. Kejam betul terhadap rakyat Palestin yang
ditindas. Sanggup menidakkan kenegaraan Palestin, gara gara mahu
memfitnah Anwar.
http://www.anwaraidc.com/?p=22011
Isu Israel Buat Anwar Mengelabah..
Published by AIDC on February 21, 2012 | 41 Comments
GA – Ramai juga rakan-rakan aktivis lama reformasi yang mengikut
kunjungan DSAI ke kawasan Pekan kelmarin. Bukan sangat nak sokong
Anwar; tetapi nak tengok persediaan UMNO Pekan untuk mempertahan
kawasan daripada kemasukan Anwar.
Anwar pun bijak. Dia tinggal Mercedez kat stesen minyak; lepas tu naik
kapchai sama-sama dengan budak muda masuk ke FELDA. Orang pun tak
berapa perasan. Tiba-tiba Anwar dah sampai.
Bukan main juga orang FELDA puji Anwar. Jiwa rakyat. Sanggup bersusah
dengan rakyat. Sanggup naik motor masuk ke FELDA. Dia orang seronok.
Tapi, di kalangan aktivis reformasi perasan – Anwar tak macam biasa.
Fikiran Anwar nampak celaru. Habis semua gambar, buku yang Anwar
tunjuk konon dia masih diterima sebagai pemimpin Islam di dunia Arab.
Kita kena sama-sama baca tulisan Zabidi Yusoff dalam Malaysiakini:-
Oleh Zabidi Yusoff
Semasa saya menulis ini, Datuk Seri Anwar dan isteri sedang menjadi
tetamu kepada dua pemimpin Islam tersohor di dunia, Sheikh Yusuf Al-
Qardawi dan juga Khalid Mish'al di Doha, Qatar.
Sheikh Yusuf adalah ulamak terkemuka dan juga ulamak buat Ihwanul
Muslimin. Khalid Mish'al pula adalah pejuang dan pemimpin Hamas,
organisasi yang memerintah Gaza dan dilabel kontroversi kerana dicop
organisasi teroris olih Amerika dan Israel.
Tetapi, dengan taktik yang baru, di mana Khalid telah mula berlembut
dengan bersetuju akan 'resolusi 2 negara' (2 state solution), maka
kebarangkali usaha untuk mendapatkan keamanan di rantau itu adalah
amat besar.
Dalam tempoh seminggu sahaja, Anwar telah pun menemui pemimpin-
pemimpin dunia Islam dalam rangka mengiratkan persaudaraan seperti
Perdana Menter Recep Tayyip Erdogan dan kabinet beliau, Ketua Bank
Pembangunan Islam, Dr Ahmad Muhammad Ali, pendokong tegar Palestin,
Sheikh Abdul Qadir,warga negara Saudi, Imam Masjid di Mekah, pemimpin
masyarakat Islam setempat, Sheikh Kabbali, A Gafur Amin, Dr Umar
Jamjum dari Universiti King Abdul Aziz, Dr Abdul Hamid Sulayman,
Ulamak Sheikh Ahmad Muhammad Alawi Maliki, dan juga Secretary General
OIC, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu.
Kita minta Zabidi perjelaskan, bahawa Syeikh Yusof al-Qaradawi pada
hakikatnya TIDAK MAHU berjumpa Anwar; tetapi Anwar terpaksa
menggunakan cara yang lebih memalukan dalam mendapatkan masa Syeikh
Yusof.
Menurut seorang rakan di dalam PKR; Anwar terpaksa 'menangis, merayu
dan memujuk' sebelum mampu bertemu dengan ulama' besar itu. Yusof
Qaradawi katanya TIDAK MAHU berjumpa Anwar kerana statement-nya
menyokong Israel.
Apakah benar kenyataan itu? Boleh kita minta Zabidi Yusoff berikan
cerita sebenar…
Sunday, 26 August 2012
Fwd: Anwar sokong perkahwinan homosexual?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj. Ahmad" <othm...@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 26, 2:10 pm
Subject: Anwar sokong perkahwinan homosexual?
To: soc.culture.malaysia
Datu Dr. Hassan Ali ini pula berkata:
"Hassan berkata maksud sokongan itu perlu dibaca secara keseluruhan
dan bukannya memilih ayat-ayat
tertentu."
Yang sedihnya, dia sendiri memilih perkataan perkataan tertentu untuk
memberi maksud penulis asal.
"the sanctity of marriage between men and women", bererti kemuliaan
perkahwinan.
Kemudian:
"Surendran: Dalam ayat ketiga "We need to review them. We do not
promote homosexuality in public sphere and domain". Adakah ayat itu
menunjukkan Anwar menyokong homoseksual?
Hasan: Ya"
Dengan perkataan ini pun, bererti Anwar sokong perkahwinan
homosexual???
Ada perkataan SOKONG disitu? Perkataan tidak sokong berkali kali
dinyatakan oleh Anwar, dan perkataan SOKONG homosexual langsung tidak
ada, namun Dr. Hassan ini pula membuat kesimpulan bahawa Anwar sokong
perkahwian homosexual. Bukan fitnah kah ini? Cuma orang bodoh UMNO
sahaja percaya bahawa ini bererti Anwar sokong perkahwinan homosexual.
Mungkin bukan perkahwinan tetapi homosexual, seperti yang menuduh
Anwar beberapa kali dengan saksi saksi yang telah pun mengaku
berbohong DIDALAM MAHKAMAH ITU SENDIRI! Namun tuduhan pertama bukan
pengakuan berbohong yang diterima! Hakim apa itu!
Saiful(28 tahun) pula mengaku diROGOL oleh Anwar(65 tahun), tetapi
menunggu berminggu minggu untuk melapurkan kes rogol ini, dan setelah
berjumpa dengan Najib dan beberapa lagi pegawai polis lain, sebelum
membuat lapuran resmi. Lepas itu pula, lapuran doktor pertama tidak
pula diterima.
Undang undang apa ini?
"Semasa pemeriksaan semula oleh peguam Datuk Firoz Hussein Ahmad
Jamaluddin yang mewakili Utusan Malaysia, bahawa perkataan 'review
archaic laws', 'punitive', 'punishment not relevant' dan 'public
spehere and domain' membawa maksud kegiatan homoseksual boleh
dihalalkan, Hasan berkata pada bacaannya ia bermaksud menghalalkan
kegiatan homoseksual"
Jika kamu telah berhadapan dengan hakim hakim Malaysia yang
menggunakan hukum civil untuk menuduh Anwar melakukan aktiviti
homoseksual, kamu patut fahamlah erti "arcaic laws", "punitive",
"punishment not relevan", "public sphere and domain".
Hukum civil, bukan hukum Islam. Anwar mahu dibicarakan didalam hukur
Islam tetapi ditolak oleh hakim BN ini, padahal jelas sekali didalam
perlembagaan bahawa orang Islam perlu dibicarakan oleh hukum Islam.
Hukum Islam memerlukan 4 orang saksi yang betul betul nampak. Kalau
tidak, ia akan dianggap sebagai FITNAH.
Nah, memang jelas sekali UMNO sudah bersalah membuat FITNAH sebab
tidak cukup saksi. Apa lagi mahu fikir panjang panjang. Dari segi
hukum syarak, UMNO sudah bersalah. Tidak perlu hakim menentukan lagi.
Kita semua boleh gunakan otak kita, dan hukum semua hakim hakim UMNO
itu. Kalau tidak kita semua masuk neraka.
Kalau pun archai law, iaitu undang undang lapuk, ini ditujukan kepada
hukum Islam lah. Dr. Hassan kata undang undang Islam tidak pandai
lapuk. Jadi buat apa majlis fatwah? Demikian juga undang undang civil.
Ia mesti direview mengikut keadaan zaman.
Mesej Anwar sebenarnya mendalam, tetapi dia memang konsisten dari
dahulu lagi. Tahun 1980 sejak saya mula kenal dengan pendirian Anwar.
Dia seorang Islam progressif, bukan jenis PAS, terutama sekali PAS
dahulu. DiSAbah, memang sudah lama kami begini disebabkan keadaan.
Sebab itu lah kami merasa lain dengan kempen PAS.
Kes Saman Anwar : Mahkamah Diberitahu Temu Bual Di BBC Sokong
Homoseksual
Published by AIDC on August 14, 2012 | 6 Comments
AIDCNews – 14/08/12 – Bekas Pesuruhjaya PAS Selangor, Datuk Dr Hasan
Ali yang turut dipanggil menjadi saksi memberitahu Mahkamah Tinggi
semalam bahawa temu bual Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim dengan badan
penyiaran British, BBC, mengenai undang-undang berkaitan homoseksual
yang disiarkan pada 12 Jan lepas, membawa maksud supaya menyokong
kegiatan itu.
Semasa pemeriksaan balas oleh peguam N.Surendran yang mewakili Anwar,
Hassan berkata maksud sokongan itu perlu dibaca secara keseluruhan dan
bukannya memilih ayat-ayat tertentu.
Surendran: Anwar telah mengatakan "We Muslims and non-Muslims in
Malaysia generally believe and committed to support the sanctity of
marriage between men and women". Berdasarkan pendapat anda, adakah
ayat ini menunjukkan Anwar tidak menyokong homoseksual?
Hasan: Yang Arif saya membaca keseluruhan ayat. Ayat pertama dan ayat
kedua (but we should not be seen to be punitive and consider the
archaic law as relevant) tidak dapat berdiri dengan sendirinya dan ia
tidak memberi maksud homoseksual tidak diterima.
Surendran: Kalau kita lihat ayat kedua, adakah anda setuju 'archaic
law' adalah undang-undang lapuk?
Hasan: Saya tak setuju sebab kelapukan tidak pernah berlaku dalam
undang-undang Islam.
Surendran: Berdasarkan kenyataan "We Muslims and non-Muslims in
Malaysia generally believe and committed to support the sanctity of
marriage between men and women" adakah Anwar menyokong institusi
perkahwinan antara lelaki dan perempuan?
Hasan: Ya setuju.
Surendran: Dalam ayat ketiga "We need to review them. We do not
promote homosexuality in public sphere and domain". Adakah ayat itu
menunjukkan Anwar menyokong homoseksual?
Hasan: Ya
Surendran: Anda pasti dengan jawapan itu?
Hasan: Ya
Surendran: Saya cadangkan kepada anda ayat ini tidak sokong
homoseksual tapi sokong perkahwinan.
Hasan: Saya tak setuju
Hasan juga turut disoal balas oleh seorang lagi peguam Anwar, Latheefa
Koya berkenaan dengan aktiviti homoseksual di tempat persendirian
bukan merupakan satu jenayah jika dibandingkan dengan di khalayak
umum.
Hassan menjawab, dalam hukum Islam dosa tetap dianggap satu jenayah
tidak kira ia dilakukan secara sembunyi atau terang-terangan.
Latheefa:Adakah anda tahu perbezan antara dosa dengan jenayah.
Hasan: Saya tak pasti.
Latheefa: Saya cadangkan kepada anda sesuatu kegiatan yang dilakukan
dalam Islam boleh dianggap sebagai dosa tetapi sekiranya tidak
dilakukan di hadapan khalayak ramai, ia tidak boleh dijadikan sebagai
jenayah. Adakah anda setuju?
Hasan: Tidak setuju. Sama ada di tempat awam atau tertutup, kalau itu
tidak dibolehkan (berdosa), maka ia tetap tidak dibolehkan.
Hasan, saksi defendan pertama, berkata demikian pada perbicaraan kes
saman Anwar terhadap Utusan Melayu (Malaysia) Bhd dan ketua
pengarangnya Datuk Abdul Aziz Ishak berhubung artikel mengenai komen
Anwar bersama BBC mengenai undang-undang berkaitan homoseksual.
Pada 20 Januari lalu, Anwar memfailkan saman fitnah itu bagi menuntut
ganti rugi RM50 juta, atas dakwaan telah menerbitkan dua artikel di
muka hadapan dan muka surat 10 akhbar Utusan Malaysia bertarikh 17
Januari tahun ini berhubung temu bualnya bersama BBC.
Semasa pemeriksaan semula oleh peguam Datuk Firoz Hussein Ahmad
Jamaluddin yang mewakili Utusan Malaysia, bahawa perkataan 'review
archaic laws', 'punitive', 'punishment not relevant' dan 'public
spehere and domain' membawa maksud kegiatan homoseksual boleh
dihalalkan, Hasan berkata pada bacaannya ia bermaksud menghalalkan
kegiatan homoseksual.
Perbicaraan bersambung 23 Oktober ini.
From: "Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj. Ahmad" <othm...@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 26, 2:10 pm
Subject: Anwar sokong perkahwinan homosexual?
To: soc.culture.malaysia
Datu Dr. Hassan Ali ini pula berkata:
"Hassan berkata maksud sokongan itu perlu dibaca secara keseluruhan
dan bukannya memilih ayat-ayat
tertentu."
Yang sedihnya, dia sendiri memilih perkataan perkataan tertentu untuk
memberi maksud penulis asal.
"the sanctity of marriage between men and women", bererti kemuliaan
perkahwinan.
Kemudian:
"Surendran: Dalam ayat ketiga "We need to review them. We do not
promote homosexuality in public sphere and domain". Adakah ayat itu
menunjukkan Anwar menyokong homoseksual?
Hasan: Ya"
Dengan perkataan ini pun, bererti Anwar sokong perkahwinan
homosexual???
Ada perkataan SOKONG disitu? Perkataan tidak sokong berkali kali
dinyatakan oleh Anwar, dan perkataan SOKONG homosexual langsung tidak
ada, namun Dr. Hassan ini pula membuat kesimpulan bahawa Anwar sokong
perkahwian homosexual. Bukan fitnah kah ini? Cuma orang bodoh UMNO
sahaja percaya bahawa ini bererti Anwar sokong perkahwinan homosexual.
Mungkin bukan perkahwinan tetapi homosexual, seperti yang menuduh
Anwar beberapa kali dengan saksi saksi yang telah pun mengaku
berbohong DIDALAM MAHKAMAH ITU SENDIRI! Namun tuduhan pertama bukan
pengakuan berbohong yang diterima! Hakim apa itu!
Saiful(28 tahun) pula mengaku diROGOL oleh Anwar(65 tahun), tetapi
menunggu berminggu minggu untuk melapurkan kes rogol ini, dan setelah
berjumpa dengan Najib dan beberapa lagi pegawai polis lain, sebelum
membuat lapuran resmi. Lepas itu pula, lapuran doktor pertama tidak
pula diterima.
Undang undang apa ini?
"Semasa pemeriksaan semula oleh peguam Datuk Firoz Hussein Ahmad
Jamaluddin yang mewakili Utusan Malaysia, bahawa perkataan 'review
archaic laws', 'punitive', 'punishment not relevant' dan 'public
spehere and domain' membawa maksud kegiatan homoseksual boleh
dihalalkan, Hasan berkata pada bacaannya ia bermaksud menghalalkan
kegiatan homoseksual"
Jika kamu telah berhadapan dengan hakim hakim Malaysia yang
menggunakan hukum civil untuk menuduh Anwar melakukan aktiviti
homoseksual, kamu patut fahamlah erti "arcaic laws", "punitive",
"punishment not relevan", "public sphere and domain".
Hukum civil, bukan hukum Islam. Anwar mahu dibicarakan didalam hukur
Islam tetapi ditolak oleh hakim BN ini, padahal jelas sekali didalam
perlembagaan bahawa orang Islam perlu dibicarakan oleh hukum Islam.
Hukum Islam memerlukan 4 orang saksi yang betul betul nampak. Kalau
tidak, ia akan dianggap sebagai FITNAH.
Nah, memang jelas sekali UMNO sudah bersalah membuat FITNAH sebab
tidak cukup saksi. Apa lagi mahu fikir panjang panjang. Dari segi
hukum syarak, UMNO sudah bersalah. Tidak perlu hakim menentukan lagi.
Kita semua boleh gunakan otak kita, dan hukum semua hakim hakim UMNO
itu. Kalau tidak kita semua masuk neraka.
Kalau pun archai law, iaitu undang undang lapuk, ini ditujukan kepada
hukum Islam lah. Dr. Hassan kata undang undang Islam tidak pandai
lapuk. Jadi buat apa majlis fatwah? Demikian juga undang undang civil.
Ia mesti direview mengikut keadaan zaman.
Mesej Anwar sebenarnya mendalam, tetapi dia memang konsisten dari
dahulu lagi. Tahun 1980 sejak saya mula kenal dengan pendirian Anwar.
Dia seorang Islam progressif, bukan jenis PAS, terutama sekali PAS
dahulu. DiSAbah, memang sudah lama kami begini disebabkan keadaan.
Sebab itu lah kami merasa lain dengan kempen PAS.
Kes Saman Anwar : Mahkamah Diberitahu Temu Bual Di BBC Sokong
Homoseksual
Published by AIDC on August 14, 2012 | 6 Comments
AIDCNews – 14/08/12 – Bekas Pesuruhjaya PAS Selangor, Datuk Dr Hasan
Ali yang turut dipanggil menjadi saksi memberitahu Mahkamah Tinggi
semalam bahawa temu bual Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim dengan badan
penyiaran British, BBC, mengenai undang-undang berkaitan homoseksual
yang disiarkan pada 12 Jan lepas, membawa maksud supaya menyokong
kegiatan itu.
Semasa pemeriksaan balas oleh peguam N.Surendran yang mewakili Anwar,
Hassan berkata maksud sokongan itu perlu dibaca secara keseluruhan dan
bukannya memilih ayat-ayat tertentu.
Surendran: Anwar telah mengatakan "We Muslims and non-Muslims in
Malaysia generally believe and committed to support the sanctity of
marriage between men and women". Berdasarkan pendapat anda, adakah
ayat ini menunjukkan Anwar tidak menyokong homoseksual?
Hasan: Yang Arif saya membaca keseluruhan ayat. Ayat pertama dan ayat
kedua (but we should not be seen to be punitive and consider the
archaic law as relevant) tidak dapat berdiri dengan sendirinya dan ia
tidak memberi maksud homoseksual tidak diterima.
Surendran: Kalau kita lihat ayat kedua, adakah anda setuju 'archaic
law' adalah undang-undang lapuk?
Hasan: Saya tak setuju sebab kelapukan tidak pernah berlaku dalam
undang-undang Islam.
Surendran: Berdasarkan kenyataan "We Muslims and non-Muslims in
Malaysia generally believe and committed to support the sanctity of
marriage between men and women" adakah Anwar menyokong institusi
perkahwinan antara lelaki dan perempuan?
Hasan: Ya setuju.
Surendran: Dalam ayat ketiga "We need to review them. We do not
promote homosexuality in public sphere and domain". Adakah ayat itu
menunjukkan Anwar menyokong homoseksual?
Hasan: Ya
Surendran: Anda pasti dengan jawapan itu?
Hasan: Ya
Surendran: Saya cadangkan kepada anda ayat ini tidak sokong
homoseksual tapi sokong perkahwinan.
Hasan: Saya tak setuju
Hasan juga turut disoal balas oleh seorang lagi peguam Anwar, Latheefa
Koya berkenaan dengan aktiviti homoseksual di tempat persendirian
bukan merupakan satu jenayah jika dibandingkan dengan di khalayak
umum.
Hassan menjawab, dalam hukum Islam dosa tetap dianggap satu jenayah
tidak kira ia dilakukan secara sembunyi atau terang-terangan.
Latheefa:Adakah anda tahu perbezan antara dosa dengan jenayah.
Hasan: Saya tak pasti.
Latheefa: Saya cadangkan kepada anda sesuatu kegiatan yang dilakukan
dalam Islam boleh dianggap sebagai dosa tetapi sekiranya tidak
dilakukan di hadapan khalayak ramai, ia tidak boleh dijadikan sebagai
jenayah. Adakah anda setuju?
Hasan: Tidak setuju. Sama ada di tempat awam atau tertutup, kalau itu
tidak dibolehkan (berdosa), maka ia tetap tidak dibolehkan.
Hasan, saksi defendan pertama, berkata demikian pada perbicaraan kes
saman Anwar terhadap Utusan Melayu (Malaysia) Bhd dan ketua
pengarangnya Datuk Abdul Aziz Ishak berhubung artikel mengenai komen
Anwar bersama BBC mengenai undang-undang berkaitan homoseksual.
Pada 20 Januari lalu, Anwar memfailkan saman fitnah itu bagi menuntut
ganti rugi RM50 juta, atas dakwaan telah menerbitkan dua artikel di
muka hadapan dan muka surat 10 akhbar Utusan Malaysia bertarikh 17
Januari tahun ini berhubung temu bualnya bersama BBC.
Semasa pemeriksaan semula oleh peguam Datuk Firoz Hussein Ahmad
Jamaluddin yang mewakili Utusan Malaysia, bahawa perkataan 'review
archaic laws', 'punitive', 'punishment not relevant' dan 'public
spehere and domain' membawa maksud kegiatan homoseksual boleh
dihalalkan, Hasan berkata pada bacaannya ia bermaksud menghalalkan
kegiatan homoseksual.
Perbicaraan bersambung 23 Oktober ini.
Anwar menipu Qardawi kah?
Dengar betul betul video Zul Nordin ini.
Siapa yang menipu Qardawi? Anwar kah atau Zul Noordin?
Ini lah kelemahan Anwar dan juga kelebihan Anwar. Dia terlalu percaya
dengan penipu penipu macam Zul Noordin ini. Namun ia juga kekuatan
Anwar, sebab dia sanggup berdakwah kepada mereka yang kurang Iman
macam mereka ini, supaya mereka insaf. Ini adalah antara risiko yang
kita hadapi untuk hidup didunia ini.
Seperti tuduhan PAS sewaktu Anwar masuk UMNO; Bagaimana membersihkan
tong najis kalu masuk dalam tong najis? Walaupun terbukti Anwar gagal,
namun saya sokong Anwar dalam hal ini. DiSabah pun kita terpaksa buat
begini. Sebab kawan kita semua pun bersikap najis najis semua. Namun
kita perlu menguatkan diri untuk berdakwah kepada mereka supaya faham
akan hukum Allah.
Berdakwah dengan tingkah laku, bukan dengan percakapan sahaja.
Risikonya, berkahwan dengan najis najis ini, kita pun dianggap najis
juga, macam siZul Nordin ini.
Dia yang menipu Qardawi, Anwar pula yang dituduh.
SEolah olah Qardawi ini seorang Ulama bodoh pula.
Dalam hukum Islam, menuduh seorang tanpa saksi penuh, memang fitnah.
Tidak perlu Qardawi memerlukan bukti lanjut. Kalau UMNO cuma ada
seorang saksi sahaja, walaupun pun dengan DNA didalam buntut Saiful
selama 2 hari ditahan, walaupu sudah diperiksa beberapa kali oleh
doktor doktor. Bagaimana Qardawi boleh buat fatwah selain fatwah
bahawa ini adalah FITNAH belaka.
http://www.anwaraidc.com/?p=19629
Zul Noordin: Dr Yusuf Qardawi Deceived
Published by AIDC on December 8, 2011 | 0 Comment
AIDCNews – 8/12/11 – Member of Parliament for Kulim-Bandar Baru, Datuk
Zulkifli Noordin has admitted to have deceived renowned cleric Syeikh
Dr Yusuf Qardawi into issuing a fatwa supporting the sodomy II case
involving Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and his aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari
Azlan.
"We have made a mistake…we admit making the mistake. I was among those
who made the mistake, and I must meet up with Syeikh Yusuf Qardawi to
make amendments.
"Because…we wish to inform (that) it was true we had deceived Syeikh
Yusuf Qardawi into believing that Anwar had been slandered," he said.
As Anwar's lawyer, Zulkifli had prepared biased questions to elicit
the fatwa from Dr Yusuf Al Qardawi in 2009.
According to him, he was responsible in preparing the questions, which
sided Anwar and hiding the truth about the complainant, Mohd Saiful.
"I was the one who gave the briefing and prepared the questions
couched in specific forms to persuade and convince Syeikh Yusuf
Qardawi that Anwar had been slandered…that was how it was pictured.
"We completely avoided the truth about the case, (for example) that
Saiful was Anwar's employee…we didn't tell him about Saiful
complaining that he had been sodomised.
"We (only) described that there was slander in this sodomy case. When
he understood the way we put it, Syeikh Yusuf Qardawi immediately
issued the 'Qazaf' fatwa,"
Zulkifli, who was one of Anwar's defence lawyers in the sodomy I trial
(1998), also admitted what he did was wrong and sinful because he went
to the extent of lying to the respected cleric just to save Anwar's
reputation and image.
"Looking back, we find we have committed much sin relating to this
matter…to the extent that we even had the audacity to deceive a cleric
of such stature in believing that the issue faced by Anwar was one of
slander – an issue that needed to be addressed through Qazaf.
"That was why I spoke in parliament…we have made a mistake and I am
asking our colleagues not to persist in doing the same.
"Alhamdulillah, Allah has made me realise. I still have the time to
meet certain people and ask for apologies…and I have done so.
"I have the responsibility to meet him (Syeikh Yusuf Qardawi) to
explain and correct the situation, if it can still be corrected, that
is. If he refuses to accept it, then it will be his responsibility,
but at least I have tried to make amendments about what I have done,"
he said.
The Swearing
Besides that, Zulkifli also revealed other things that happened in
1998, which before this have not been told to the public.
This includes, the truth about Datuk Dr Haron Din and (the late) Dato'
Haji Ishak bin Baharom (the former Mufti of Selangor), who demanded
that Anwar take an oath to clear his name.
Also revealed was the truth about Anwar's 'swearing' at Lokman Noor
Adam's house in Batu Pahat, Johor and at the National Mosque in 1998.
According to him, from 1998 until now Anwar has yet to perform an
oath.
"We, as Muslims, should at least ask about this. Whether it is
convincing or otherwise is a different matter, but at least it is
something that we ought to do.
"Why is it so difficult (to take an oath)? Why is it so difficult to
provide a DNA sample? What's the problem in giving the Omega watch? It
is immaterial whether we believe or not, but yet again, at least we
have tried.
"I wish to reiterate one more time…please don't do the same mistake we
did by not asking…it was our biggest misgiving," he added.
Siapa yang menipu Qardawi? Anwar kah atau Zul Noordin?
Ini lah kelemahan Anwar dan juga kelebihan Anwar. Dia terlalu percaya
dengan penipu penipu macam Zul Noordin ini. Namun ia juga kekuatan
Anwar, sebab dia sanggup berdakwah kepada mereka yang kurang Iman
macam mereka ini, supaya mereka insaf. Ini adalah antara risiko yang
kita hadapi untuk hidup didunia ini.
Seperti tuduhan PAS sewaktu Anwar masuk UMNO; Bagaimana membersihkan
tong najis kalu masuk dalam tong najis? Walaupun terbukti Anwar gagal,
namun saya sokong Anwar dalam hal ini. DiSabah pun kita terpaksa buat
begini. Sebab kawan kita semua pun bersikap najis najis semua. Namun
kita perlu menguatkan diri untuk berdakwah kepada mereka supaya faham
akan hukum Allah.
Berdakwah dengan tingkah laku, bukan dengan percakapan sahaja.
Risikonya, berkahwan dengan najis najis ini, kita pun dianggap najis
juga, macam siZul Nordin ini.
Dia yang menipu Qardawi, Anwar pula yang dituduh.
SEolah olah Qardawi ini seorang Ulama bodoh pula.
Dalam hukum Islam, menuduh seorang tanpa saksi penuh, memang fitnah.
Tidak perlu Qardawi memerlukan bukti lanjut. Kalau UMNO cuma ada
seorang saksi sahaja, walaupun pun dengan DNA didalam buntut Saiful
selama 2 hari ditahan, walaupu sudah diperiksa beberapa kali oleh
doktor doktor. Bagaimana Qardawi boleh buat fatwah selain fatwah
bahawa ini adalah FITNAH belaka.
http://www.anwaraidc.com/?p=19629
Zul Noordin: Dr Yusuf Qardawi Deceived
Published by AIDC on December 8, 2011 | 0 Comment
AIDCNews – 8/12/11 – Member of Parliament for Kulim-Bandar Baru, Datuk
Zulkifli Noordin has admitted to have deceived renowned cleric Syeikh
Dr Yusuf Qardawi into issuing a fatwa supporting the sodomy II case
involving Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and his aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari
Azlan.
"We have made a mistake…we admit making the mistake. I was among those
who made the mistake, and I must meet up with Syeikh Yusuf Qardawi to
make amendments.
"Because…we wish to inform (that) it was true we had deceived Syeikh
Yusuf Qardawi into believing that Anwar had been slandered," he said.
As Anwar's lawyer, Zulkifli had prepared biased questions to elicit
the fatwa from Dr Yusuf Al Qardawi in 2009.
According to him, he was responsible in preparing the questions, which
sided Anwar and hiding the truth about the complainant, Mohd Saiful.
"I was the one who gave the briefing and prepared the questions
couched in specific forms to persuade and convince Syeikh Yusuf
Qardawi that Anwar had been slandered…that was how it was pictured.
"We completely avoided the truth about the case, (for example) that
Saiful was Anwar's employee…we didn't tell him about Saiful
complaining that he had been sodomised.
"We (only) described that there was slander in this sodomy case. When
he understood the way we put it, Syeikh Yusuf Qardawi immediately
issued the 'Qazaf' fatwa,"
Zulkifli, who was one of Anwar's defence lawyers in the sodomy I trial
(1998), also admitted what he did was wrong and sinful because he went
to the extent of lying to the respected cleric just to save Anwar's
reputation and image.
"Looking back, we find we have committed much sin relating to this
matter…to the extent that we even had the audacity to deceive a cleric
of such stature in believing that the issue faced by Anwar was one of
slander – an issue that needed to be addressed through Qazaf.
"That was why I spoke in parliament…we have made a mistake and I am
asking our colleagues not to persist in doing the same.
"Alhamdulillah, Allah has made me realise. I still have the time to
meet certain people and ask for apologies…and I have done so.
"I have the responsibility to meet him (Syeikh Yusuf Qardawi) to
explain and correct the situation, if it can still be corrected, that
is. If he refuses to accept it, then it will be his responsibility,
but at least I have tried to make amendments about what I have done,"
he said.
The Swearing
Besides that, Zulkifli also revealed other things that happened in
1998, which before this have not been told to the public.
This includes, the truth about Datuk Dr Haron Din and (the late) Dato'
Haji Ishak bin Baharom (the former Mufti of Selangor), who demanded
that Anwar take an oath to clear his name.
Also revealed was the truth about Anwar's 'swearing' at Lokman Noor
Adam's house in Batu Pahat, Johor and at the National Mosque in 1998.
According to him, from 1998 until now Anwar has yet to perform an
oath.
"We, as Muslims, should at least ask about this. Whether it is
convincing or otherwise is a different matter, but at least it is
something that we ought to do.
"Why is it so difficult (to take an oath)? Why is it so difficult to
provide a DNA sample? What's the problem in giving the Omega watch? It
is immaterial whether we believe or not, but yet again, at least we
have tried.
"I wish to reiterate one more time…please don't do the same mistake we
did by not asking…it was our biggest misgiving," he added.
Debt of Honour: Tom Clancy
Interesting book. It predicts 911 disaster, and explains about future
air and naval battles.
air and naval battles.
Saturday, 25 August 2012
Anwar ahli Freemason?
http://www.anwaraidc.com/?p=26951
Anwar Freemason? Tun Mustapha pun di tuduh ahli Freemason. Dalam
selidik saya, tiada masala lah menjadi ahli freemason. Sama juga jadi
ahli rotary Club dll. Namun, terdengar cerita ini kembali, ingat pula
aku cerita Tun Mustapha. Dikaji dengan fitnah fitnah UMNO yang lain,
saya sekarang sudah pasti ini adalah fitnah belaka, untuk merampas
hasil Sabah dan saya telah bersalah kerana tidak menguatkan kesangsian
saya. Freemason adalah persatuan Yahudi yang amat rahsia? Kenapa buka
rahsia sekarang? Hubungan UMNO dengan Yahudi memang terbukti kuat,
maklumlah dua dua gila wang. Tida mustahil, propaganda ini dari UMNO
yang membayar Freemason untuk merosakkan nama 2 pejuang Islam. Kedua
dua taat kepada hukum Islam dan berani bersuara tentang Islam.
Anwar Freemason? Tun Mustapha pun di tuduh ahli Freemason. Dalam
selidik saya, tiada masala lah menjadi ahli freemason. Sama juga jadi
ahli rotary Club dll. Namun, terdengar cerita ini kembali, ingat pula
aku cerita Tun Mustapha. Dikaji dengan fitnah fitnah UMNO yang lain,
saya sekarang sudah pasti ini adalah fitnah belaka, untuk merampas
hasil Sabah dan saya telah bersalah kerana tidak menguatkan kesangsian
saya. Freemason adalah persatuan Yahudi yang amat rahsia? Kenapa buka
rahsia sekarang? Hubungan UMNO dengan Yahudi memang terbukti kuat,
maklumlah dua dua gila wang. Tida mustahil, propaganda ini dari UMNO
yang membayar Freemason untuk merosakkan nama 2 pejuang Islam. Kedua
dua taat kepada hukum Islam dan berani bersuara tentang Islam.
Azmin di buang Emak
http://www.anwaraidc.com/?p=26986
Baca disitu. Azmin Diberi 2 syarat baru boleh jumpa emak. Patutlah.
Baca disitu. Azmin Diberi 2 syarat baru boleh jumpa emak. Patutlah.
Tuesday, 21 August 2012
living under a cruel government
http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/8/21/business/11886768&sec=business
Thank you opposition parties. You wake me up to the cruelty committed
against me these last few decades. How could I be so foolish to
believe in government propaganda.
I had to endure debts that destroy my income. It is the worst taxation
ever. I used to believe that cars are not necessities but trying to
travel by bus is both dangerous and a wate of time and money.
The high taxation was promised to give better road, public
transportation and better job prospects as a result of a good car
industry. All are just false promises. Developed nations like Japan
and UK, recently developed nations like Korea and Taiwan, have much
better road, public transport and car industry despite not having high
car taxations that are ultimately paid by every citizen.
Now the government want to compare itself with similarly corrupt and
backward nations like Indonesia and Philippines that both suffer from
acute dictatorships? This is evidence enough that Malaysia had suffer
red from similar dictatorsip illness due to its censored newspapers
and curbs on opposition parties, where stupid lies like this attached
article are forced fed to the people.
Now I had to pay for my stupidity. I spent my time paying for high car
taxes without any improvement in my quality of life. The government is
supposed to help the citizens, not squeeze them hard. It was much
better under the British colony. We cannot get jobs easily without
paying a lot of money to get useless degrees that cannot guarantee
jobs. This was despite not having natural resources like oil palm and
petroleum. Now, we are lucky if our children work in our home towns.
Now the article below claimed that to reduce car tax will make
citizens lose money because they cannot sell it back? Just refund the
tax lah! Is it so difficult to do? If you claim that it will reduce
the development projects, it was just a repeat of all the previous
lies. Don't develop lah! It is the people who develop. Once the people
have money, only then will the nations develop like Korea, Taiwan and
Hong Kong!
Even now, despite burdened by high car taxes, we are still burdened by
road tolls, road taxes and insurances. Our road tax is lower than
Thailand? Combine it with exorbitant car tax and loan shark car park
operators, then you can get the true picture. Malaysia has the highest
government overall tax without anything to show for it.
Traffic jams get worse instead of getting less.
Revised NAP likely to include policy to reduce car prices over next
3-4 years
PETALING JAYA: The revised National Automotive Policy (NAP) will
include a policy that will address the gradual reduction of car prices
in the country, said an industry source.
"The Government, through the Malaysia Automotive Institute (MAI), had
engaged us in the past few months to discuss on the matter," he told
StarBiz.
"There will be a policy that will tackle the gradual reduction of car
prices in Malaysia. Details of this policy are expected to be made
public in the near future," he added.
The source said the policy would outline a structure to gradually
reduce car prices over the next three to four years.
What happens to second-hand cars? Naza Group of Companies joint
executive chairman SM Nasarudin SM Nasimuddin was quoted in a recent
report as saying: if prices dropped, the resale value of a car would
then plummet but the loan amount owed to banks (on cars already
bought) would be unchanged.
The Government has been considering it (the reduction of car prices)
in the revised NAP and it was only a matter of time for this issue to
be addressed," said the industry source.
It is a known fact that the prices of cars are high in Malaysia
compared with Thailand.
However, it has been argued that the cost of vehicle ownership in
Malaysia is still among the most competitive in the Asean region,
primarily due to the subsidised fuel prices, cheaper road tax and
insurance premiums.
In a recent news report, MAI chief executive officer Madani Sahari was
quoted as saying that Malaysia had the second lowest cost of vehicle
ownership in the region after the Philippines.
According to him, the cost of vehicle ownership in Malaysia, compared
to Thailand and Indonesia, was lower by 39% and 12% respectively.
In terms of petrol prices, Thailand was the highest, followed by
Singapore, Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines, Madani said in the
news report.
Meanwhile, on the point of car prices being slashed overnight via the
reduction of vehicle excise duties, industry observers argue that the
impact would be negative for existing buyers rather than first-time
ones.
"If you're a first-time buyer, it would be like a dream come true as
it means you can now afford to buy a car that was too expensive
previously," said one industry observer who requested anonymity.
"For the existing buyer, it would mean that the resale value of the
car would have diminished overnight," he added.
It is also argued that the sudden drop in vehicle prices would have a
severe impact on second-hand car dealers.
Those servicing existing car loans will also be severely affected.
In a local news report recently, Naza Group of Companies joint
executive chairman SM Nasarudin SM Nasimuddin was quoted as saying
that if taxes were scrapped, consumers would have to overpay bank
loans taken for their vehicles.
In the report, Nasarudin claimed that if prices dropped, the resale
value of a car would then plummet but the loan amount owed to banks
would be unchanged.
Thank you opposition parties. You wake me up to the cruelty committed
against me these last few decades. How could I be so foolish to
believe in government propaganda.
I had to endure debts that destroy my income. It is the worst taxation
ever. I used to believe that cars are not necessities but trying to
travel by bus is both dangerous and a wate of time and money.
The high taxation was promised to give better road, public
transportation and better job prospects as a result of a good car
industry. All are just false promises. Developed nations like Japan
and UK, recently developed nations like Korea and Taiwan, have much
better road, public transport and car industry despite not having high
car taxations that are ultimately paid by every citizen.
Now the government want to compare itself with similarly corrupt and
backward nations like Indonesia and Philippines that both suffer from
acute dictatorships? This is evidence enough that Malaysia had suffer
red from similar dictatorsip illness due to its censored newspapers
and curbs on opposition parties, where stupid lies like this attached
article are forced fed to the people.
Now I had to pay for my stupidity. I spent my time paying for high car
taxes without any improvement in my quality of life. The government is
supposed to help the citizens, not squeeze them hard. It was much
better under the British colony. We cannot get jobs easily without
paying a lot of money to get useless degrees that cannot guarantee
jobs. This was despite not having natural resources like oil palm and
petroleum. Now, we are lucky if our children work in our home towns.
Now the article below claimed that to reduce car tax will make
citizens lose money because they cannot sell it back? Just refund the
tax lah! Is it so difficult to do? If you claim that it will reduce
the development projects, it was just a repeat of all the previous
lies. Don't develop lah! It is the people who develop. Once the people
have money, only then will the nations develop like Korea, Taiwan and
Hong Kong!
Even now, despite burdened by high car taxes, we are still burdened by
road tolls, road taxes and insurances. Our road tax is lower than
Thailand? Combine it with exorbitant car tax and loan shark car park
operators, then you can get the true picture. Malaysia has the highest
government overall tax without anything to show for it.
Traffic jams get worse instead of getting less.
Revised NAP likely to include policy to reduce car prices over next
3-4 years
PETALING JAYA: The revised National Automotive Policy (NAP) will
include a policy that will address the gradual reduction of car prices
in the country, said an industry source.
"The Government, through the Malaysia Automotive Institute (MAI), had
engaged us in the past few months to discuss on the matter," he told
StarBiz.
"There will be a policy that will tackle the gradual reduction of car
prices in Malaysia. Details of this policy are expected to be made
public in the near future," he added.
The source said the policy would outline a structure to gradually
reduce car prices over the next three to four years.
What happens to second-hand cars? Naza Group of Companies joint
executive chairman SM Nasarudin SM Nasimuddin was quoted in a recent
report as saying: if prices dropped, the resale value of a car would
then plummet but the loan amount owed to banks (on cars already
bought) would be unchanged.
The Government has been considering it (the reduction of car prices)
in the revised NAP and it was only a matter of time for this issue to
be addressed," said the industry source.
It is a known fact that the prices of cars are high in Malaysia
compared with Thailand.
However, it has been argued that the cost of vehicle ownership in
Malaysia is still among the most competitive in the Asean region,
primarily due to the subsidised fuel prices, cheaper road tax and
insurance premiums.
In a recent news report, MAI chief executive officer Madani Sahari was
quoted as saying that Malaysia had the second lowest cost of vehicle
ownership in the region after the Philippines.
According to him, the cost of vehicle ownership in Malaysia, compared
to Thailand and Indonesia, was lower by 39% and 12% respectively.
In terms of petrol prices, Thailand was the highest, followed by
Singapore, Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines, Madani said in the
news report.
Meanwhile, on the point of car prices being slashed overnight via the
reduction of vehicle excise duties, industry observers argue that the
impact would be negative for existing buyers rather than first-time
ones.
"If you're a first-time buyer, it would be like a dream come true as
it means you can now afford to buy a car that was too expensive
previously," said one industry observer who requested anonymity.
"For the existing buyer, it would mean that the resale value of the
car would have diminished overnight," he added.
It is also argued that the sudden drop in vehicle prices would have a
severe impact on second-hand car dealers.
Those servicing existing car loans will also be severely affected.
In a local news report recently, Naza Group of Companies joint
executive chairman SM Nasarudin SM Nasimuddin was quoted as saying
that if taxes were scrapped, consumers would have to overpay bank
loans taken for their vehicles.
In the report, Nasarudin claimed that if prices dropped, the resale
value of a car would then plummet but the loan amount owed to banks
would be unchanged.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)