Wednesday, 7 September 2011

The fall of Tripoli: An excellent article

MYT 1:15:54 AM SPECIAL REPORT - The secret plan to take Tripoli

TRIPOLI (Reuters) - Colonel Muammar Gaddafi's regime was delivered by a caterer, on a memory stick.
Libyan rebels celebrate at Bab Al-Aziziya compound in Tripoli August 23, 2011. (REUTERS/Louafi Larbi/Files)
Abdel Majid Mlegta ran the companies that supplied meals to Libyan government departments including the interior ministry. The job was "easy," he told Reuters last week. "I built good relations with officers. I wanted to serve my country."
But in the first few weeks of the uprising, he secretly began to work for the rebels. He recruited sympathisers at the nerve centre of the Gaddafi government, pinpointed its weak links and its command-and-control strength in Tripoli, and passed that information onto the rebel leadership on a series of flash memory cards.
The first was handed to him, he says, by Gaddafi military intelligence and security officers. It contained information about seven key operations rooms in the capital, including internal security, the Gaddafi revolutionary committees, the popular guards -- as Gaddafi's voluntary armed militia was known -- and military intelligence.
The data included names of the commanders of those units, how many people worked in each centre and how they worked, as well as crucial details like the number plates of their cars, and how each unit communicated with the central command led by intelligence chief Abdullah al-Senussi and Gaddafi's second son Saif al-Islam.
That memory card -- which Mlegta later handed to officials at the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) -- provided the basis of a sophisticated plan to topple the Libyan dictator and seize Tripoli. The operation, which took months of planning, involved secretly arming rebel units inside the capital. Those units would help NATO destroy strategic targets in the city -- operation rooms, safe houses, military barracks, police stations, armoured cars, radars and telephone centres. At an agreed time, the units would then rise up as rebels attacked from all sides.
The rebels called the plan Operation Dawn Mermaid. This is the inside story -- much of it never before told -- of how that plan unfolded.
The rebels were not alone. British operatives infiltrated Tripoli and planted radio equipment to help target air strikes and avoid killing civilians, according to U.S. and allied sources. The French supplied training and transport for new weapons. Washington helped at a critical late point by adding two extra Predator drones to the skies over Tripoli, improving NATO's ability to strike. Also vital, say western and rebel officials, was the covert support of Arab states such as the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. Doha gave weapons, military training and money to the rebels.
By the time the rebels were ready for the final assault, they were so confident of success that they openly named the date and time of the attack: Saturday, Aug. 20, at 8 p.m., just after most people in Tripoli broke their Ramadan fast.
"We didn't make it a secret," said Mohammed Gula, who led a pro-rebel political cell in central Tripoli and spoke to Reuters as rebels first entered Gaddafi's Bab al-Aziziyah compound. "We said it out on the street. People didn't believe us. They believe us now."
THE DIGITAL GIFT
Planning began in April, two months into the uprising. Rebel leader Mahmoud Jibril and three other senior insurgents met in the Tunisian city of Djerba, according to both Mlegta and another senior official from the National Transitional Council (NTC), as the alternative rebel government calls itself.
The three were Mlegta, who by then had fled Tripoli and joined the rebels as the head of a brigade; Ahmed Mustafa al-Majbary, who was head of logistics and supplies; and Othman Abdel-Jalil, a scientist who became coordinator of the Tripoli plan.
Before he fled, Mlegta had spent just under two months working inside the regime, building up a network of sympathisers. At first, 14 of Gaddafi's officers were prepared to help. By the end there were 72, Mlegta says. "We used to meet at my house and sometimes at the houses of two other officers... We preserved the secrecy of our work and it was in coordination with the NTC executive committee."
Brigadier General Abdulsalam Alhasi, commander of the rebels' main operation centre in Benghazi, said those secretly helping the rebels were "police, security, military, even some people from the cabinet; many, many people. They gave us information and gave instructions to the people working with them, somehow to support the revolution."
One of those was al-Barani Ashkal, commander-in-chief of the guard at Gaddaffi's military compound in the suburbs of Tripoli. Like many, Ashkal wanted to defect, but was asked by the NTC to remain in his post where, Alhasi says, he would become instrumental in helping the rebels enter the city.
The rebel planning committee -- another four men would join later, making seven in all -- knew that the targets on the memory sticks were the key to crippling Gaddafi's forces. The men included Hisham abu Hajar, chief commander of the Tripoli Brigade, Usama Abu Ras, who liaised with some cells inside Tripoli, and Rashed Suwan, who helped financially and coordinated with the tribes of Tripoli to ease the rebels' entry.
According to Mlegta and to Hisham Buhagiar, a rebel colonel and the committee's seventh member, the group initially drew up a list of 120 sites for NATO to target in the days leading up to their attack.
Rebel leaders discussed their idea with French President Nicolas Sarkozy at a meeting at the Elysee Palace on April 20.
That meeting was one of five in Paris in April and May, according to Mlegta. Most were attended by the chiefs of staff of NATO countries involved in the bombing campaign, which had begun in March, as well as military officials from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.
After presenting the rebels' plan "from A to Z", Mlegta handed NATO officials three memory cards: the one packed with information about regime strongholds in Tripoli; another with updated information on regime sites as well as details of 65 Gaddafi officers sympatheric to the rebels who had been secretly supplied with NATO radiophones; and a third which contained the plot to take Tripoli.
Sarkozy expressed enthusiasm for the plan, according to Mlegta and the senior NTC official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The leaders slimmed the 120 targets down to 82 and "assigned 2,000 armed men to go into Tripoli and 6,000 unarmed to go out (onto the streets) in the uprising," according to rebel colonel Buhagiar. He joined the opposition National Front for the Salvation of Libya in 1981 and has lived in the United States and trained as a special forces operative in both Sudan and Iraq.
There were already anti-Gaddafi cells in the capital that the rebels knew they could activate. "The problem was that we needed time," the senior NTC official said. "We feared that some units may go out into the streets in a spontaneous way and they would be quashed. We also needed time to smuggle weapons, fighters and boats."
In the early months of the uprising, pro-rebel fighters had slipped out of Tripoli and made their way to the north-western city of Misrata, where they were trained for the uprising, rebels in Misrata told Reuters in June. The leaders of two rebel units said "hundreds" of Tripoli residents had begun slipping back into the city by mid-July. Commander Alhasi and other rebel officers in Benghazi said the number of infiltrators sent into Tripoli was dozens, not hundreds.
"This was not D-Day," Alhasi told Reuters in his office.
"THE OVERSEAS BRIGADE"
Most of the infiltrators travelled to Tripoli by fishing trawler, according to Alhasi. They were equipped with light weapons -- rifles and sub-machineguns -- hand grenades, demolition charges and radios.
"We could call them and they could call each other," Alhasi said. "Most of them were volunteers, from all parts of Libya, and Libyans from overseas. Everybody wants to do something for the success of the revolution."
Although Tripoli was ostensibly under the control of Gaddafi loyalists, rebels said the security system was porous: bribery or other ruses could be used to get in and out. Small groups of men also began probing the government's security system with nighttime attacks on checkpoints, according to one operative who talked to Reuters in June.
It was possible to smuggle weapons into Tripoli, but it was easier and less risky -- if far more expensive -- to buy them from Gaddafi loyalists looking to make a profit before the regime collapsed. The going rate for a Kalashnikov in Tripoli was $5,000 over the summer; in Misrata the same weapon cost $3,000.
Morale got a boost when rebels broke into government communication channels and recorded 2,000 calls between the regime's top leadership, including a few with Gaddafi's sons, on everything from military orders to sex. The NTC mined the taped calls for information and broadcast some of them on rebel TV, a move that frightened the regime, according to the senior NTC source. "They knew then that we had infiltrated and broken into their ranks."
Recordings of two of the calls were also handed to the International Criminal Court. One featured Gaddafi's prime minister al-Baghdadi al-Mahmoudi threatening to burn the family of Abdel Rahman Shalgham, a one-time Libyan ambassador to the United Nations and an early defector to the rebels. Al-Mahmoudi described Shalgham as a slave. The other was between al-Mahmoudi and Tayeb al-Safi, minister of economy and trade; the pair joked about how the Gaddafi brigades would rape the women of Zawiyah when they entered the town.
Several allied and U.S. officials, as well as a source close to the Libyan rebels, said that around the beginning of May, foreign military trainers including British, French and Italian operatives, as well as representatives from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, began to organise serious efforts to hone the rebels into a more effective fighting force.
Most of the training happened in the rebel-held Western Mountains. But Eric Denece, a former French intelligence operative and now Director of the French Centre for Research on Intelligence, says an elite rebel force of fighters from the east was trained both inside and outside Libya, at NATO bases and those of other allies. This "overseas brigade" was then dropped back into the country. In all, estimated Denece, some 100-200 foreign operatives were sent to Libya, where they focused on training and military coordination. Mlegta confirms that number.
FRENCH DROPS, BRITISH INFILTRATION
Rebel commander Alhasi insists western special forces were not involved in combat; the main help they gave was with the bombing campaign and training. London, Paris and Washington also say their troops were not involved in combat.
"They complied with our (bombing) requirements, immediately sometimes, sometimes we had a delay," said Alhasi, who has a big satellite photograph of Tripoli on one of his walls. "We had the information on the ground about the targets and relayed it to them."
A European official knowledgeable about such operations said "dozens" of plain-clothes French military advisers were sent to Libya. A French official said between 30 and 40 "military advisers" helped organise the rebels and trained them on basic weapons and more high-tech hardware.
In May, the French began smuggling weapons into western Libya. French military spokesmen later confirmed these arms drops, saying they were justified as "humanitarian support", but also briefing that the aim was to prepare for an advance on Tripoli.
British undercover personnel carried out some of the most important on-the-ground missions by allied forces before the fall of Tripoli, U.S. and allied officials told Reuters.
One of their key tasks, according to allied officials, was planting radio equipment to help allied forces target Gaddafi's military forces and command-and-control centres. This involved dangerous missions to infiltrate the capital, locate specific potential targets and then plant equipment so bomber planes could precisely target munitions, destroying sensitive targets without killing bystanders.
WASHINGTON'S ROLE
In mid-March, a month after violent resistance to Gaddafi's rule first erupted, President Obama had signed a sweeping top secret order, known as a covert operations "finding", which gave broad authorisation to the CIA to support the rebels.
But while the general authorisation encompassed a wide variety of possible measures, the presidential finding required the CIA to come back to the White House for specific permissions to move ahead and help them. Several U.S. officials said that, because of concerns about the rebels' disorganisation, internal politics, and limited paramilitary capabilities, clandestine U.S. support on the ground never went much beyond intelligence collection.
U.S. officials acknowledge that as rebel forces closed in on Tripoli, such intelligence "collection" efforts by the CIA and other American agencies in Libya became very extensive and included efforts to help the rebels and other NATO allies track down Gaddafi and his entourage. But the Obama administration's intention, the officials indicated, was that if any such intelligence fell into American hands it would be passed onto others.
A senior U.S. defence official disclosed to Reuters details of a legal opinion showing the Pentagon would not be able to supply lethal aid to the rebels -- even with the U.S. recognition of the NTC.
"It was a legal judgment that the quasi-recognition that we gave to the NTC as the legitimate representative of the Libyan people didn't check the legal box to authorise us to be providing lethal assistance under the Arms Export Control Act," the senior official said.
HELP FROM THE GULF
In some ways the rebels' most unlikely ally was Qatar.
The Gulf Arab state is keen to downplay its role, perhaps understandably given that it is ruled by an absolute monarch. But on the ground, signs abounded of the emirate's support. The weapons and equipment the French brought in were mostly supplied by Qatar, according to rebel sources. In May, a Reuters reporter saw equipment in boxes clearly stamped "Qatar." It included mortar kits, military fatigues, radios and binoculars. At another location, Reuters saw new anti-tank missiles.
Qatar's decision to supply arms to the rebellion, one source close to the NTC told Reuters, was instigated by influential Libyan Islamist scholar Ali Salabi, who sought refuge in Qatar after fleeing Libya in the late 1990s. He had previously worked with Gaddafi's son Saif, to help rehabilitate Libyans who had fought in Afghanistan. Salabi's brother Ismael is also a leader of a rebel militia in Libya.
Salabi "is the link to the influential figures in Qatar, and convinced the Qataris to get involved," said the source close to the NTC.
HIRED GUNS
By early June, Libya seemed locked in a stalemate.
After three months of civil war, rebels had seized huge swathes of territory, but NATO bombing had failed to dislodge Gaddafi. The African Union said the only way forward was a ceasefire and negotiated peace. London joined Paris in suggesting that while Gaddafi must step down, perhaps he could stay in Libya.
But hidden away from view, the plan to seize Tripoli was moving into action.
The rebels began making swift advances in the Western Mountains, out of Misrata and around the town of Zintan. Newly arrived Apache attack helicopters operating from Britain's HMS Ocean, an amphibious assault ship, were destroying armoured vehicles. NATO aircraft dropped leaflets to dispirit Gaddafi forces and improve rebel morale.
"The game-changer has been the attack helicopters which have given the NTC more protection from Gaddafi's heavy weapons," a French Defence Ministry official said.
The rebels' foreign backers were eager to hasten the war. For one thing, a U. N. mandate for bombing ran only to the end of September; agreement on an extension was not guaranteed. One U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters the main U.S. concern was "breaking the rough stalemate before the end of the NATO mandate".
The Europeans were also burning through costly munitions and Washington was concerned about wear and tear on NATO allies' aircraft. "Some of the countries... basically every deployable F-16 they had in the inventory was deployed," a senior U.S. defence official told Reuters.
But the momentum was shifting in the rebels' favour.
On July 28, the assassination of rebel military commander Abdel Fatah Younes proved a surprise turning-point. The former Interior Minister had defected to the rebels in February. Some believe he had held back their advance from the east, for reasons that remain unclear. Younes' death at the hands of his own men raised questions about the NTC and added impetus to NATO's desire to push things along in case the anti-Gaddafi forces imploded.
The West forced NTC head Mahmoud Jibril to change his cabinet. NATO then took more of the lead in preparations, according to Denece, who said he has contacts within both French and Libyan intelligence.
There was another boon to the rebels. Regional heavyweight Turkey came out in support of the NTC in July, and then held a conference at which 30 countries backed them. "The Turks actually were very helpful throughout this in a very quiet kind of way," said the senior U.S. defence official.
With the morale of Gaddafi troops eroding, the end was clearly near. Mediocre at the best of times, Gaddafi's fighters began fading away. So too did his secret weapon: foreign mercenaries.
After the uprising began, Gaddafi recruited several thousand mercenaries; some formed the core of his best-organised forces. Most of the hired guns came from countries to Libya's south such as Chad, Mali, and Niger, but some were from further afield, including South Africa and the Balkans.
Among them was a former Bosnian Serb fighter who had fought in Sierra Leone as a mercenary and later worked as a contractor in Afghanistan and Iraq. Hired in March, first as an instructor and later as the commander of a 120mm mortar battery, the fighter, who used his nom-de-guerre Crni ("the Black" in Serbian), told Reuters he had been paid regularly in cash in the western currency of his choice.
"I knew Libyans had poor discipline, but what I have seen was dismal in comparison with what we had in former Yugoslavia during our wars," he told Reuters. "They were cowards, at least many of them. Communications were the biggest problem, as they just couldn't figure out how to operate anything more sophisticated than a walkie-talkie, so we resorted to cellphones, when they worked and while they worked."
It was in early August, he said, that "everything started falling apart." The force of which he was a part began retreating from a rebel onslaught. "At some point we came under fire from a very organised group, and I suspect they were infiltrated (by) NATO ground troops," he said. The loyalist units pulled back to a point about 50 km (30 miles) from Tripoli. By mid-August, "I decided it was enough. I took a jeep with plenty of fuel and water and another two Libyans I trusted, and we travelled across the desert to a neighbouring country. It took us four days to get there."
A DRONE DEBATE
Foreign agents, meanwhile, were circulating far and wide. At the Tunisia-Libya border in early August, a Reuters reporter ran into a Libyan with an American accent who identified himself as the head of the rebel command centre in the Western Mountains. He was accompanied by two muscular blond western men. He said he spent a lot of time in the United States and Canada, but would not elaborate.
As the rebels advanced on Zawiyah, the Reuters reporter also saw western-looking men inside the Western Mountain region travelling in simple, old pickup trucks. Not far away, rebels in Nalut said they were being aided by CIA agents, though this was impossible to verify.
Operation Dawn Mermaid was initially meant to begin on Aug. 10, according to Mohammed Gula, the political cell leader in central Tripoli. But "other cities were not yet ready", the leadership decided, and it was put off for a few days.
A debate flared inside the Pentagon about whether to send extra Predator drones to Libya. "It was a controversial issue even as to whether it made sense to pull (drones) from other places to boost this up to try to bring this to a quicker conclusion," the U.S. defence official said.
Those who backed the use of extra drones won, and the last two Predators were taken from a training base in the United States and sent to north Africa, arriving on Aug. 16.
In the meantime, the rebels had captured several cities. By Aug. 17 or 18, recalls Gula, "when we heard that Zawiyah had fallen, and Zlitan looked like it was about to fall, and Garyan had fallen, we decided now is the time."
Those successes had a knock-on effect, U.S. and NATO officials told Reuters. With much of the country now conquered, Predator drones and other surveillance and strike planes could finally be focused on the capital. Data released by the Pentagon showed a substantial increase in the pace of U.S. air strikes in Libya between Aug. 10 and Aug. 22.
"We didn't have to scan the entire country any longer," a NATO official said. "We were able to focus on where the concentrations of regime forces were."
ZERO HOUR
Days before the attack on Tripoli, the White House began leaking stories to TV networks saying Gaddafi was near the end. But U.S. intelligence officials -- who are supposed to give an objective view of the situation on the ground -- were pushing back, telling journalists they were not so sure of immediate victory and the fighting could go on for months.
Then, on Aug. 19, a breakthrough: Abdel Salam Jalloud, one of the most public faces of Gaddafi's regime, defected. Jalloud had been trying to get out for the previous three months, according to the senior NTC official. "He asked for our help but because he wanted his whole family, not only his immediate one, to flee with him it was a logistical problem. His whole family was around 35."
By now, the mountain roads were under rebel control. They took him and his family from Tripoli to Zintan and across the border into Tunisia. From there, he flew to Italy and on to Qatar.
The rebel leadership was ready. But now NATO wanted more time. "Once they got control of Zawiyah, we were sort of expecting that they would make a strategic pause, regroup and then make the push on into Tripoli," the senior U.S. defence official said.
"We told NATO we're going to go anyway," said a senior NTC official.
The western alliance quickly scaled back its number of bombing targets to 32 from 82, while rebel special forces hit some of the control rooms that were not visible, like those in schools and hospitals.
The signal to attack came soon after sunset on Aug. 20, in a speech by NTC Chairman Mustafa Abdel Jalil. "The noose is tightening," he said. A "veritable bloodbath" was about to occur.
Within 10 minutes of his speech, rebel cells in neighbourhoods across Tripoli started moving. Some units were directly linked to the operation; many others were not but had learned about the plan.
"We didn't choose it, the circumstances and the operations led us to this date," Alhasi told Reuters when asked why the uprising in Tripoli began then. "There was a public plan in Tripoli that they would rise up on that day, by calling from the mosques. It was not a military plan, not an official plan, it was a people's plan. The people inside Tripoli, they did this in coordination with us."
In the first few hours, rebel cells attacked installations and command posts. Others simply secured neighbourhoods, setting up roadblocks and impeding movement.
Ships laden with food and ammunition set off from rebel-held Misrata. Rebel forces began pushing towards the capital from the Western Mountains and from the east. According to French newspapers, NATO cleared a path on the water by destroying pro-Gaddafi speed boats equipped with explosives.
The first rebel soldiers reached the city within a few hours. The rag-tag army didn't look like much: some warriors wore football kit bearing the name of English soccer players. But they encountered little resistance.
One rebel source said Gaddafi had made a fatal error by sending his important brigades and military leaders, including his son Mu'atassem, to secure the oil town of Brega. The Libyan leader apparently feared the loss of the oil area would empower the rebels. But it meant he left Tripoli without strong defences, allowing the rebels easy entry.
The air war was also overwhelming the regime. Under attack, Gaddafi forces brought whatever heavy equipment they still had out of hiding. In the final 24 hours, a western military official said, NATO "could see remnants of Gaddafi forces trying to reconstitute weapons systems, specifically surface-to-air missiles". NATO pounded with them with air strikes.
COLLAPSE
By Sunday Aug. 21, the rebels controlled large parts of Tripoli. In the confusion, the NTC announced it had captured Saif al-Islam. Late the following evening, though, he turned up at the Rixos, the Tripoli hotel where foreign reporters were staying. "I am here to disperse the rumours...," he declared.
U.S. and European officials now say they believe Saif was never in custody. NTC chief Mahmoud Jibril attributes the fiasco to conflicting reports within the rebel forces. But, he says, the bumbling turned into a bonanza: "The news of his arrest gave us political gains. Some countries recognised us, some brigades surrendered ... and more than 30 officers defected."
As the Gaddafi brigades collapsed, the rebels reached a sympathiser in the Libyan military who patched them into the radio communications of Gaddafi's forces. "We could hear the panic through their orders," said the senior NTC official. "That was the first indication that our youths were in control of Tripoli."
As the hunt for Gaddafi got underway, the NTC began implementing a 70-page plan, drawn up in consultation with its foreign military backers, aimed at establishing security in the capital.
Officials in London, Paris and Washington are at pains to say the plan is not based on the experience of Iraq or any other country, but the lessons of their mistakes in Baghdad are obvious.
At a press conference in Qatar, NTC head Jibril said Libya would "rehabilitate and cure our wounds by being united so we can rebuild the nation."
Unity was not hard to find during the uprising. "The most important factor was the will of the people," commander Alhasi told Reuters. "The people hate Gaddafi."
Will Libya remain united once he's gone?
(With reporting by Robert Birsel in Benghazi, Peter Graff in Tripoli, Michael Georgy in the Western Mountains, Phil Stewart and Mark Hosenball in Washington, Regan Doherty in Doha, Bill Maclean and Peter Apps in London, John Irish in Paris, Nick Carey in Chicago, Aleksander Vasovic in Belgrade and Justyna Pawlak in Brussels; editing by Simon Robinson, Mike Williams and Sara Ledwith)

Friday, 19 August 2011

Lockerbie bomber: Failure of western justice

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/18/lockerbie-bomber-megrahi-libyan-conflict/print

The Lockerbie bomber I know

Two years ago Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was controversially released on the grounds he was about to die. But this shadowy figure has survived to become a pawn in the Libyan conflict. John Ashton, who has long believed in his innocence, describes the man behind the myth
  • guardian.co.uk,
  • larger | smaller
  • Article history
  • Megrahi is greeted on his return to Libya in August 2009.
    Megrahi is greeted on his return to Libya in August 2009. Photograph: AFP/Getty Images
    It's an anniversary that the Scottish justice minister, Kenny MacAskill, will have long dreaded. Two years ago tomorrow MacAskill granted Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, AKA "the Lockerbie bomber", compassionate release from the life sentence he was serving for the murder of the 270 victims of the 1988 bombing. MacAskill had been advised that terminal cancer was likely to end the Libyan's life within the following three months: he had, in short, been "sent home to die". As Megrahi's recent appearance at a pro-Gaddafi rally reminded us, he has not stuck to the script. The anniversary presents sections of the media with another opportunity to splutter its outrage at MacAskill's decision, and to resurrect the theory that it was driven by backroom deals rather than medical evidence. More seriously, for many of the relatives of the Lockerbie dead it adds an appalling insult to their already grievous injury. But Megrahi's survival, and the Lockerbie case in general, now has far wider significance. For western governments struggling to justify why Libya should be singled out for enforced regime change, the issue has become a godsend. In recent weeks both Barack Obama and William Hague have tried to boost wilting public support for the war by highlighting Gaddafi's responsibility for the 1988 attack. Libya's government-in-waiting, the National Transitional Council, has weighed in too. Its leader, Mustafa Abdel-Jalil, claimed in February that Gaddafi personally ordered the bombing, and its London PR company, Bell-Pottinger, followed up Hague's comments by circulating a claim by a leading cancer specialist that MacAskill's decision was based on flawed medical advice. There is, though, another view that is shared by many who have scrutinised the Lockerbie case. They hold that the true scandal was not Megrahi's release, but his 2001 conviction. The Justice for Megrahi campaign, founded in 2008, counts among its signatories Dr Jim Swire and Rev John Mosey, each of whom lost a daughter in the bombing, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and the head of the Catholic Church in Scotland, Cardinal Keith O'Brien. Another signatory, Scottish QC Ian Hamilton, last year blogged: "I don't think there's a lawyer in Scotland who now believes Mr Megrahi was justly convicted." I go further than those lawyers: I am as certain as I can be that Megrahi is innocent. For three years until his return to Libya I worked as a researcher alongside his legal team and since then have been writing a book with him. I have read all his case files and have visited him many times, both in prison and in Tripoli. I'm one of a handful of people familiar with both the man and the evidence that convicted him. It requires a book to explain all the flaws in that evidence. In 2007 the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) granted Megrahi an appeal, having identified six possible grounds for overturning the conviction. Among these, remarkably, was that the original judgment, delivered by three Scottish judges at a specially constructed court in the Netherlands, was unreasonable. Four of the other grounds concerned the Crown's most important witness, a Maltese shopkeeper called Tony Gauci, in whose shop Megrahi allegedly bought the clothes that ended up in the same suitcase as the bomb. In 1991 he picked out Megrahi from a lineup of photos. The SCCRC discovered that before doing so he had expressed an interest in receiving a reward, and that after Megrahi's conviction the Scottish police secretly approached the US Department of Justice to secure a $2m payment. Gauci's evidence was, in any case, highly unreliable. His descriptions of the clothes purchaser all suggested the man was around 50 years old, 6ft tall and with dark skin, whereas Megrahi was 36, is 5ft 8in and has light skin. There is also a wealth of circumstantial evidence that suggests Lockerbie was the work of Iranian proxies, rather than Libya. (Although the Libyan government formally accepted responsibility for Lockerbie in 2004, it made clear that it was doing so only to rid the country of UN sanctions.) The final reason for my near certaintly about Megrahi is my knowledge of the man himself. Who, then, is he if not the cartoon terrorist of contemporary mythology? Few have any idea: he opted not to give evidence at trial, and has barely spoken to the media. He was born in Tripoli in 1952, into poverty that was typical of the times in Libya. One of eight siblings, his family shared a house with two others, and his mother supplemented his father's customs officer's income by sewing for neighbours. As a young child he was plagued by chest problems, for which he received daily vitamin supplements at his Unesco-administered school. His main passion was football, which continues to absorb him. After finishing school in 1970, he briefly trained as a marine engineer at Rumney Technical College in Cardiff, hoping to become a ship's captain or navigator. When his eyesight proved too poor, he dropped out and returned to Tripoli, where he trained as a flight dispatcher for the state-owned Libyan Arab Airlines (LAA). Having completed his training and gained his dispatcher's licence in the US, he was gradually promoted to head of operations at Tripoli airport. Keen to improve his education, he studied geography at the University of Benghazi. He came top in his year and was invited to join the teaching staff on the promise that he could study for a master's degree in climatology in the US. When the promise proved hollow, he opted to boost his salary by returning to LAA. In 1986 he became a partner in a small company called ABH and was temporarily appointed LAA's head of airline security. The following year he became part-time coordinator of the Libyan Centre for Strategic Studies. His Scottish prosecutors aimed to prove that these roles were cover for his activities as a senior agent for the Libyan intelligence service, the JSO. Megrahi maintains that his only involvement with the JSO came during his 12-month tenure as head of airline security when he was seconded to the organisation to oversee the training of some of its personnel for security positions within the airline. There is ample documentary evidence to support his claim that ABH was a legitimate trading company whose main business was the purchase of spares for LAA aircraft, often in breach of US sanctions. He admits that he sometimes travelled on a false passport, but insists that it was issued to give him cover for his sanctions-busting activities; unlike his true passport, it did not betray his airline background. Megrahi says that it came as a complete surprise when, in November 1991, he and his former LAA colleague Lamin Fhimah were charged with the bombing (Fhimah was found not guilty). Megrahi also maintains that it was their decision to stand trial and that they were not ordered to by their government. He was repeatedly warned that he was unlikely to receive a fair trial, but believed he would be acquitted. During his decade in prison his good manners and cooperative behaviour earned him the respect of the officers. He bonded with them through football, joining in their three-a-side matches at HMP Barlinnie and bantering about Glasgow's Old Firm rivalry. Perversely, he supported Rangers, but his favourite player was Celtic's Henrik Larsson. He was cheered by visits from well-known figures, most notably Nelson Mandela, and by hundreds of letters of support. In 2005 he was transferred to a low-security wing of HMP Gateside in Greenock, where he was placed among long-term prisoners nearing the end of their sentences. He was soon accepted by both inmates and officers, one of whom volunteered to me: "We all know he didn't do it." I would visit him there in one of the tiny rooms set aside for legal visits. He always arrived with a bundle of papers and would then take me through fine points of evidential detail. He was demanding, but friendly and humorous. He was sustained by the support of his family and by regular prayer; like most Libyans of his generation he is a devout Muslim. He abhors violent extremism and was reduced to tears by the 9/11 attacks. We were optimistic that his appeal would succeed, but its progress was glacial. In autumn 2008, with the first hearing still six months away, he was diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer. He had always dreamed of clearing his name and returning to his family, but eventually felt compelled to choose between the two. Although the compassionate release decision carried no legal preconditions, he knew that abandoning the appeal would smooth the process. No longer able to make his case in court, he asked me to write his story so he could make it to the public. Writing the book required numerous visits to Tripoli, where he received me warmly in the home he shares with his wife and four sons in a middle-class suburb. His illness limited our sessions to a couple of hours. He would check every word I'd written for accuracy and was insistent that I include the case for both sides and not shy away from awkward facts. He repeatedly told me: "I understand that people will judge me with their hearts, but I ask them to please also judge me with their heads." His reception, on his return to Tripoli, was portrayed as a triumphant official welcome, but, as a WikiLeaks cable revealed, the Libyan authorities limited the crowd to 200, with thousands of supporters and the international media kept away. A few months later the Sunday Times reported that, at the time he was convicted, he had $1.8m in a Swiss bank account. In fact the account had been dormant since 1993, when it had a balance of $23,000. This year the same paper reported a claim by NTC leader Abdel-Jalil that Megrahi had blackmailed Gaddafi to secure his release from prison "by threatening to expose the dictator's role" in the bombing. Had he done so he would have severely jeopardised both his chance of freedom and the safety of his family in Libya. Although he responded to such misreporting with a faint smile and a roll of the eyes, it hurt him deeply that anyone could believe him guilty of murder. One story was rather easier to refute: Sky News's October 2009 report that he had died. By chance I was with him that day. It was almost impossible to talk as every few seconds he took a call from a distressed relative. When I last saw him, in September 2010, he visited me at my hotel. It was the only time I saw him among ordinary Libyans. Again we were repeatedly interrupted, this time by strangers thanking him, not for an act of terrorism, but for sacrificing his liberty for the good of the nation. His decision to stand trial helped free the country from UN sanctions that imposed 12 years of collective punishment on the assumption of his guilt. We now know that that assumption was based on evidence that was, at best, flimsy and, at worst, fabricated. His appearance at the rally in a wheelchair probably won't silence the conspiracy theorists who claim he is living the life of Riley. The fact that he has made it this far is partly down to the superior medical care he receives. But I believe it's as much to do with his will to live and the knowledge that every day survived is a fragment of justice reclaimed.

Brian Whitaker's best blogs and analysis from the Middle East

    • 18 Aug 2011
    • At last, the Arabian wall of fear falls

    • Twenty years from now, December 2030, I know exactly where I will be: celebrating the anniversary of the fall of the Wall, with a dancing crowd, enjoying a display of giant falling dominoes.
      From The Daily Star >> Opinion >> Commentary
    • 18 Aug 2011
    • The Makers of the Revolution

    • All it takes is three or four fida’iyyin [persons ready to sacrifice for a cause] in every mosque chanting slogans after the end of prayer. It also depends on many factors. For example, in the...
      From Jadaliyya Ezine
    • 18 Aug 2011
    • Cottonil: The Underwear Controversy

    • Ramadan is here and already half way through. While some Egyptians think of it as a month of religious observance, family gatherings or festive meals; Ramadan can also be seen as the month of...
      From Rebel With A Cause
    • 17 Aug 2011
    • Bohn’s Interview with El General

    • At Foreign Policy‘s Mideast Channel, Lauren E. Bohn has an interview with the Tunisian hip hop artist El General (also known as Hamada Ben Amor) whose song “Rayes Lebled” landed him in jail during...
      From The Moor Next Door

Bestsellers from the Guardian shop

  • I Claudius 5DVD Box Set
  • One of the BBC's most successful TV dramas of all time. Save £25 on the mrrp with our offer.
  • From: £19.99

Guardian Bookshop

This week's bestsellers

  1. 1.  Westwood by Stella Gibbons £7.99
  2. 2.  Icon's 30 Second Series £38.97
  3. 3.  Perfect by Felicity Cloake £18.99
  4. 4.  Now All Roads Lead to France by Matthew Hollis £20.00
  5. 5.  Cyclebabble by James Randerson & Peter Walker £7.99

Friday, 12 August 2011

BN melarang pembesar suara diMasjid di Pulau Pinang

JAHEIPP ini adalah kerajaan pusat, bererti BN. Bukan kerajaan negeri.
Bererti UMNOlah yang melarang, bukan PR.

http://www.bharian.com.my/bharian/articles/Larangpembesarsuarawaktusubuh/Article/

Larang pembesar suara waktu subuh
Oleh Amin Ridzuan Ishak
aminridzuan@bharian.com.my
2011/08/12
PENGERUSI Kariah Masjid Padang Menora, Hamir Mahamud menunjukkan
pekeliling JHEAIPP melarang bacaan al-Quran dengan menggunakan
pembesar suara daripada masjid dan surau ketika ditemui di Padang
Menora Tasek Gelugor, semalam.
PENGERUSI Kariah Masjid Padang Menora, Hamir Mahamud menunjukkan
pekeliling JHEAIPP melarang bacaan al-Quran dengan menggunakan
pembesar suara daripada masjid dan surau ketika ditemui di Padang
Menora Tasek Gelugor, semalam.
Jabatan Hal Ehwal Agama Pulau Pinang putuskan amalan bertentangan
hukum syarak

TASEK GELUGOR: Jabatan Hal Ehwan Agama Islam Pulau Pinang (JHEAIPP)
mengarahkan semua masjid dan surau di negeri itu menghentikan bacaan
al-Quran menggunakan pembesar suara pada waktu subuh kerana amalan itu
bercanggah dengan hukum syarak dan boleh mengganggu orang lain di
dalam dan luar masjid.
Arahan itu selaras dengan keputusan mesyuarat Jawatankuasa Fatwa
Negeri pada 7 April lalu dan surat pekeliling mengenai larangan sudah
dikeluarkan pada 3 Ogos lalu dan diedarkan kepada semua jawatankuasa
kariah masjid.

More evidence to prove BN supports murderers

By not taking any concrete action against murderes, the BN government
is responsible for it as well.


http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/bahasa/article/keluarga-tiga-remaja-ditembak-polis-buat-aduan-ketiga-desak-siasatan-baru/

Keluarga tiga remaja ditembak polis buat aduan ketiga, desak siasatan
baru
Oleh Syed Mu'az Syed Putra
August 11, 2011

PETALING JAYA, 11 Ogos — Keluarga tiga remaja, yang ditembak mati oleh
polis dalam di Glenmarie dekat Shah Alam November lalu, hari ini
membuat satu lagi laporan polis sambil menegaskan kesemua anak mereka
ditembak mati oleh pasukan keselamatan itu.

Mereka menegaskan pendirian itu berdasarkan laporan bedah siasat yang
diterima baru-baru ini.

Laporan polis dibuat hari ini merupakan yang ketiga sejak insiden itu
November lalu.

Terbaru laporan bedah siasat yang melibatkan Muhamad Hanafi Omar
menunjukkan remaja berusia 22 tahun itu ditembak tiga kali — satu di
pipi, di bawah cuping teling dan dada.

Sebelum ini laporan bedah siasat dua lagi remaja, Mohd Shamil Hafiz
Shafie, 16, dan Mohd Khairul Nizam Tuah juga menerima tembakan di
kepala dan dada.

Dalam kejadian pada 13 November lalu, kesemua mereka mati di tempat
kejadian, namun polis menegaskan ketiga-tiga remaja itu ditembak
kerana cuba menyerang dengan parang.

Dalam laporan polis dibuat hari ini, ketiga-tiga keluarga itu mahu
polis membuka semula kertas siasatan dan mendakwa kesemua pegawai yang
terlibat dalam kes tersebut.

"Laporan-laporan bedah siasat ini menunjukkan bahawa peluru telah
memasuki badan mangsa pada sudut 45 darjah ke belakang, kami percaya
ini adalah kerana mereka ditembak oleh penembak yang berada di
kedudukan atas mereka iaitu mereka mungkin dipaksa melutut sebelum
ditembak mati.

"Soalnya juga kenapa perlu dua das tembakan ke kepala dan dada jika
tujuannya kononnya hanya untuk menghalang mereka daripada menyerang
polis, kesemua mereka menerima dua tembakan kecuali Hanafi (tiga
tembakan)," kata mereka.

Justeru mereka mendakwa polis cuba menutup penyalahgunaan kuasa oleh
pegawai mereka dengan mengatakan kesemua remaja itu cuba menyerang
dengan parang dan terpaksa dihalang dengan tembakan.

"Kami menuntut supaya satu penyiasatan dimulakan segera ke atas
anggota-anggota polis yang terlibat atas kesalahan membunuh.

"Kami juga mahu pegawai atasan yang mengeluarkan kenyataan berhubung
kes ini disiasat kerana memberikan maklumat palsu, kami menuntut
keadilan atas kematian anak-anak kami," katanya.

Hari ini keluarga ketiga-tiga remaja itu diwakili oleh Hamidah Kadar,
51, iaitu ibu Mohd Khairul Nizam, Norhafizah Mad Razali, 37, yang
merupakan ibu Mohd Shamil dan bapa Mohamad Hanafi, Omar Abu Bakar, 58.

Ketiga-tiga remaja itu mati ditembak polis di Jalan Kerjaya Glenmarie
kira-kira pukul 4.15 pagi selepas menyamun sebuah stesen minyak 13
Disember lalu.

Menurut laporan media sebelum ini ketiga-tiga remaja ini disyaki
sebagai ahli Geng Minyak dan mati ditembak kira-kira dua kilometer
dari lokasi kejadian.

Sementara itu Peguam hak asasi N. Surendran yang mewakili Lawyers For
Liberty menegaskan, laporan bedah siasat terbaru yang diterima
beberapa hari lalu menunjukkan ia bercanggah dengan maklumat polis.

"Kami telah menerima laporan bedah siasat Muhamad Hanafi dan ia jelas
menunjukkan kesemua mereka telah ditembak dalam jarak dekat.

"Mohd Shamil ditembak di tengah-tengah dahi dan dada, (Mohd) Hairul
Nizam di tepi kepala dan dada, dan Mohamad Hanafi menerima dua
tembakan di kepala iaitu di sisi pipi dan di bawah cuping telinga
selain turut ditembak di dada," katanya pada sidang media di Ibu
pejabat Polis Daerah Petaling Jaya di sini.

Tegas Naib Presiden PKR ini, laporan bedah siasat secara jelas
membuktikan kesemua remaja itu ditembak dengan tujuan "membunuh."

"Jika polis nak hentikan (serangan) mengapa tidak tembak di tangan
atau kaki? Mengapa mesti di kepala dan dada?

"Tembakan ini bukan bertujuan untuk menghentikan (serangan) tapi
bertujuan untuk membunuh," katanya.

Seorang lagi Naib Presiden PKR Nurul Izzah Anwar berkata, beliau mahu
Putrajaya memberikan penjelasan berhubung kes tembakan tiga remaja
itu .

Nurul Izzah, yang juga Ahli Parlimen Lembah Pantai mahu Perdana
Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak dan Menteri Dalam Negeri Datuk Seri
Hishammuddin Hussein memberikan penjelasan berhubung peningkatan kes
tembakan mati yang melibatkan polis.

"Sudah tentu kita akan bawa perkara ini Parlimen tapi terlebih dahulu
kita mahu penjelasan perdana menteri, menteri dalam negeri dan ketua
polis negara dalam isu ini," kata Nurul Izzah.

Saturday, 6 August 2011

Stupid Americans willing to die to make the rich get richer

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2011/08/06/MNA71KK6OJ.DTL

By voting Republicans in the last congress elections, had to the
current dilemma of US credit rating downgrading. Instead of taxing the
rich as Clinton had done successfully, they still want to continue the
failed Bush economics.

Americans think that by not taxing the rich, the rich will create
jobs. They failed to see the facts. It didn't. Obama failed because
these tax reductions for the rich is still effective during Obama's
term.

What the rich want is to stop health and education help which can kill
many poor US citizens. The stupid Americans even believe that these
taxes will be applied to the the poor which is a blatant lie, and
stupidly refuse to see the facts.

When reductions of health benefits for the rich, such as health
benefits for Congressmen, these people refuse to budge also.

U.S. credit rating downgraded by Standard & Poor's

Zachary A. Goldfarb, Washington Post
washington post August 6, 2011 04:00 AM Copyright washington post. All
rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed.

Saturday, August 6, 2011
Print E-mail
deliciousdel.icio.us
diggDigg
technoratiTechnorati
redditReddit
facebookLinkedIn
facebookFacebook slashdotSlashdot
farkFark
newsvineNewsvine
googleGoogle Bookmarks
twitterTwitter
Share Comments (1)
Georgia (default)
Verdana
Times New Roman
Arial
Font | Size:
55

Andrew Burton / Getty Images

An ABC News ticker announces the U.S. credit rating cut in New York
City's Times Square.
View Larger Image
More News

* San Quentin prisoners steal show with Shakespeare 08.06.11
* Jurors to be told not to tweet under new law 08.06.11
* Obama raises 60% of all California donations 08.06.11
* Rebels launch push in western Libya, aim for coast 08.06.11

Standard & Poor's announced Friday night that it downgraded the credit
rating of the United States for the first time, dealing a symbolic
blow to the world's economic superpower in what was a sharply worded
critique of the American political system.

Lowering the nation's rating to one notch below triple-A, the credit
rating company said "political brinksmanship" in the debate over the
debt had made the U.S. government's ability to manage its finances
"less stable, less effective and less predictable." It said the
bipartisan agreement reached this week to find at least $2.1 trillion
in budget savings fell short of what was necessary to tame the
nation's debt over time and predicted that leaders would not be likely
to achieve more savings in the future.

"It's always possible the rating will come back, but we don't think
it's coming back any time soon," said David Beers, head of S&P's
sovereign debt rating unit.

The decision came after an afternoon of furious debate between the
Obama administration and S&P. Government officials argued S&P's
analysis of the potential for political agreement was flawed and that
its initial report contained mathematical errors - the company had
overstated the U.S. deficit over 10 years by $2 trillion.

"A judgment flawed by a $2 trillion error speaks for itself," a
Treasury spokesman said Friday.
Uncharted territory

The downgrade to double-A-plus will push the global financial markets
into uncharted territory after a volatile week fueled by concerns over
a worsening debt crisis in Europe and a faltering economy in the
United States.

The triple-A rating has made the U.S. Treasury bond one of the world's
safest investments - and has helped the nation borrow at
extraordinarily cheap rates to finance its government operations,
including two wars and an expensive social safety net for retirees.

Treasury bonds also have been an island of stability amid the economic
upheaval of the past few years. The nation has had a triple-A rating
for 70 years.

Analysts say that, over time, the downgrade could push up borrowing
costs for the U.S. government, costing taxpayers tens of billions of
dollars a year. It could also drive up interest rates for consumers
and companies seeking mortgages, credit cards and business loans.

A downgrade may also have a cascading effect on states and localities.
These governments could lose their triple-A credit ratings as well,
potentially raising the cost of borrowing for schools, roads and
parks.

But the exact impact of the downgrade won't be known until at least
Sunday night, when Asian markets open, and perhaps not fully grasped
for months. Analysts say the initial effect on the markets may be
modest because they have been anticipating an S&P downgrade for weeks.

And even without a triple-A rating from S&P, U.S. debt is seen as one
of the safest investments in the world. Investors clearly weren't
scared away this week. While stocks were plunging, investors were
buying Treasurys and driving up their prices.

The ratings action immediately fueled partisan wrangling Friday night.
Allies of President Obama said it underscored his call for a "grand
bargain" that would trim $4 trillion from the federal budget involving
a mix of tax revenue and spending cuts.

Republicans criticized Obama's handling of the economy. "Standard &
Poor's rating downgrade is a deeply troubling indicator of our
country's decline under President Obama," Republican presidential
candidate Mitt Romney said.

S&P has angered government officials with aggressive warnings over the
past few months of a potential downgrade. Those warnings, so far, have
not worried government bond markets.

What's more, the two other major credit rating companies, Moody's
Investors Service and Fitch Ratings, have said they would preserve the
nation's triple-A rating for now.

S&P's downgrade was as much a political critique as a financial
conclusion. It is based on a view that American political leaders
would be unable to come up with at least $4 trillion in savings, which
is needed to bring the nation's debt to a manageable level over the
next decade.

The debt deal passed by Congress earlier this week proposed spending
cuts in two phases. Democrats and Republicans agreed to the first
round, worth nearly $1 trillion. But a congressional committee must
decide the remaining $1.2 trillion to $1.5 trillion, and S&P
questioned whether that would ever happen.
Indictment of gridlock

S&P added that it expects that the upper-income Bush-era tax cuts will
continue, despite vows from Obama to end the breaks next year.

"The majority of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any
measure that would raise revenues," the firm said.

S&P's downgrade served as an indictment of the gridlock that sent the
nation to the edge of defaulting on its debt obligations. It is also
striking in part because it reflects the tremendous power of a small
group of financial analysts employed by a New York company, part of
McGraw-Hill. In Europe, political leaders have taken aim at credit
rating companies when they cut the ratings of governments struggling
with heavy debt burdens.

The company said the United States' financial position was diverging
from that of other triple-A countries, including Canada, France,
Germany and Britain.

Countries with a double-A-plus rating include New Zealand and Belgium.
Among those countries with a double-A rating, one notch lower, are
Bermuda, Spain and Qatar.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/08/05/MNA71KK6OJ.DTL#ixzz1UF6YGac3

Easy for BN to issue ICs to phantom voters

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/2011/08/03/yong-attacked-over-phantom-voters/

Yong attacked over ‘phantom voters’

Queville To | August 3, 2011
Former senator Dr Chong Eng Leong has offered his assistance to any institution or group wanting to rid the electoral rolls of phantoms voters.
KOTA KINABALU: Political activist Dr Chong Eng Leong, already under attack by ex-chief minister Harris Salleh for his outspokeness over the illegal immigrant issue, has now trained his guns on another former Sabah chief minister.
This time Chong, a former senator, alleged that Yong Teck Lee, who is now in the opposition ranks with his Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP), was a beneficiary of phantom voters in Likas, during the 1999 general election.
“Yong, you were not a victim of phantom voters in Likas, you were not the scapegoat – you got their votes and for this it was not your fault but it was what BN wanted.
“Loss of your YB status then had nothing to do with phantom voters in Likas rolls.
“It was Harris Salleh’s petition against you that cost you your YBship – your election billboards contravened election laws,” Chong pointed out yesterday in response to Yong’s statement.
Chong, who is a former Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) member, is now with PKR.
Acknowledging that the subsequent Likas election petition in the same year had exposed the method by which ICs were being issued using falsified SDs (Statutory Declarations), Chong said as the petitioner he did not stop at the Likas roll after the trial.
He also said that he had not “conveniently and consistently ignored the existence of phantom voters in other places like Kawang” as claimed by Yong in his statement.
“In fact I further probed into the whole Sabah rolls. That’s how I traced the 70,000 names in the Sabah rolls, names corresponding to the Project IC numbers disclosed in the trial and Kawang had 1,292 phantom voters,” Chong added.
No political will
He however agreed with Yong that it is possible to rid the rolls of phantoms – only if the central government has the political will to do it.
“And I am more then willing to help any body or institution like SAPP towards this end, after all it is for Sabah’s sovereignty within Malaysia,” he said.
Meanwhile, in a statement carried by the local newspapers, Harris on Monday accused Chong of “repeatedly instigating matters on racial and religious issues” and said that his Yayasan Islam Sabah will lodge a police report against him.
He criticised Chong for singling out Malays and Muslims as the beneficiaries of the alleged secret project to issue citizenship to foreign immigrants in order to build a vote bank for the ruling Barisan Nasional government.

Thursday, 4 August 2011

Re: ALIRAN BERSIH 2.0 WALK

salam.my nama is ahmad jufliz.i am the lawyer for the family of late baharudin ahmad who died during the bersih rally at klcc. i am now gathering information and evidence from witnessess who were at the klcc.kindly call me at 0126548102 or patrick dass at 0123027701 to lent us assistence on this matter.tq.