Tuesday, 31 August 2010

Jewish Israeli soldiers treat all civilians as terrorists

It is confirmed by a Malaysian that the Israeli soldiers shouted at
passengers of the aid ships that these aid workers were terrorists.
The aid ships were stopped in International waters after some of them
were killed by Israeli gun fires from their helicopters. the Israeli
commandos were disarmed and their guns thrown to the sea by the aid
workers and they hit soldiers with sticks in order to prevent them
from boarding the ships.

No wonder they blind fold all their captives. They treat all civilians
as terrorists. But armed soldiers kidnapping aid workers in
internatioinal waters are themselves not terrorists? Killing unarmed
aid workers also not terrorism? With this kind of mentality, it is not
surprising that the Jews were the real terrorists and had been killing
innocent civilians deliverate and premeditatedly. It is no chance that
Corie, a US citizen, were killed by these Jewish Israelis. She was
deliberately murdered by the terrorist government of Israel.

Malaysian Company sues Apple for Patent Infringement

It shows the imporatance of patenting ideas. Please note that Patents
are only ideas. You don't have to build it but this Malaysian company
actually builds terminals. Unforatunately it is quiet in Malaysian
newspapers.


http://www.itproportal.com/portal/news/article/2010/8/31/malaysian-company-sues-apple-over-geotargeted-adverts/

Malaysian Company Sues Apple Over Geotargeted Adverts

31 August, 2010, by ITProPortal Staff

Apple has been sued by a Malaysian firm called StreetSpace which
claims ownership of a patent related to location based advertising.

The lawsuit involves Apple's iAd mobile advertising service, which
uses GPS data to deliver location based advertisement on users'
device.

StreetSpace has also sued other wireless advertising services
providers including Apple owned Quattro Wireless, Google, AdMob,
Nokia, Navteq, Millenial Media and Jumptap.

The Malaysian firm is responsible for developing a remote Internet
terminal called Web Station where customers walk-up to this station
and access the Internet.

The system uses a technology which helps the company in delivering
targeted advertisements to the customers.

StreetSpace has based its lawsuit on a US patent titled 'Method and
System for Providing Personalized Online Services and Advertisements
in Public Spaces', which was awarded to it in 2005.

The issue might prove a major hindrance for Apple's iAd service,
which, according to StreetSpace, uses its patented technology to
deliver targeted advertisements based on user's location, profile and
usage history.

Thursday, 26 August 2010

More proofs that Sabah continue to be neglected

What more do you want proof for?

Only 100 million for the whole Sabah when the total fund is supposed
to be billions???

That means less than 10% as always for SAbah that accounts for 23%
area and 14% population, and most of the poor are in Sabah, making up
more than 30% and yet receiving less than 10%.

Isn't the promise by Federal Leaders that they WILL NOT DEVELOP SABAH,
because it is not economical, so true again? Why are Sabahans so blind
to this????

This is the dilemma of Sabahans that don't bother to count properly,
and elect leaders similarly stupid as they are.


http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID=74283

YB upset Sukau has been left out

Published on: Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Email to a friend Printer Friendly

Kota Kinabalu: Sukau may continue to be among the poorest State
constituencies in Sabah since it has not received a single rural
development project under the National Key Results Area (NKRA) funds.

Its Assemblyman Saddi Abdul Rahman was disappointed that the Ministry
of Rural and Regional Development did not consider channeling some
development projects to provide basic amenities in Sukau.

"Together with other elected representatives, I had listed more than
94 rural projects worth over RM100 million that are needed in Sukau
particularly basic amenities like roads, supply of water and
electricity, among others.

"I submitted my proposal for funding under NKRA to the Ministry before
the deadline on Sept 10 last year.

"Unfortunately, not even a single rural project under NKRA's billions
of Ringgit in funds has been approved and given to Sukau until now,"
he lamented here, on Tuesday.

He was responding to a statement by Chief Minister Datuk Seri Musa
Aman's in Keningau, that the government will probe how government
allocations are spent for development projects in the State.

Musa said it was interesting that allocations for certain areas
sometimes did not match the sum stated during the briefings by heads
of local administrations.

"The government will take necessary action to identify where the
billions went to," Musa said at a briefing by five district officers -
Keningau, Tenom, Nabawan, Tambunan and Ranau- on development
strategies adopted for each district at Perkasa Hotel, in Keningau on
Monday.

Saddi said it is vital for such investigation to be carried out as the
government, especially elected representatives, are answerable to the
grassroots.

"What Musa has said is timely and such probe should be implemented as
the development funds to carry out projects are for the people to
enjoy basic amenities and facilities that could elevate their living
standard and bring comfort to their lives," he said.

Sukau residents from 42 villages have been waiting for rural
development projects from the government to provide better road
conditions as well as supply of water and electricity which some have
yet to enjoy.

"The villagers are questioning what has happened to the NKRA funds and
why not even one project is approved for Sukau. They are feeling
cynical about why the government has overlooked their interests and
needs.

"I am also feeling disappointed that the ministry has not responded to
several follow-up letters that I have submitted. In the letters, I
have asked whether Sukau will be getting any rural projects under NKRA
funds," he said.

Wednesday, 18 August 2010

MTUC finally understands the need for Minimum wage

I have been trying hard to get workers to demand for minimum wages.
This article shows that hopefully they understand what is at stake
here. They must have asked some economists to make factual research
and comparisons. At least there is hope for Malaysia but time is
running out.

http://www.theborneopost.com/?p=59215

Home » News » Local » 'Minimum wage: Hard to convince bosses'
'Minimum wage: Hard to convince bosses'

August 18, 2010, Wednesday

KUCHING: Malaysian Trade Union Congress (MTUC) Sarawak said the
union's greatest task in its fight for minimum wage is convincing
employers that a minimum wage is in their economic interest in the
long run.
Andrew Lo

Andrew Lo

"So the first question is how to convince employers that a minimum
wage is in their economic interest in the long run and the second
question is to convince the government that it is in Malaysia's
economic interest to have a minimum wage," said MTUC Sarawak secretary
Andrew Lo.

Of late, there has been a growing debate on whether or not Malaysia
should introduce a minimum wage policy. The call for a minimum wage
has been on the ascendancy ever since MTUC first proposed a nationwide
minimum wage more than 12 years ago, when Tun Mahathir Mohamad was
Prime Minister.

Lo said, because of the undying objection by the business community
led by the Malaysian Employers Federation (MEF), the government at
that time rejected the idea of a nationwide minimum wage asserting
that it would lead to an increase in the cost of doing business and
thus would hurt Malaysian competitiveness.

"The business community convinced the government to adopt a market
friendly policy and that wage levels must be determined by market
forces. Recently, the consensus has somewhat shifted and the idea of a
minimum wage is not as pariah as it once was.

"Even Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak has just stated that
business must embrace minimum wage as a business strategy and as an
opportunity to revitalise their businesses. Even employers' groups
such as the respected Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers (FMM) has
proposed a minimum wage model that is reasonable, workable and forward
looking," he added.

However, MEF has steadfastly declared that even if the world is to
come to an end, and we are born again, MEF will still strongly oppose
a minimum wage.

"Such strong objections from MEF are not at all surprising as MEF's
sole interest is the maximising of profits by its members. I will be
the first to accept that employers are in business to make money and
to generate profits. So whatever decision that employers make is built
on this premise.

"Minimum wage is not just a social tool to reduce poverty, it is a
fiscal tool to enhance economic growth and productivity improvements,
as the empirical evidence in countries that have minimum wage
structure has demonstrated," Lo said.

More than 90 per cent of countries worldwide have a minimum wage, he
pointed out.

"Our competitors in the 1980s namely Taiwan, South Korea and even Hong
Kong, the bastion of capitalism and free markets, have minimum wage
systems while in Singapore the head of the trade union movement is a
government minister and thus the country is able to formulate an
inclusive wage policy that has seen wage levels more than three times
higher than Malaysia and productivity growth that has outstripped us,"
he said.

These four countries that were on par with us in the 1980s, have
overtaken Malaysia, became high income nations and members of the
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), while
the nation is stuck in the middle income trap, Lo claimed.

"Today we are competing with Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia and
Philippines. All these countries also have minimum wage and if we
still stick to the archaic views expressed by MEF, we will be
overtaken by them soon," he said.

Essentially the debate on minimum wage hinges on workers wanting a
minimum wage as a means to increase wage levels to provide sufficient
purchasing power to enable a worker to have a basic standard of
living; employers reject it as an increased cost of doing business and
hurt competitiveness; the government's aim to develop the country into
a high-income nation and fully developed by 2020.

Wages should be determined by market forces, he stressed. The
empirical evidence has clearly pointed to the fact that wage levels in
Malaysia have been suppressed and lagged behind by all measures.

The World Bank has reported that wages in Malaysia has increased by
only 2.6 per cent per annum.

"That is below inflation. The proportion of wages as a portion of GDP
has also fallen," Lo claimed.

He said the recently concluded National Employment Returns (NER)
showed that 34 per cent of Malaysians earn less than RM700 which is
below the poverty line.

In Sabah and Sarawak, where the cost of living is much higher, the
figures are a dismal 63 per cent and 48 per cent, respectively. A
further 37 per cent nationwide earn between RM700 and RM1,500, he
added.

For a country to be a developed nation in ten years' time, it is
alarming that 72 per cent of its workers earn less than RM1,500.

These statistics are collaborated by Employees Provident Fund's
figures, he pointed out.

The starting salary of an associate professor in our universities
today is the same as it was in 1975.

MEF's own figures presented to the government stated that the starting
pay of a doctorate holder is just RM2,370 a month and this may be one
of the reasons why the standards of our universities are dropping, he
claimed.

A clerk (with diploma) in Malaysia earns RM1,131 while in Singapore he
is paid an equivalent of RM4,747.

About 15 years ago, the salary of a part-time worker at a fast food
restaurant was RM3.80 an hour but today in Sabah particularly, it is
just RM2.50 while the price of a burger has gone up from RM1.20 to
more than RM4 in the same period.

"What is disheartening is the government recently issued
recommendations for public servants to take part-time jobs to make
ends meet. So clearly market forces, as propagated by MEF, has not
worked," he pointed out.

There are two reasons for these, said Lo.

Market forces are controlled by business, and combined by the
government policy of stifling trade unions movement by segregating
trade unions, only three per cent of private sector workers are trade
union members and less than two per cent are covered by collective
agreements, he added.

MEF has a declared policy of challenging trade union membership and
recognition. While the number of trade unions has increased, most of
the unions are in-house unions with less than 100 members.

Malaysia is perhaps the only country in the world that makes it
extremely difficult for high-value and knowledgeable workers to work
here, but has welcome millions of low-wage and unskilled workers, he
said.

"This has undoubtedly suppressed wages as Malaysian workers have to
compete for low wages," he stressed.

In an attempt to placate demand for a national legislated minimum
wage, the government in the past decade tried to introduce a sectoral
minimum wage by way of the Wages Council Act 1957, an archaic
legislation.

The last sectoral minimum wage was implemented in 1972, and as evident
by the minimum wage for security guards, has not worked at all.

Open letter to Anwar Ibrahim and geng

Already sent via FACEBOOK. I wonder if he actually reads any of the
messages or his cohorts will allow him to read some of them.


Othman Ahmad: Banyak betul komen komen Datu Seri. Walaupun saya
sokong kesemuanya, lama kelamaan menjadi bosan juga. Apa kata bincang
untuk memperkuatkan parti pembangkang? Saya cadangkan 2 penjuru:
1) Buka akaun untuk penderma online atau offline seperti OBAMA.
Seperti siOBAMA, dia cuma mendapat derma beberapa ringgit dari seorang
s...ahaja tetapi ramai yang boleh menderma menjadikan OBAMA yang
paling kaya dalam kempen.
2) Buka permohonan secara online. Saya sudah cuba menjadi ahli
sebanyak 3 kali dengan membayar RM10 setiap kali tetapi sampai
sekarang tidak ada surat pengesahan.

Demikian juga dengan parti pembangkang yang lain. UMNO tidak. Ia
adalah parti yang paling organised. Contohnya UMNO sahaja yang memberi
sijil keahlian kepada Saya. Untuk memenangai apa-apa peperangan, bukan
setakat dengan semangat atau kebenarfan, tetapi memerlukan otak juga.

Israeli soldier feels nothing wrong in blindfolded prisoners

I don't see any reason why Palestinians need to be blind folded unless
it is to conceal their mistreatments of these prisoners. Worst
violations are still uncovered.


http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/18/world/middleeast/18briefs-EXSOLDIERSPE_BRF.html

World Briefing | Middle East
Israel: Ex-Soldier Speaks on Photos
By ROBERT MACKEY
Published: August 17, 2010

* Facebook
* Twitter
* Recommend
* Sign In to E-Mail
* Print
*
Reprints
* ShareClose
o Linkedin
o Digg
o Mixx
o MySpace
o Yahoo! Buzz
o Permalink
o

A former Israeli soldier who posted photographs on Facebook of herself
posing next to blindfolded Palestinian prisoners told Israeli Army
radio on Tuesday that she did not "understand what's wrong" with the
photographs, which were taken while she was on active duty. The former
soldier, Eden Abergil, who is now a reservist, said that the "pictures
were taken in good will, there was no statement in them." An Israeli
military spokesman denounced Ms. Abergil's snapshots as "disgraceful."
Breaking the Silence, an Israeli human rights group, added one of her
images to a new Facebook album of similar photographs taken over the
past decade. The group wrote, "This picture is not the ugly behavior
of one person, but a norm throughout the army." Ghassan Khatib, a
spokesman for the Palestinian Authority, told the BBC that the images
illustrated "the day-to-day life of the Palestinian people under
occupation," and suggested "that occupation also corrupts the
Israelis."

The World Wide Web is dead

And with it the browser and Google. This is a valid and interesting
point.

http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/08/ff_webrip/

The Web Is Dead. Long Live the Internet

* By Chris Anderson and Michael Wolff Email Author
* August 17, 2010 |
* 9:00 am |
* Wired September 2010
*

Sources: Cisco estimates based on CAIDA publications, Andrew Odlyzko

Sources: Cisco estimates based on CAIDA publications, Andrew Odlyzko

Skull
The Web Is Dead? A Debate
How the Web Wins
How Do Native Apps and Web Apps Compare?

Two decades after its birth, the World Wide Web is in decline, as
simpler, sleeker services — think apps — are less about the searching
and more about the getting. Chris Anderson explains how this new
paradigm reflects the inevitable course of capitalism. And Michael
Wolff explains why the new breed of media titan is forsaking the Web
for more promising (and profitable) pastures.


Who's to Blame:
Us
As much as we love the open, unfettered Web, we're abandoning it for
simpler, sleeker services that just work.
by Chris Anderson

You wake up and check your email on your bedside iPad — that's one
app. During breakfast you browse Facebook, Twitter, and The New York
Times — three more apps. On the way to the office, you listen to a
podcast on your smartphone. Another app. At work, you scroll through
RSS feeds in a reader and have Skype and IM conversations. More apps.
At the end of the day, you come home, make dinner while listening to
Pandora, play some games on Xbox Live, and watch a movie on Netflix's
streaming service.

You've spent the day on the Internet — but not on the Web. And you are
not alone.

This is not a trivial distinction. Over the past few years, one of the
most important shifts in the digital world has been the move from the
wide-open Web to semiclosed platforms that use the Internet for
transport but not the browser for display. It's driven primarily by
the rise of the iPhone model of mobile computing, and it's a world
Google can't crawl, one where HTML doesn't rule. And it's the world
that consumers are increasingly choosing, not because they're
rejecting the idea of the Web but because these dedicated platforms
often just work better or fit better into their lives (the screen
comes to them, they don't have to go to the screen). The fact that
it's easier for companies to make money on these platforms only
cements the trend. Producers and consumers agree: The Web is not the
culmination of the digital revolution.

A decade ago, the ascent of the Web browser as the center of the
computing world appeared inevitable. It seemed just a matter of time
before the Web replaced PC application software and reduced operating
systems to a "poorly debugged set of device drivers," as Netscape
cofounder Marc Andreessen famously said. First Java, then Flash, then
Ajax, then HTML5 — increasingly interactive online code — promised to
put all apps in the cloud and replace the desktop with the webtop.
Open, free, and out of control.

But there has always been an alternative path, one that saw the Web as
a worthy tool but not the whole toolkit. In 1997, Wired published a
now-infamous "Push!" cover story, which suggested that it was time to
"kiss your browser goodbye." The argument then was that "push"
technologies such as PointCast and Microsoft's Active Desktop would
create a "radical future of media beyond the Web."

"Sure, we'll always have Web pages. We still have postcards and
telegrams, don't we? But the center of interactive media —
increasingly, the center of gravity of all media — is moving to a post-
HTML environment," we promised nearly a decade and half ago. The
examples of the time were a bit silly — a "3-D furry-muckers VR space"
and "headlines sent to a pager" — but the point was altogether
prescient: a glimpse of the machine-to-machine future that would be
less about browsing and more about getting.


Who's to Blame:
Them
Chaos isn't a business model. A new breed of media moguls is bringing
order — and profits — to the digital world.
by Michael Wolff

An amusing development in the past year or so — if you regard post-
Soviet finance as amusing — is that Russian investor Yuri Milner has,
bit by bit, amassed one of the most valuable stakes on the Internet:
He's got 10 percent of Facebook. He's done this by undercutting
traditional American VCs — the Kleiners and the Sequoias who would, in
days past, insist on a special status in return for their early
investment. Milner not only offers better terms than VC firms, he sees
the world differently. The traditional VC has a portfolio of Web
sites, expecting a few of them to be successes — a good metaphor for
the Web itself, broad not deep, dependent on the connections between
sites rather than any one, autonomous property. In an entirely
different strategic model, the Russian is concentrating his bet on a
unique power bloc. Not only is Facebook more than just another Web
site, Milner says, but with 500 million users it's "the largest Web
site there has ever been, so large that it is not a Web site at all."

According to Compete, a Web analytics company, the top 10 Web sites
accounted for 31 percent of US pageviews in 2001, 40 percent in 2006,
and about 75 percent in 2010. "Big sucks the traffic out of small,"
Milner says. "In theory you can have a few very successful individuals
controlling hundreds of millions of people. You can become big fast,
and that favors the domination of strong people."

Milner sounds more like a traditional media mogul than a Web
entrepreneur. But that's exactly the point. If we're moving away from
the open Web, it's at least in part because of the rising dominance of
businesspeople more inclined to think in the all-or-nothing terms of
traditional media than in the come-one-come-all collectivist
utopianism of the Web. This is not just natural maturation but in many
ways the result of a competing idea — one that rejects the Web's
ethic, technology, and business models. The control the Web took from
the vertically integrated, top-down media world can, with a little
rethinking of the nature and the use of the Internet, be taken back.

This development — a familiar historical march, both feudal and
corporate, in which the less powerful are sapped of their reason for
being by the better resourced, organized, and efficient — is perhaps
the rudest shock possible to the leveled, porous, low-barrier-to-entry
ethos of the Internet Age. After all, this is a battle that seemed
fought and won — not just toppling newspapers and music labels but
also AOL and Prodigy and anyone who built a business on the idea that
a curated experience would beat out the flexibility and freedom of the
Web.


Illustration: Dirk Fowler